Re: SoC Project: Propagating array data dependencies from Tree-SSA to RTL

2007-03-25 Thread Ayal Zaks
"Daniel Berlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/03/2007 05:19:41: > On 3/23/07, Alexander Monakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > I would be pleased to see Ayal Zaks as my mentor, because proposed > > improvement is primarily targeted as modulo scheduling improvement. In > > case

Re: A question on ACX_BUGURL

2007-03-25 Thread Paolo Bonzini
> + no) BUGURL=""; just BUGURL= (no useless trailing semicolon). > + case ${BUGURL} in Please quote this as "$BUGURL". > +REPORT_BUGS_TO="<$BUGURL>" > +REPORT_BUGS_TEXI="@uref{`echo $BUGURL | sed 's/@/@@/g'`}" Please do this instead: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "$BUGURL" | sed 's/@/@@/

gcc4.1 compilation issue on solaris 10

2007-03-25 Thread Nitesh Shende
I am trying to build gcc with java support on solaris 10 I am getting lot of errors While compiling libjava.I am getting lot of errors for headers error: global qualification of class name is invalid before ':' token for all the header files ..seems to me some issue in Makefile

Re: RFC: integer division by multiply with invariant reciprocal

2007-03-25 Thread Jeffrey Law
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:24 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On 3/25/07, Charles J. Tabony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So I think that the easiest way to integrate this with the rest of the > > > compiler is to have a target hook that emits trees to compute SHIFT, INV1 > > > and INV2. > > I don'

Re: RFC: integer division by multiply with invariant reciprocal

2007-03-25 Thread Andrew Pinski
On 3/25/07, Charles J. Tabony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I think that the easiest way to integrate this with the rest of the > compiler is to have a target hook that emits trees to compute SHIFT, INV1 > and INV2. I don't think target hooks to expand trees early is a good idea. RTL is not

Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"

2007-03-25 Thread Andrew Pinski
On 3/25/07, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I couldn't find one so I've filed PR #31359. Apologies if it's a duplicate. I will again say, "undocumented extensions" don't exist (except for the case where the documentation is in the source and this was not one of those cases). This was jus

Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-03-22)

2007-03-25 Thread Mark Mitchell
Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >> Joseph, would you please take a look at PR 31136? Andrew believes this >> to be a front-end bug. > > I don't think this is a front-end bug. Thank you for investigating. > (OK to commit this patch to mainline > subject to

Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"

2007-03-25 Thread Ryan Hill
Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Was there ever any action on this? AFAICS consensus was that the trap >> would be removed and this behaviour be documented as an extension. >> There was a bit more discussion of how exactly the documentation would >> be worded[i]

Re: [patch] generated string libraries & -Wformat

2007-03-25 Thread Mark Mitchell
Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Bruce Korb wrote: > >> This bootstraps in Linux i686 & I can use -Wno-format-contains-nul to >> suppress that warning. OK? > > This is not a complete patch submission, I await one with documentation > and testcases (both for the option disabling the

Re: Does anybody know of testuites/testcases for shared library, dynamic loader, etc

2007-03-25 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Mayank Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am looking for testcases for testing the following on interix:- > 1: shared library support > 2: dynamic loader ld.so working > > Are then any comprehensive testsuites available for the same ? It's hardly comprehensive, and some of the tests are ELF s

Re: RFC: integer division by multiply with invariant reciprocal

2007-03-25 Thread Charles J. Tabony
> So I think that the easiest way to integrate this with the rest of the > compiler is to have a target hook that emits trees to compute SHIFT, INV1 > and INV2. (define_tree_expand "name" "condition" { preparation statements; } ) :-)

Does anybody know of testuites/testcases for shared library, dynamic loader, etc

2007-03-25 Thread Mayank Kumar
I am looking for testcases for testing the following on interix:- 1: shared library support 2: dynamic loader ld.so working Are then any comprehensive testsuites available for the same ? Thanks Mayank

Re: Linking shared libs against shared libs

2007-03-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:18:16PM +0200, Oliver Lange wrote: > I'm trying to link a shared library against a shared library, > using gcc/ld on Linux and with code like this: This is really more of a linker question. Followups to [EMAIL PROTECTED], please. > Compiling the sourcecode above like t

Linking shared libs against shared libs

2007-03-25 Thread Oliver Lange
Hello everyone, I'm trying to link a shared library against a shared library, using gcc/ld on Linux and with code like this: // // // test.c (shared library sourcecode) // extern int unknown_function(int value); int testfunc(void) { retur

RE: -fkeep-inline-functions and broken Cygwin bootstrap (was: Building GCC 4.3.0 on Cygwin...)

2007-03-25 Thread Dave Korn
On 25 March 2007 07:37, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On 3/24/07, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dave Korn wrote: >> >>> # 405 "/usr/include/stdio.h" 3 4 >> >> [ Which is from newlib (libc/include/stdio.h) if anyone reading this >> doesn't have a Cygwin system handy. ] >> >>> static __inl

RFC: integer division by multiply with invariant reciprocal

2007-03-25 Thread Joern Rennecke
The strategy that the SHMEDIA port uses to do cse and loop invariant code motion for division by invariant reciprocal can in principle be used by any processor that has a reasonable fast instructions for count leading sign bits (can be substituted with count leading zero bits), widening or highpart

4.3 bootstrap broken on i386-linux

2007-03-25 Thread FX Coudert
Hi all, My nightly bootstrap of mainline on i386-linux failed tonight, on revision 123192, with: /home/fxcoudert/gfortran_nightbuild/trunk/libgcc/../libdecnumber/ decLibrary.c: In function ?isinfd64?: /home/fxcoudert/gfortran_nightbuild/trunk/libgcc/../libdecnumber/ decLibrary.c:65: error: