Re: libffi on Darwin PPC at -m64

2006-09-19 Thread Andreas Tobler
Jack Howarth wrote: Has anyone ever run the libffi testsuite when built at -m64 on Darwin PPC? It appears that every single test fails at -m64 on execution. Jack Sigh, I can't resist! There is _NO_ 64-bit libffi port for darwin ppc.

Re: Type yielded by TARGET_VECTORIZE_BUILTIN_MASK_FOR_LOAD hook?

2006-09-19 Thread Ira Rosen
"Erich Plondke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/09/2006 04:09:14: > On 9/19/06, Erich Plondke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/19/06, Ira Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Does this patch fix the problem? > > > > Well... seems pretty good. I get the instruction generated

Re: unwind, x86, DW_CFA_GNU_args_size

2006-09-19 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Aug 18, 2006, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Geoffrey Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On 18/08/2006, at 5:42 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> > We could avoid nesting memcpy calls on ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS >> > machines, in which case I think Alex's patch is unnecessary.

Re: Merging identical functions in GCC

2006-09-19 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Sep 18, 2006, Roman Kononov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Merge can be safely done like this: > If both functions A and B are not inlined functions, and they have > single entry points, and memcmp of their asm code is zero, and the > code is large enough, then the asm code of the functions B is

re: libffi on Darwin PPC at -m64

2006-09-19 Thread Jack Howarth
Okay, I mispoke...not every test fails on Darwin PPC at -m64... === libffi Summary for unix/-m32 === # of expected passes1068 # of expected failures 8 # of unsupported tests 8 === libffi Summary for unix/-m64 === # of expected pa

libffi on Darwin PPC at -m64

2006-09-19 Thread Jack Howarth
Has anyone ever run the libffi testsuite when built at -m64 on Darwin PPC? It appears that every single test fails at -m64 on execution. Jack

Re: question about -static-libgcc

2006-09-19 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:30:40AM -0400, Kate Minola wrote: > Ok, I say to myself, I understand this. The version of g++ that I am > using is one that I built in my home directory and so it's libgcc_s.so.1 > is only linked if I use -static-libgcc. Whereas without -static-libgcc, > I am linking w

question about -static-libgcc

2006-09-19 Thread Kate Minola
Perhaps a kind person would help clear up my confusion regarding -static-libgcc? Consider the following C++ program: foo.cc - using namespace std; #include int main (int argc, char *argv[]) { int DIGITS; DIGITS=14; pow(1./10,DIGITS); return 0; } ---

Re: what is ip , fp registers ?

2006-09-19 Thread Paul Brook
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 06:49, Chandan_Gupta-r65863 wrote: > Hi > > I am doing the assembly coding in ARM7TDMI and using the GNU Assembler. > In GNU ARM Assembler Quick Reference, I found 2 register Names which I > am not able to understand, they are ip & fp. ip is r12 and fp r11. Paul

RE: Upgrading a cross compiler from GCC 3.4.6 to 4.1.1

2006-09-19 Thread Dave Korn
On 19 September 2006 13:16, Rohit Arul Raj wrote: > Hi all, > > I am upgrading a cross compiler from gcc 3.4.6 to gcc 4.1.1. > > i just want to confirm whether the poisoned macro > FUNCTION_ARG_PASS_BY_REFERENCE in target.h is replaced by the target > hook in target.c as TARGET_PASS_BY_REFERENC

Upgrading a cross compiler from GCC 3.4.6 to 4.1.1

2006-09-19 Thread Rohit Arul Raj
Hi all, I am upgrading a cross compiler from gcc 3.4.6 to gcc 4.1.1. i just want to confirm whether the poisoned macro FUNCTION_ARG_PASS_BY_REFERENCE in target.h is replaced by the target hook in target.c as TARGET_PASS_BY_REFERENCE. Is there any log file other than ChangeLog which keeps the l

Re: Type yielded by TARGET_VECTORIZE_BUILTIN_MASK_FOR_LOAD hook?

2006-09-19 Thread Ira Rosen
Hi, Does this patch fix the problem? Ira Index: tree-vect-transform.c === --- tree-vect-transform.c (revision 117002) +++ tree-vect-transform.c (working copy) @@ -1916,10 +1916,10 @@ vectorizable_load (tree stmt, block_s