Hi,
I've tried to build openoffice using gcc-4.1.0, but failed with the
following message:
Building project store
=
/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/OOB680_m5/store/source
-
/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/OOB680_m5/store/util
--
Making: ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libstore.so.3
Benjamin Redelings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> substitution.o:(.data+0x0): multiple definition of
> `_ZN5boost7numeric5ublas21scalar_divides_assignIT_T0_E8computedE'
I can't make sense of that as a mangled name. It has template
parameter references but no template definition. That suggests th
Hi,
I have some software that uses the BOOST matrix library UBLAS (1.33.1).
With GCC 4.1.1 this software compile fine (Debian Linux system - GNU
ld). However, with GCC 4.2 I get lots of errors, but I am not sure if
this is a bug or not:
substitution.o:(.data+0x0): multiple definition of
`
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> void longcpy(long* _dst, long* _src, unsigned _numwords)
> {
> asm volatile (
> "cld \n\t"
> "rep \n\t"
> "movsl \n\t"
> // Outputs
> :
> // Inputs
> : "S" (_src), "D" (_dst), "c" (_numwords)
Ok, I think I have tracked this down to having broken the aliasing
rules, and for the sake of completeness, here was the problem:
Recall that the (big picture) code works fine at -O2, but fails at
-O3. The problem seemed to stem from this inline assembly function:
void longcpy(long* _dst, long* _
Niklaus wrote:
when i executed a.out on sparc machine it segfaulted and dumped core.
On what kind of sparc machine? It sounds like you tried to run the code
on a sparc-solaris or sparc-linux machine, which won't work. sparc-elf
code can only be run on bare hardware.
Try building a cross g
Monika Sapra wrote:
I am not able to understand, why the checkout source of GCC is so large in
size? I am using the following command to checkout source:
See the info in the wiki. It talks about ways to reduce disk space.
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SvnHelp
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http
Ori Bernstein wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:36:49 -0700, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Free software is all about collaboration with third parties, as I'm
>> sure that the SoC people are well aware.
>
> True. I'd still suggest asking and making sure, since I know for a fact that
> stu
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:36:49 -0700, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Free software is all about collaboration with third parties, as I'm
> sure that the SoC people are well aware.
True. I'd still suggest asking and making sure, since I know for a fact that
students aren't allowed to work toge
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:36:35PM -0500, Ori Bernstein wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:26:41 -0400, Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > How could SoC rules in any way restrict what third
> > parties can do?
>
> It would restrict whether he could collaborate with a 3rd party.
Free soft
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:26:41 -0400, Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> How could SoC rules in any way restrict what third
> parties can do?
It would restrict whether he could collaborate with a 3rd party.
--
When does summertime come to Minnesota, you ask? Well, last year, I
think it wa
Ori Bernstein wrote:
Perhaps you could collaborate with him, or (as I believe the Summer of Code
rules might require) build off his work after it gets submitted. I'd suggest
you contact the Mono project about it.
How could SoC rules in any way restrict what third
parties can do?
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:50:13 +0200, Roberto COSTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working for an R&D organization of STMicroelectronics. Within our
> team we have decided to write a gcc back-end that produces CIL binaries
> (compliant with ECMA specification, see
> http://www.ecma-
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:50:13 +0200, Roberto COSTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working for an R&D organization of STMicroelectronics. Within our
> team we have decided to write a gcc back-end that produces CIL binaries
> (compliant with ECMA specification, see
> http://www.ecma-
2006/6/12, Niklaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
int main()
{
return 3;
}
i compiled it using sparc-elf-gcc -c test.c.
./sparc-elf-ld --entry=main test.o -o a.out
when i executed a.out on sparc machine it segfaulted and dumped core.
I guess 'cos you set entrypoint=main instead of __start or whatever it
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This was caused by:
> 2006-01-22 Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * genautomata.c: Include vec.h, not varray.h.
