I'm trying to figure out whether we can get the SEE and
Autovectorization improvements into 4.2. I'd like to get these changes
in because they will deliver some noticeable improvements in
performance, and because the submitters seem to have tried hard to get
them included.
Roger, I know that you
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 07:21:24PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> >Otherwise, would it be possible to generate the DWARF Tables and
> >add those tables dynamically to the running program?
>
> Yes (could require OS changes).
>
> >Under windows, Microsoft provides an API for JITs that does exactly
On May 2, 2006, at 6:08 AM, Bill Cunningham wrote:
Everytime I compile gcc I see that libiberty is being compiled.
Is this
a needed library and if not how can I switch it off? I'm using
glibc-2.1 and
I'd like to figure out compiling 2.3 and I've done it before so I
just have
to remember
On May 2, 2006, at 4:23 AM, jacob navia wrote:
To get to the corresponding catch, the runtime should skip through
the intermediate frames in assembler generated by the JIT. We would
like to know how should be the interface with gcc to do this.
The C++ abi spec and dwarf specs are good backgr
On May 2, 2006, at 6:38 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
I even tried following your directions and it worked for me without
conflicts.
I had to replace 4:6 with 3:5 but other than that it worked.
And this was with 1.3.0.
Hum... :-( Thanks for the data point. Might just be me, with a
codegen bug
On May 2, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
Also, with svn 1.4 dev (all i have on this machine)
Cool, fixed in 1.4 dev. Now I'm curious if it is fixed in 1.3.x.
I really want to update, but, the fortunes of a large company with
lots of revenue are predicated on this stuff actually
> I wrote a lot of the current zone collector. Before that, Daniel
> Berlin did a lot of work on it. I really don't think I have time to
> mentor an SoC project (Daniel, do you, maybe?),
I do, in fact, have time to mentor such a project, and would be happy to
mentor it if you submit it and it
On May 2, 2006, at 6:05 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
What happened to rev3?
I did a svn mkdir brnaches && svn mv brnaches branches, but didn't
want to fess up to it.
Also, with svn 1.4 dev (all i have on this machine)
Cool, fixed in 1.4 dev. Now I'm curious if it is fixed in 1.3.x. I
rea
> > __fpscr_values[0] &= off;
> > __fpscr_values[0] |= on;
> > __fpscr_values[1] &= off;
> > __fpscr_values[1] |= on;
>
> Ok, I'll bite. Why are there two of them?!
Well, this is the real reason why we need an API and not just a simple
builtin. GCC uses that table of values to quickl
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:07:19PM +0200, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> Having that in mind, also because I actually like doing
> infrastructural projects, cleaning up, speeding up things instead of
> implementing new features, I think I have found a suitable area for my
> project: garbage collection.
> mrs $ svn ci .
> Adding trunk/file1
> Transmitting file data .
> Committed revision 2.
> mrs $ svn cp file:///Volumes/mrs4/svn-repo/trunk file:///Volumes/mrs4/
> svn-repo/branches/rel
> Committed revision 4.
What happened to rev3?
Also, with svn 1.4 dev (all i have on this machine), i
> FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 cp_compat_y_tst.o compile
I cannot reproduce on Solaris as of today, neither with the 64-bit compiler
nor with the 32-bit multiarch one.
--
Eric Botcazou
Guys,
The proposed solution WORKS!
I inserted the typename keyword as recomended and the program compiled
perfectly.
I feel sorry for the two messages. When I first tried to send a message, the
browser got frozen and I did a refresh.
I would like to thanks and I will report this flaw to SGI.
Hi,
I tried to add myself to the CC list of a PR (27397), but get the
following error message:
"You tried to change the Keywords field from ice-on-invalid-code,
error-recovery, monitored to error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code,
monitored, but only the assignee or reporter of the bug, or a s
Hello everybody,
I'd like to participate in SoC, but first of all to get your feedback
about project choice before submitting a proposal.
I've done some GCC work a few years ago: I was involved with the DJGPP
port, also done several minor bugfixes outside that in the
infrastructure. So I have so
On May 1, 2006, at 9:17 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
It amazes me that svn can't do a merge.
You obviously have not read the documentation nor browsed the GCC
wiki.
Doing merges with svn is amazingly simple.
I look forward to your answer I put to Ben.
Yes. I know it doesn't fail on IA64-HPUX. The reason is
that the dereferencing expression has been transformed as:
tmpvar = index+offset;
*tmpvar;
during induction variable optimization, Where tmpvar has SImode.
PPC has different costs to compute induction variables as on IA64-HPUX.
C
On May 1, 2006, at 8:58 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On 5/2/06, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It amazes me that svn can't do a merge.
