Steve,
Note, your patch conflicted with one of the other 7 patches
I tested today. You'll need to make sure the merge is
correct.
I presume that is my missing argument patch? I was going to commit it
just now but ran into:
-c ../../trunk/gcc/crtstuff.c -DCRT_BEGIN \
-o crtbegin.o
In file i
Following some of my recent middle-end clean-ups, I believe that
we're now at the point where incrementally the middle-end can
start ignoring the TREE_OVERFLOW bits on constant tree nodes.
As a step in this direction, the patch below removes the
TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW checks from integer_zerop, in
Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
All,
FWIW, I would like to add my support for creating a branch for gpc
with the eventual goal
of integrating Pascal into mainline. I would bootstrap and test this
branch, report bugs and
do my best to help with solutions although I'm new at this.
I think both pro
> "Rafael" == Rafael Espíndola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rafael> I found a bit strange that there were no java regression since
Rafael> convert_ieee_real_to_integer is no longer used. Is a testcase
Rafael> missing?
Did you run Jacks? As I recall it has a test for this.
Tom
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20060401 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20060401/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
All,
FWIW, I would like to add my support for creating a branch for gpc with
the eventual goal
of integrating Pascal into mainline. I would bootstrap and test this
branch, report bugs and
do my best to help with solutions although I'm new at this.
I think both projects would benefit. I'll v
On 3/29/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > I do have one other issue to resolve in this legacy c code which I
> > am unclear on.
>
> Wrong list. This list is for the development of gcc, not other
> software.
>
> > warning: initializatio
