On 6/19/06, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using -mfpmath=sse -msse2 is a workaround if you have a processor that supports
SSE2 instructions. As opposed to -ffloat-store, it works reliably and
with no performance
impact.
Such slab test can be turned into a branchless sequence of SS
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:12:29PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > The computation of the address of x was moved outside the
> > conditional--that is, both the rdhwr and the addu moved. You'll have
> > to figure out why. gcc shouldn't move instr
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:12:29PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> The computation of the address of x was moved outside the
> conditional--that is, both the rdhwr and the addu moved. You'll have
> to figure out why. gcc shouldn't move instructions outside of a
> conditional unless they are chea
On Jun 18, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Mike Stein wrote:
Is someone else interested in the daily output
Or while (1) do, if you have the bandwidth... :-)
But, please, just email the results to yourself and try that for a
week. :-)
This will help shake out the trivial things. You'll also need to ad
Hi,
I have a question about the "Clean up how cse works" project on
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/optimize.html
Let me first explain what I am trying to do. I have seen Vlad's patch
to make CSE path following remember its state at the end of a path, so
that when a new path is followed, a re-scan i
>
> "kernel coder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (define_mode_attr divide_condition
> > [DF (SF "!TARGET_FIX_SB1 || flag_unsafe_math_optimizations")])
> > ;; (V2SF "TARGET_SB1 && (!TARGET_FIX_SB1 ||
> > flag_unsafe_math_optimizations)")])
> >
> >
> > As you can see i just omitted the en
"kernel coder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > V2SF will be created by the line
> > VECTOR_MODES (FLOAT, 8);
>
> Yes you are absolutely right.When i changed the name of file
> ABC-modes.def to 1ABC-modes.def ,i got the following error
>
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target
> `../../gcc-4.1.
V2SF will be created by the line
VECTOR_MODES (FLOAT, 8);
Yes you are absolutely right.When i changed the name of file
ABC-modes.def to 1ABC-modes.def ,i got the following error
make[1]: *** No rule to make target
`../../gcc-4.1.0/gcc/config/ABC/ABC-modes.def', needed by
`build/genmodes.o'.
"kernel coder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But when i issued the make all-gcc command .Following error occured
>
> ../../gcc-4.1.0/gcc/config/ABC/ABC.md: unknown mode `V2SF'
>
> Would u please explain why this error is being generated.Also a bit of
> explaination of 'V2SF' mode will helpful.
Hello,
As a followup to my previous message enquiring about the intent
underlying various addressability checks in the gimplifier, attached
is an example of patch which addresses the issues we're observing.
It for instance fixes an ICE in in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 on the
testcase below:
proc
On 6/19/06, Seongbae Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/19/06, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19 June 2006 00:04, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> > Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> >
> >> ... I suspect there is something wrong with your
> >> code (possibly invoking some undefined
David Daney kirjoitti:
kernel coder wrote:
hi,
I'm trying to cross compile gcc-4.1.0 for mipsel
platform.Following is the sequence of commands which i'm using
../gcc-4.1.0/configure --target=mipsel --without-headres
--prefix=/home/shahzad/install/ --with-newlib --enable-languages=c
Perhap
> By the way, -ftrapv only works on integral types.
When it works. Last time I took a look, it was easily wiped out by
optimization.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 6/19/06, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19 June 2006 00:04, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
>
>> ... I suspect there is something wrong with your
>> code (possibly invoking some undefined behavior, using uninitialized
>> variable, sensitivity to roundi
> I'd like to catch automatically over/underflows on floating point
> and integer arithmetic. I thought -ftrapv would do the trick but I
> don't really understand how it works.
By the way, -ftrapv only works on integral types.
Ben
hi,
I'm trying to port gcc for a processor which is very similar to
MIPS.Today i just tried to compile gcc-4.1.0 for this processor by
changing configuration files.
First i changed the config.sub file in base directory and just added
the name of processor ABC.
Then i changed the configure.ac file
Ross Ridge wrote:
>Hmm? I don't see how the "Lua-style" coroutines you're looking are any
>lightweight than what Maurizio Vitale is looking for. They're actually
>more heavyweight because you need to implement some method of returning
>values to the "coroutine" being yeilded to.
Dustin Laurence
On 19 June 2006 00:04, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
>
>> ... I suspect there is something wrong with your
>> code (possibly invoking some undefined behavior, using uninitialized
>> variable, sensitivity to rounding errors, or something like that).
>>
>>
> A da
18 matches
Mail list logo