>
>
> The problem that Mark reported happens because (since always) the CFLAGS
> of the gcc directory are just "-g", not "-O2 -g". Optimized bui
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:00:36PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Roberto COSTA wrote:
> > It looks like you don't assume such an approval as granted... may I ask
> > you why?
>
> Because they have a history of not granting such things, believing that
> it serves to hinder, not further, the goal o
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:20:20PM +0200, Riccardo wrote:
> Does anyboby know where I ccan find an algorithm to parse a propositional
> logic formula and obtain the associated binary tree? thanks
Please don't ask questions like that on this list.
Roberto COSTA wrote:
> Diego Novillo wrote:
>> Sebastian Pop wrote on 06/12/06 12:40:
>>
>>
>>> This page has no discussion about a CIL backend.
>>>
>> Note that I never said 'CIL'. I specifically said 'bytecode
>> representation'. The work being done for LTO will have some points in
>> common wi
On Jun 12, 2006, at 5:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, my point above was that -strict-aliasing is included in -O2 and
my code works fine at -O2. Only -O3 causes problems, so I didn't
expect
-fno-strict-aliasing to make any difference.
Code in violation of the aliasing rules can appear
Diego Novillo wrote:
Sebastian Pop wrote on 06/12/06 12:40:
This page has no discussion about a CIL backend.
Note that I never said 'CIL'. I specifically said 'bytecode
representation'. The work being done for LTO will have some points in
common with an effort to build a CIL backend.
Th
On Jun 12, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Could one of the SC people bring this question one level up?
I don't know if this is relevant at this point but GCC did have
at one point did have a Java byte code outputter but it was
removed on the request of RMS.
-- Pinski
Diego Novillo wrote:
> > The document in which Mark has announced the LTO briefly mentions
> > that CIL was not retained for dumping the IR, without giving an
> > explicit reason, so I think that we need a clear position from the
> > FSF whether such a backend is accepted to be part of GCC.
> >
Sebastian Pop wrote on 06/12/06 12:40:
> This page has no discussion about a CIL backend.
>
Note that I never said 'CIL'. I specifically said 'bytecode
representation'. The work being done for LTO will have some points in
common with an effort to build a CIL backend.
> The document in which Ma
Diego Novillo wrote:
> Roberto COSTA wrote on 06/12/06 03:50:
>
> > Every so often CIL looks to poke in the works of the mailing list, but I
> > haven't been able to track the current status of the discussion on the
> > topic.
> >
> We have started work on a bytecode representation that will initi
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
Daniel> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:22:17AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Typing "make" in the gcc subdirectory does not do what I expect.
Daniel> Then could you clarify what happens, and what you expect, please?
The behavior prior to the top-level bootst
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:22:17AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Typing "make" in the gcc subdirectory does not do what I expect.
Then could you clarify what happens, and what you expect, please?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
Paolo> So, let's please not confuse issues. I work in the GCC directory daily.
Paolo> I type "make" there and it just works. You can even type "make
Paolo> quickstrap" if you want:
Paolo> I think this was your suggestion, and it was implemented.
Typing "ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Well, my point above was that -strict-aliasing is included in -O2 and
> my code works fine at -O2. Only -O3 causes problems, so I didn't expect
> -fno-strict-aliasing to make any difference.
That doesn't follow at all. -O3 exposes much more information to the
co
Does anyboby know where I ccan find an algorithm to parse a propositional
logic formula and obtain the associated binary tree? thanks
Hi,
I have been trying to build sparc elf executables from i386. I got
gcc,binutils and newlibc and configured them with target=sparc-elf .
Now when i got gcc and binutils working , i wrote a small program
test.c:
int main()
{
return 3;
}
i compiled it using sparc-elf-gcc -c test.c.
./sparc-elf-
Daniel Berlin wrote on 06/09/06 19:32:
>> /* This structure is for generic trees. */
>> struct tree_common GTY(())
>> {
>> struct tree_base base;
>> tree chain;
>> tree type;
>> union tree_ann_d *ann;
>> };
> Why is there a chain in tree_common?
>
To avoid wholesale conversion. Initially
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:40:18PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:30:50PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:21:21PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > > On 6/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:30:50PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:21:21PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > On 6/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:21:21PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On 6/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I'm starting to be a little suspicious about host2little()
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:30:50PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:21:21PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On 6/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I'm starting to be a l
Steven Bosscher wrote on 06/09/06 19:12:
> For gimple temporaries, are you planning on something different from
> the current minimal decl (tree_decl_with_vis in tree.h; needs
> re-indenting btw...)?
>
I was hoping to get away with just type, but I'm not sure if that's
possible yet.
>> /* All tr
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:21:21PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On 6/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm starting to be a little suspicious about host2little(). I wonder
> >> if that's well-defined.
Richard Guenther writes:
> On 6/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm starting to be a little suspicious about host2little(). I wonder
> > > if that's well-defined.
> > >
> > > I'm just guessing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >
> > I'm starting to be a little suspicious about host2little(). I wonder
> > if that's well-defined.
> >
> > I'm just guessing here becasue I can't see the code. Is it possible
>
> templat
On 6/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> I'm starting to be a little suspicious about host2little(). I wonder
> if that's well-defined.
>
> I'm just guessing here becasue I can't see the code. Is it possible
Roberto COSTA wrote on 06/12/06 03:50:
> Every so often CIL looks to poke in the works of the mailing list, but I
> haven't been able to track the current status of the discussion on the
> topic.
>
We have started work on a bytecode representation that will initially be
used for link-time optimiza
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> I'm starting to be a little suspicious about host2little(). I wonder
> if that's well-defined.
>
> I'm just guessing here becasue I can't see the code. Is it possible
template T swap_endian(T x)
{
char* a = reint
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:32:36PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > I want a reduced test case for this problem for bugzilla, but don't
> > > really know the exact cause. I _think_ code is being improperly
> > > optimized away, but I
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:32:36PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I want a reduced test case for this problem for bugzilla, but don't
> > really know the exact cause. I _think_ code is being improperly
> > optimized away, but I don't know. This function is part of a
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I want a reduced test case for this problem for bugzilla, but don't
> really know the exact cause. I _think_ code is being improperly
> optimized away, but I don't know. This function is part of a
> BigInteger library, and works perfectly upto and including -O2, but
I want a reduced test case for this problem for bugzilla, but don't
really know the exact cause. I _think_ code is being improperly
optimized away, but I don't know. This function is part of a
BigInteger library, and works perfectly upto and including -O2, but
produces bogus results at -O3, unless
David Edelsohn wrote:
Mark Mitchell writes:
Mark> That seems unfortunate, but so be it.
Yes it is very unfortunate and not very convenient for the way
that most developers want to use the build infrastructure. There no
longer is an equivalent to "make quickstrap". To rebuild only GCC
Eric Fisher wrote:
/src/gcc-3.2.1/configure --target=mipsel-elf \
--prefix=/gnutools --enable-languages=c,c++ \
--with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-newlib \
--without-headers --disable-shared --disable-threads
Build and install GCC
make
Wrong command, use 'make all-gcc ; make install-gcc', th
> These are pngcrushed versions with linear dimensions between 50% and 80% of
> the 200-pixel-high original.
how about using a svg image as a master instead of a png? It could be
scaled without loss. I attached a svg produced from the original png.
Thomas
gcc.svg.bz2
Description: Binary data
Hello,
I'm working for an R&D organization of STMicroelectronics. Within our
team we have decided to write a gcc back-end that produces CIL binaries
(compliant with ECMA specification, see
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-335.htm).
Our main motivation is the abili
hi,
I configure GCC as follow:
PATH=/gnutools/bin:$PATH ; export PATH
mkdir -p /tmp/build/gcc
cd /tmp/build/gcc
/src/gcc-3.2.1/configure --target=mipsel-elf \
--prefix=/gnutools --enable-languages=c,c++ \
--with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-newlib \
--without-headers --disable-shared --disable-t
52 matches
Mail list logo
