Imported GNU Classpath 0.90

2006-03-11 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, GNU Classpath 0.90 was released last week. It contains a lot of new standard library classes and bug fixes. See http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=4339 And the list of fixed bugs: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=classpath&target_milestone=0.90 This version has be

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

2006-03-11 Thread Andrew Haley
Sandro Tolaini writes: > > On 10/mar/2006, at 20:42, Tom Tromey wrote: > > > libffi and mudflap were covered by Paolo and Andrew. > > I have done some work on sysv.S and now libffi compiles fine on OSX/ > Intel. Unfortunately, I had to put some #ifdef __APPLE__ this file > because App

Re: GCC 4.0.3 Released

2006-03-11 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > GCC 4.0.3 has been released. > > You need to add a link on the page > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0 > > Similarly for the 4.1.0 release on the page > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.1 > > And don't you need to display the release date instead of "current chan

Re: GCC 4.0.3 Released

2006-03-11 Thread Kaveh R. Ghazi
> > GCC 4.0.3 has been released. > > You need to add a link on the page > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0 Also, the link from the home page in the NEWS/ANNOUNCEMENTS section is broken. It mistakenly links to .../gcc-4.0.3, (there is no such page). That link should be http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0 i

Re: GCC 4.0.3 Released

2006-03-11 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
"Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The main page also needs updating for 3.4 status (3.4.6 released, branch | closed) that is part of the release I'm making. -- Gaby

gcc-4.2-20060311 is now available

2006-03-11 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20060311 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20060311/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: gcc-4.2-20060304 is now available

2006-03-11 Thread Mark Mitchell
Andrew Pinski wrote: >>> gcc-core-4.2-20060304.tar.bz2 = 15703096 >>> gcc-g++-4.2-20060304.tar.bz2 = 3905138 >>> gcc-objc-4.2-20060304.tar.bz2 = 191280 >>> gcc-fortran-4.2-20060304.tar.bz2 = 793478 >>> gcc-testsuite-4.2-20060304.tar.bz2 = 3606941 >>> >>> I'd reall

Re: GCC 4.0.3 Released

2006-03-11 Thread Mark Mitchell
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote: > > > GCC 4.0.3 has been released. > > > > You need to add a link on the page > > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0 > > Also, the link from the home page in the NEWS/ANNOUNCEMENTS section is > broken. > > It mistakenly links to .../gcc-4.0.3, (there is no such page). That > l

Re: Using only regular register names in emitted assembly

2006-03-11 Thread Mike Stump
On Mar 10, 2006, at 8:09 AM, Nikolaos Kavvadias wrote: how is it possible to emit regular register names (e.g. for the MIPS to use $31 and not $ra) when producing assembly output (with mips-elf-gcc -S)? I want to just use the arithmetic names ($0 to $31). Yes, just edit gcc/config/mips/* and pu

Re: autogen -T ../../trunk/fixincludes/check.tpl ../../trunk/fixincludes/inclhack.def

2006-03-11 Thread Mike Stump
On Mar 10, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Mar 10, 2006, at 10:13 PM, Toon Moene wrote: autogen -T ../../trunk/fixincludes/check.tpl ../../trunk/ fixincludes/inclhack.def make[2]: autogen: Command not found Maybe we should change this to be autogen || true so that we don't ge

Re: autogen -T ../../trunk/fixincludes/check.tpl ../../trunk/fixincludes/inclhack.def

2006-03-11 Thread Toon Moene
Mike Stump wrote: Hum, I'd say that contrib/gcc_update should be used, if it wasn't, and that the make files should only have the dependencies if in maintainer mode, and that maintainers should have autogen. Toon would have to give us a hint which part failed him, for me to know just what

Re: GCC 4.0.3 Released

2006-03-11 Thread Mark Mitchell
Eric Botcazou wrote: >> GCC 4.0.3 has been released. > > You need to add a link on the page > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0 > > Similarly for the 4.1.0 release on the page > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.1 > > And don't you need to display the release date instead of "current changes" > for 4.1.0 on the

re: gcc-4.0.3 released

2006-03-11 Thread Dan Kegel
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/changes.html#4.0.3 is missing a link to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&target_milestone=4.0.3 with text This is the list of problem reports (PRs) from GCC's bug tracking system that are known to be fixed in the 4.0.3 release.

Re: gcc-4.2-20060304 is now available

2006-03-11 Thread Mike Stump
On Mar 11, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote: Creating these separate modules seems somewhat pointless given the core is 80% of the total. Why not simplify things a bit and just package it all up together? Just to put another idea on the table, we can require they grab the full tar

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

2006-03-11 Thread Mike Stump
On Mar 10, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Sandro Tolaini wrote: I have done some work on sysv.S and now libffi compiles fine on OSX/ Intel. Unfortunately, I had to put some #ifdef __APPLE__ this file because Apple ships an old cctools with as that doesn't understand some directives. My patch works on the

100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X

2006-03-11 Thread Nickolay Kolchin
During "bashmark" memory benchmark perfomance analyze, I found 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X. -- test_cmd.cpp (simplified bashmark memory RW test) --- #include #include template static void int_membench(uint8_t* mb1, uint8_t* mb2) { for(uint32_t i = 0; i <

Re: autogen -T ../../trunk/fixincludes/check.tpl ../../trunk/fixincludes/inclhack.def

2006-03-11 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:30:45AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote: > Hum, I'd say that contrib/gcc_update should be used, if it wasn't, > and that the make files should only have the dependencies if in > maintainer mode, and that maintainers should have autogen. Toon > would have to give us a hint