Just because you can't do it, doesn't mean svn can't do it.
Let me know if you can reproduce what I see with your version of
svn. Feel free to answer
On May 1, 2006, at 8:48 PM, Ben Elliston wrote:
It amazes me that svn can't do a merge.
That's patently inaccurate.
Ok, try this out:
mrs $ mkdir svn-repo
mrs $ svnadmin create svn-repo
mrs $ svn co file:///Volumes/mrs4/svn-repo svn
Checked out revision 0.
mrs $ cd svn
mrs $ svn mkdir trunk
On 02 May 2006 16:26, trincheira wrote:
Ok, it's hard to see what's going on, because somebody somewhere has mistaken
everything between angle-braces for borked HTML tags and stripped them, which
is /really/ not good for a template example of all things (!), but I'm going to
try a bit of a g
>
> On a system which supports 64-bit implementation but with TARGET_ILP32
> ABI, like HPUX on ia64, the gcc-4.1 compiler generates incorrect code
> for the dejagnu test gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23386.c. The problem seems
> because that the gen_addr_rtx() in tree-ssa-address.c always returns
> Pmode rt
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:09:28AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >I've stumbled onto a problem with the OpenMP REDUCTION clause
> >
> >gfortran segfault on compile (gfortran -fopenmp array_reduction.f90)
> >with the following message:
> >arrayreduction.f90: In function 'foo':
> >arrayreduction.f90:
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 08:26 -0700, trincheira wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> I am developing some applications that extensively uses STL. I plan to use
> the
> traits -> iterator_traits to get information about which type do I need to
> return.
> Unfortunately, I've been experienced some problems to u
Hello Guys,
I am developing some applications that extensively uses STL. I plan to use
the
traits -> iterator_traits to get information about which type do I need to
return.
Unfortunately, I've been experienced some problems to use such
functionality.
This simple test code was extracted from t
Hello Guys,
I am developing some applications that extensively uses STL. I plan to use
the
traits -> iterator_traits to get information about which type do I need to
return.
Unfortunately, I've been experienced some problems to use such
functionality.
This simple test code was extracted from t
Are there any special switches or options needed to compile the ada
package with the core gcc? I add the C++ libraries and they compile right
along with the core. I've tried --enable-languages=c,c++,ada too and that
doesn't do the ada libraries.
Bill
hello from thread 1
hello from thread 0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
1
Intel 9.1 compiles but [Abort]s on execution.
gfortran
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-linux
Configured with: ../gcc/configure
--prefix=/cosmic/coudert/tmp/gfortran-20060502/irun
--enable-languages=c,fortr
On 02 May 2006 14:09, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Everytime I compile gcc I see that libiberty is being compiled. Is this
> a needed library
Yes. Gcc uses the support functions it provides. It's compiled and
statically linked in to the new gcc.
> I'm using glibc-2.1 and
> I'd like to figu
Everytime I compile gcc I see that libiberty is being compiled. Is this
a needed library and if not how can I switch it off? I'm using glibc-2.1 and
I'd like to figure out compiling 2.3 and I've done it before so I just have
to remember how. I want to cut down on all that compile time.
Bill
On 5/2/06, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/2/06, Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just noticed that size_type_node is signed in fortran frontend
> (it caused an ice for me because unsigned_type_for returns it for
> pointers, and I inserted an assert th
On 5/2/06, Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have just noticed that size_type_node is signed in fortran frontend
(it caused an ice for me because unsigned_type_for returns it for
pointers, and I inserted an assert that the result of unsigned_type_for
is unsigned).
According to t
Hello,
I have just noticed that size_type_node is signed in fortran frontend
(it caused an ice for me because unsigned_type_for returns it for
pointers, and I inserted an assert that the result of unsigned_type_for
is unsigned).
According to the comment in tree.h, size_type_node should correspond
Hi
We have an application compiled with gcc written in C++.
This application generates dynamically code and executes it, using a
JIT, a Just In time Compiler. Everything is working OK until the C++
code generates a throw.
To get to the corresponding catch, the runtime should skip through the
On 01 May 2006 19:43, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I would like to know who supports pdp11 for 3.4.6 or even the latest 4.x
> version of gcc? Is it still being maintained ? I'm trying to cross compile a
> pdp11 on my i686 and I'm having problems. If I can talk to the maintainer(s)
> I can get some
On 01 May 2006 20:55, DJ Delorie wrote:
> At this point, I would like some feedback about the API and how to
> cleanly (namespace-wise) add it to libgcc.a.
Um, I know it's a bit bikeshedcolour, and sorry about that, but wouldn't a
target-dependent builtin be a better fit to this kind of problem
35 matches
Mail list logo
