On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:27:49PM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> (define_expand "reload_outqi"
> [(clobber (match_operand:QI 0 "memory_operand" "=Q"))
>(clobber (match_operand:DI 2 "register_operand" "=&r"))
>(set (match_dup 4) (match_dup 5))
>(parallel [
>(set (match_
Apparently I forgot to CC this to the list last time, so here is a new attempt!
Fredrik, if you can modify the source: if any line in a source file
is touched, you'll get a .da file. So you could add a dummy routine
to each file and call them all at startup. That will be an easier
project than
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 04:37:41PM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> ;; This is primarily a hack for the Nintendo DS external RAM.
> (define_insn "_arm_movqi_insn_swp"
> [(set (match_operand:QI 0 "reg_or_Qmem_operand" "=r,r,r,Q,Q")
> (match_operand:QI 1 "general_operand" "rI,K,m,r,r"
Using gcc-4.1.1. Info says variable-length array is supported in c++ mode,
but doesn't seem to work:
#include
#include
template
void F (in_t const& in, int size, int x[size]) {}
void G (std::vector const& in, int size, int x[size]) {}
int main () {
std::vector i (10);
int x (10);
F (i,
Hi,
my daily build for s390(x) still shows the 2 following
gfortran testcases failing on the 4.0 branch:
actual_array_constructor_2.f90 (#28167)
actual_array_substr_2.f90 (#28174)
Both were committed with rev. 115186 for gcc 4.1 and with rev. 115185
for 4.0 by Alexandre Oliva. The patch
On 7/21/06, Andreas Krebbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a fix for 4.0? If not, should we remove the testcases or mark them
as xfail - just to polish the test summary a bit ;-)
IMHO backporting any fortran patches to 4.0 is a waste of time. There
are so many known bugs in the gfortran th
On 19 Jun 2006 16:45:43 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure, because I'm not sure what is hoisting the instruction.
>
> I tried recreating this, but I couldn't. I get this:
>
> foo:
> .frame $sp,0,$31 # vars= 0, regs= 0/0, args= 0, gp= 0
>
Atsushi Nemoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And with r108713 I got:
>
> foo:
> .frame $sp,0,$31 # vars= 0, regs= 0/0, args= 0, gp= 0
> .mask 0x,0
> .fmask 0x,0
> .setnoreorder
> .cpload $25
> .setnomacro
>
>
On Jul 21, 2006, at 7:14 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Using gcc-4.1.1. Info says variable-length array is supported in c+
+ mode,
but doesn't seem to work
Nope, sure doesn't. I don't recall any good reason why we can't
support it. I'd file a bug report for it.
Being able to compile c99 style
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20060721 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20060721/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
10 matches
Mail list logo