[Bug c/27489] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE on broken switch condition

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27489

[Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types

--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:34 --- P5: F95 is not release-critical. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/27489] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE on broken switch condition

--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:35 --- Is there a URL for the patch posted for this bug? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27489

[Bug c++/27491] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE on variable initialization

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27491

[Bug c/27490] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE on broken sizeof expression

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27490

[Bug c++/27492] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE on invalid covariant return type

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27492

[Bug tree-optimization/27549] [4.1 Regression] ICE in coalesce_abnormal_edges

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27549

[Bug objc/27438] [4.1/4.2 Regression] '_OBJC_INSTANCE_0' defined but not used warning (unit at a time)

--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:33 --- P5: Objective-C is not release-critical. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/27565] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in assign_stack_temp_for_type for vectors with SPE

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27565

[Bug target/27566] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICEs in final_scan_insn and reload_cse_simplify_operands for vectors with SPE

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566

[Bug debug/27574] [4.1/4.2 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable in a C++ constructor

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27574

[Bug tree-optimization/27603] [4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong code, apparently due to bad VRP

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27603

[Bug tree-optimization/27603] [4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong code, apparently due to bad VRP

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:42 --- Is there a reason why this is not a P1? This is wrong code. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/27603] [4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong code, apparently due to bad VRP

--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:43 --- My mistake; I had thought it was only generating wrong-code with non-default options. I have adjusted this to P1. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/27406] gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c fails on sh64-*-linux-gnu with -O2

--- Comment #1 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:52 --- Subject: Bug 27406 Author: kkojima Date: Sun May 14 22:51:12 2006 New Revision: 113766 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113766 Log: PR rtl-optimization/27406 * bt-load.c

[Bug libfortran/27575] gfortran - does not generate error when trying to read too much data

--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 23:46 --- Confirmed. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/27406] gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c fails on sh64-*-linux-gnu with -O2

--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 00:31 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/27613] New: compile fails with Unclassifiable statement error message

The following code fails to compile with the error message: In file test.f90:14 stuff = stuff+stuff(n+1) 1 Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1) The program test.f90: program test integer :: stuff write(*, *) called stuff , stuff(1), times end program test recursive function

[Bug fortran/27613] compile fails with Unclassifiable statement error message

--- Comment #1 from nicolasbock at gmail dot com 2006-05-15 01:14 --- I would like to add the output of $ gfortran -v -save-temps test.f90 Driving: gfortran -v -save-temps test.f90 -lgfortranbegin -lgfortran -shared-libgcc Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/27603] [4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong code, apparently due to bad VRP (-O2)

--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 04:36 --- Investigating a fix. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/22563] [4.0/4.1 Regression] performance regression for gcc newer than 2.95

--- Comment #15 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 04:43 --- Subject: Bug 22563 Author: sayle Date: Mon May 15 04:43:05 2006 New Revision: 113775 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113775 Log: PR rtl-optimization/22563 Backports from

[Bug target/27593] bad code generation

--- Comment #6 from philipp at marek dot priv dot at 2006-05-15 05:17 --- CFLAGS:=-g -mmcu=$(MCU) -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -mcall-prologues -I/usr/avr/include -I/home/flip/cprogs/AVR/include -funroll-loops -save-temps %.s: %.c $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -Os -S $ The .i results from

[Bug tree-optimization/25737] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS c974001 c974013 hang with struct aliasing

--- Comment #25 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 05:36 --- (I've not fully understood the discussion here, but if everything in Ada is addressable, then it seems to me that everything should have TREE_ADDRESSABLE set.) Grumpf... you read a little too quickly, that

[Bug tree-optimization/27603] [4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong code, apparently due to bad VRP (-O2)

--- Comment #8 from ian at airs dot com 2006-05-15 05:41 --- Steven: what's your patch? It seems to me that this fixes the problem in mainline: Index: tree-ssa-loop-niter.c === --- tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (revision

[Bug tree-optimization/27603] [4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong code, apparently due to bad VRP (-O2)

--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 05:44 --- (In reply to comment #8) integer_nonzerop should be used instead of !integer_zerop. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00587.html. -- Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27603

<    1   2