--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-09
23:30 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 at -O1 and above
Any results? I cannot reproduce this on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.31 (neither the
original bug nor your testcase that gives
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:06
---
How on earth did that PR get assigned to me?
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:37
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33039 ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:38
---
This report is better than my own. :)
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31032
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32276
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:23
---
Closed, since Andrew says this can no longer be reproduced.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:25
---
Closed, as Sebastian says he cannot reproduce, and as Richard says there is
another testcase in PR31762.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:29
---
Apparently, this only affects libffi/java, so I've marked this P2, rather than
P1. However, build failures are nasty, since many people just do configure;
make.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:55
---
P5 unless/until a C/C++ testcase can be found; upgrade to P3 if found.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32964
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32914
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32898
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32855
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:51 ---
This is most likely caused by:
2005-09-09 Richard Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR debug/20998
* cp-tree.def (ALIAS_DECL): Remove.
* cp-lang.c (cp_init_ts): Remove support for it.
*
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32787
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32756
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:45
---
P5 until/unless a non-Ada example is found. Upgrade to P3 if so.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:44
---
I'm not convinced that there's anything to fix here; it sounds like we've just
traded which of two examples is better. If there is a bug here, please add a
note explaining, and upgrade back to P3.
--
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-10
00:41 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/nan_inf_fmt.f90 execution
Still can't reproduce this on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.31. I'm starting to think
that
printf might be broken there, after all.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32674
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32636
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32628
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:38 ---
What is 'gcjavac'?
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32624
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32596
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32586
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32565
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:30
---
I believe this to be valid code.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32546
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32557
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32566
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32567
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32607
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32716
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32722
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32772
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32845
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32912
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32967
--- Comment #4 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 01:37 ---
This should be fixed now.
I believe echristo bootstrapped with this flag just yesterday, in fact.
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 01:39 ---
This should be fixed now (it was a VN/PRE interaction)
I believe echristo bootstrapped with this flag just yesterday, in fact.
The testcase is certainly not crashing for me anymore
Please reopen if it is still
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 01:03 ---
C testcase (at -O3):
typedef float t[52];
void f(t * epstab, int ib, int ib2)
{
int i;
for(i = 0;i52;i++)
{
ib2 = ib+2;
(*epstab)[(ib)-1] = (*epstab)[(ib2)-1];
ib = ib2;
}
}
--
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33025
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33011
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33007
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32975
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33017
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33029
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32970
--- Comment #6 from echristo at apple dot com 2007-08-10 02:29 ---
I hadn't but I have now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32722
--- Comment #10 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-08-10 03:27
---
Hi ,
Any plans to backport.
regards
Satya
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32987
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 03:00
---
write_float uses isfinite (n) and isnan (n) to determine if Infinite or NaN
is emitted and in that case exits before calling output_float. So if execution
is reaching output_float, one or both of the
--- Comment #11 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-08-10 03:50 ---
Subject: Re: TAB in FORMAT: accept extension, warn with -std=f*
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 03:27:33AM -, satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in
wrote:
Any plans to backport.
No.
Please
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 04:02 ---
This was introduced in revision 127273.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-10
04:42 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/nan_inf_fmt.f90 execution
write_float uses isfinite (n) and isnan (n) to determine if Infinite or
NaN
is emitted and in that case exits before
--- Comment #10 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-10 05:48 ---
The patch works fine for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-08-10 05:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR33039
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00643.html
--
101 - 164 of 164 matches
Mail list logo