On Jun 9, 2006, at 6:31 PM, Pedro Lamarão wrote:
Currently I have implemented in g++ the Static Assertions and the
Right Angle Brackets C++0x features in g++. Those are the simplest
ones that got into the working draft
Any feedback is welcome!
Well, I hope that you are able to do up the
Andrew Pinski wrote:
Caused by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2006-06/msg00225.html
I committed this fix.
Tom
2006-06-10 Thomas Fitzsimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* configure.ac (ac_configure_args): Add --disable-plugin.
(--enable-gtk-cairo): Remove option.
* configure:
Thanks for the reply. I have tried this but when I check out GCC source
using SVN, It is 1.38 GB. I have space problem on my system so it is
difficult to check out all supported tool sources and make combined tree.
I am not able to understand, why the checkout source of GCC is so large in
size? I
On Jun 10, 2006, at 12:30 AM, Monika Sapra wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I have tried this but when I check out GCC
source
using SVN, It is 1.38 GB. I have space problem on my system so it is
difficult to check out all supported tool sources and make combined
tree.
Ha, that's nothing, you
Hello,
I'm looking for an induction variable analysis which will operate at the
GIMPLE level. So far, I've found...
loop-iv.c -- RTL induction variable analysis
tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c -- GIMPLE induction variable analysis
no, tree-level induction variable analysis is in
Monika Sapra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the reply. I have tried this but when I check out GCC source
using SVN, It is 1.38 GB.
Try upgrading subversion. With version 1.3+, the checked out tree is only
about half the size.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 10, 2006, at 12:23 AM, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
Andrew Pinski wrote:
Caused by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2006-06/msg00225.html
I committed this fix.
Did you know trunk of GCC is in release branch and has been since
Thursday?
-- Pinski
Andrew,
What is the release branch called? I can't get anything pulled down with...
svn co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_2-branch gcc
Our isn't it in the svn repository yet.
Jack
On Jun 10, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Andrew,
What is the release branch called? I can't get anything pulled
down with...
There is no release branch but the release branch rules are in effect
on the mainline (trunk).
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-06/msg00120.html
Andrew Pinski writes:
On Jun 10, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Andrew,
What is the release branch called? I can't get anything pulled
down with...
There is no release branch but the release branch rules are in effect
on the mainline (trunk).
See
Snapshot gcc-4.2-20060610 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20060610/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On Jun 9, 2006, at 9:31 PM, Pedro Lamarão wrote:
Any feedback is welcome!
Thank you!
-Howard
One imagines that one would construct a virtual machine architecture
framework
gcc already has one. It's called RTL.
and then write a back-end that would generate machine code for
that virtual machine, which would be a subset of ANSI C. Hey-presto, you
then have a butt-ugly
On 09/06/06, Eric Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I like b) the most. That way people who are accustomed to
using -Wconversion for value conversions can continue doing so and we
can move to something like -Wprototype-conversion or something for
the other (and stick the second in
On Jun 10, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
On 09/06/06, Eric Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I like b) the most. That way people who are accustomed to
using -Wconversion for value conversions can continue doing so and we
can move to something like
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006, Joe Buck wrote:
Also what about moving the News up to a noticeable spot since right now
it is down in a corner so it looks out of place. In fact on my screen
which is set to 1024x768, I have to scroll to get to the news.
Yes, the top news needs to be on the front page,
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Attach is what I see currently on the web page, the news is down low in the
lower right.
Barely noticeable.
Ack. Would you mind sending another screenshot tomorrow evening your time? ;-)
Gerald
Manuel López-Ibáñez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| (b) keep the warnings of conversions that may change a value in
| Wconversion and move its original purpose (the warnings about
| prototypes causing ... in the absence of a prototype) to a new option
| (suggestions are welcome).
I prefer
Testing of libstdc++ with an installed toolchain was broken by
2006-06-06 Benjamin Kosnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* testsuite/util: New directory.
[...]
g++ -g -O2 -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERT -fmessage-length=0 -DLOCALEDIR=.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27984
--- Comment #1 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-10 14:10 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27952
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00536.html
--
--- Comment #2 from patrik dot hagglund at bredband dot net 2006-06-10
14:45 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Why is this that bad of a warning,
I didn't said it was a bad warning per se (did I?). What I want to do is to be
able to prioritize between warnings to be able to cope with the
--- Comment #34 from arno at heho dot snv dot jussieu dot fr 2006-06-10
18:00 ---
(In reply to comment #30)
This patch works great for me.
Tested on i386-freebsd6 and i386-linux-2.6.15-gentoo by calling CNI in threads
created by an absolute non-CNI aware c++ Corba library.
--
--- Comment #3 from digitale at digitaleric dot net 2006-06-10 18:01
---
Subject: Re: gcc emits (undefined) ffreep opcode which
is not understood by Solaris' /usr/ccs/bin/as when tuning for Athlon or
Opteron CPUs
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
It's got something to do with two occurances of the object Action in the
attached test vis:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gcj -d . -I . -C one/ExitNotificationObserver.java
one/AddTaskObserverAction.java one/TaskAction.java
one/ExitNotificationObserver.java: In class 'one.ExitNotificationObserver':
--- Comment #1 from cagney at redhat dot com 2006-06-10 18:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=11649)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11649action=view)
source code for compile
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27985
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-10 20:27 ---
I have a tentative patch for this problem that I'm testing now.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #56 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-10 22:22
---
complit1.C has an internal error now on powerpc-darwin:
Foo::Foo(int, int)
complit1.C:14: error: ISO C++ forbids assignment of arrays
Foo::Foo(int, int) Foo::Foo(int, int)
Analyzing compilation unitPerforming
in the following code gcc choses the registers in such a way that it causes
itself an extra copy for every loop iteration and has to jump past the copy to
start the loop... it's probably easiest to describe just by looking at the
code:
% cat jmp-over.c
void foo(int *v, int *d, int g)
{
int s =
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-10 22:32 ---
PPC gives:
_foo:
lwz r2,4(r3)
b L2
L7:
mr r2,r0
L2:
lwz r0,0(r4)
addi r4,r4,4
add r0,r2,r0
cmpw cr7,r0,r5
blt+ cr7,L7
stw r2,0(r3)
blr
30 matches
Mail list logo
