Status of the DLX backend for GCC?

2007-12-30 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
At http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/extensions.html we have a reference to the DLX port of GCC, which corresponds to the DLX machine described in Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach by Hennessy and Patterson. Sadly, the link to http://www-mount.ee.umn.edu/~okeefe/mcerg/gcc-dlx.html

Re: Status of the DLX backend for GCC?

2007-12-30 Thread nkavv
Hi Gerald and friends (what follows is a copy of a message sent earlier today to Gerald) At http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/extensions.html we have a reference to the DLX port of GCC, which corresponds to the DLX machine described in Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach by Hennessy

Re: Status of the DLX backend for GCC?

2007-12-30 Thread Serge Belyshev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Over the previous years, I had downloaded and used both a really archaic gcc-1.09 DLX backend as well as the one you refer too. They are both in a sad state of affairs, but the gcc-2.7.2.1 (AFAICR) was usable. Offtopic: if you still have such an old gcc-1.09 (?)

Re: Status of the DLX backend for GCC?

2007-12-30 Thread nkavv
Offtopic: if you still have such an old gcc-1.09 (?) release around, please make it available so it can be uploaded here: ftp://sourceware.org/pub/gcc/old-releases/ Oops, reality check :) My glibc version for DLX is 1.09. The GCC version seems to be either 1.37.1 or more probably 1.39.

[Bug rtl-optimization/11832] Optimization of common code in switch statements

2007-12-30 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-30 10:47 --- Created an attachment (id=14842) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14842action=view) rough, half-finished, disfunctional thought; not a patch The attached thoughts do not yet insert/remove stmt

[Bug c/34621] New: [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c:32: internal compiler error: in expand_call, at calls.c:2785

2007-12-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c fails at -Os with gcc version 4.3.0 20071230: /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c: In function 'main': /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c:32: internal compiler error: in expand_call, at calls.c:2785

[Bug c/34622] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c fails at -O1 and above

2007-12-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
-- Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/2801-4.c fails at -O1 and above Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc

[Bug c/34622] gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c fails at -O1 and above

2007-12-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-12-30 11:31 --- Oops! hit return before I finished. gcc.c-torture/execute/2801-4.c fails (execute) at -O1 and above with gcc versions 4.3.0 20071230, 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465), and 4.2.2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug tree-optimization/34534] Multiple gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_xxxx execution failures

2007-12-30 Thread olga at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from olga at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-30 11:52 --- (In reply to comment #2) Created an attachment (id=14802) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14802action=view) [edit] Dump files I looked a bit at the dump files you generated for

[Bug tree-optimization/34534] Multiple gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_xxxx execution failures

2007-12-30 Thread olga at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from olga at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-30 12:07 --- (In reply to comment #4) Is the last 'if' always should be true? I mean on any system... true-false, sorry. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34534

[Bug c/34623] New: gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_malloc_size_var.c:32: internal compiler error: Bus error

2007-12-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
I don't know if this is a duplicate of PR34534, but I get [ibook-dhum] f90/bug% /opt/gcc/i686-darwin/gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/i686-darwin/gcc/ /opt/gcc/gcc-4.3-work/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_malloc_size_var.c -O3 -fipa-struct-reorg -fdump-ipa-all -fwhole-program -combine -fipa-type-escape

[Bug middle-end/34483] wo_prof_two_strs.c:56: internal compiler error: in find_new_var_of_type, at ipa-struct-reorg.c:605

2007-12-30 Thread olga at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from olga at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-30 12:19 --- (In reply to comment #16) I think this is related to PR 34472 and PR 34534 true. Would you please see the comment #4 for PR 34534, and try it on your machine? Thank you, Olga --

[Bug tree-optimization/34534] Multiple gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_xxxx execution failures

2007-12-30 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-12-30 12:34 --- I also see the problem on i686-apple-darwin9, gcc version 4.3.0 20071230 with -m64 FAIL: gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_global_var.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_local_var.c execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/struct

[Bug c++/34624] New: valid c++ code doesn't compile for x86_64, but for i386

2007-12-30 Thread tim at klingt dot org
the following code compiles on i386, but not for x86_64: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++ -m32 bug.cpp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ g++ -m64 bug.cpp bug.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: bug.cpp:69: error: no matching function for call to ‘get_samples(my_tablefloat, 1024u)’ [EMAIL

[Bug target/34625] New: msgl-check.c:199: error: unrecognizable insn:

2007-12-30 Thread kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de
(*) This is actually running on i686-pc-linux-gnu, in a chroot which (with the help of Wine) masquerades as i686-pc-mingw32 so most packages can be compiled natively (cross support in general is weak, cross support to w32 even weaker). /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile

[Bug target/34625] msgl-check.c:199: error: unrecognizable insn:

2007-12-30 Thread kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de
--- Comment #1 from kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de 2007-12-30 14:04 --- Here's the output from -v: Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-mingw32 Configured with: /home/kai/.../CHROOT/MINGW/sources/gcc-4.2.2/configure --prefix=/home/kai/.../CHROOT/MINGW/Prefix

[Bug target/34625] msgl-check.c:199: error: unrecognizable insn:

2007-12-30 Thread kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de
--- Comment #2 from kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de 2007-12-30 14:09 --- Created an attachment (id=14843) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14843action=view) msgl-check.i Generated with -save-temps -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34625

[Bug target/34625] msgl-check.c:199: error: unrecognizable insn:

2007-12-30 Thread kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de
--- Comment #3 from kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de 2007-12-30 14:10 --- I should add that I saw the exact same error with 4.1.2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34625

[Bug target/34625] msgl-check.c:199: error: unrecognizable insn:

2007-12-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-30 14:40 --- This was supposed to be fixed in 4.2.0, see PR 29826. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34625

[Bug middle-end/34622] [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c fails at -O1 and above

2007-12-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-30 14:49 --- Most likely caused by: 2007-12-12 Aldy Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR tree-optimization/32901 * gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs): Handle the case when we are assigning from a constant

[Bug c/34623] gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_malloc_size_var.c:32: internal compiler error: Bus error

2007-12-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-30 14:54 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34483 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/34483] wo_prof_two_strs.c:56: internal compiler error: in find_new_var_of_type, at ipa-struct-reorg.c:605

2007-12-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-30 14:54 --- *** Bug 34623 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/34625] msgl-check.c:199: error: unrecognizable insn:

2007-12-30 Thread kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de
--- Comment #5 from kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de 2007-12-30 15:15 --- Still in gcc version 4.2.3 20071226 (prerelease). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34625

[Bug target/34625] msgl-check.c:199: error: unrecognizable insn:

2007-12-30 Thread kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de
--- Comment #6 from kai-gcc-bugs at khms dot westfalen dot de 2007-12-30 15:20 --- Hmm. Looking at PR 29826, this is indeed the same bug; maybe a different version of the mingw headers? And I wonder why I didn't find it when I searched for it ... --

[Bug tree-optimization/34534] Multiple gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_xxxx execution failures

2007-12-30 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #7 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-30 15:45 --- (In reply to comment #4) So I wonder whether this test works correctly even without -fipa-struct-reorg. Would you please try to compile it with all other options (-O3 -fdump-ipa-all -fwhole-program -combine

[Bug tree-optimization/34534] Multiple gcc.dg/struct/wo_prof_xxxx execution failures

2007-12-30 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #8 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-30 15:49 --- Created an attachment (id=14844) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14844action=view) Dump files without -fipa-struct-reorg -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34534

[Bug libstdc++/34626] New: Header constructors_destructor_fn_imps.hpp not found on AIX 5.3/IBM PPC

2007-12-30 Thread efernandez at physiomics-plc dot com
Hi, I have this problem when compiling gcc-4.2.2 under IBM AIX 5.3 with PowerPC CPUs (using 32-bit address mode): gmake[3]: Entering directory `/hpc/work/fernandz/gnuobj/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/libstdc++-v3' Making all in include gmake[4]: Entering directory

[Bug libstdc++/34626] Header constructors_destructor_fn_imps.hpp not found on AIX 5.3/IBM PPC

2007-12-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-30 18:48 --- What tar did you use to untar the sources? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34626

[Bug middle-end/34622] [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c fails at -O1 and above

2007-12-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-30 18:56 --- This worked with LAST_UPDATED: Sat Nov 10 21:21:01 UTC 2007 (revision 130075) . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34622

[Bug libstdc++/34626] Header constructors_destructor_fn_imps.hpp not found on AIX 5.3/IBM PPC

2007-12-30 Thread efernandez at physiomics-plc dot com
--- Comment #2 from efernandez at physiomics-plc dot com 2007-12-30 18:59 --- GNU tar (AIX-provided tar is not able to create the Longlink anyway): bash-2.05a$ /usr/local/gnu/bin/tar --version tar (GNU tar) 1.13 Copyright (C) 1988, 92,93,94,95,96,97,98, 1999 Free Software Foundation,