Re: [gcc-4.3-20080125] Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-openbsd4.2: missing sentinel in function call

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Andrew Pinski wrote: > 2008/1/27 Cauchy Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > $ uname -mrsp > > OpenBSD 4.2 i386 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz ("GenuineIntel" > > 686-class) > > > ../../gcc-4.3-20080125/gcc/read-rtl.c: In function 'join_c_conditions': > > ../../gcc-4.3-20080

Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-01-28)

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Status > == > > We are in Stage 3 and the trunk is open for regression and documentation > fixes only. When we reach zero open P1 regressions, we will create a > release candidate for 4.3.0, branch and announ

Help with GCC RTL and Register Allocator

Hello Everyone, I have a question regarding GCC RTL. I am currently modifying the OpenRISC backend to partition the register files. Here is an example of my add function: (define_insn "addsi3" [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=a,b,a,b") (plus:SI (match_operand:

gcc-4.1-20080128 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.1-20080128 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20080128/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: c++0x concepts in gcc call

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Doug Gregor wrote: > I was planning to kill the cxx0x-branch outright, because it has > nothing that isn't available on mainline (except a not-nearly-complete > delegating constructors implementation), and will not be used. If this > would be better handled by moving the entry

Re: Magic incantation for running multilib testsuite.

On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 00:17 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > when running with make -j, the testsuite is still run sequentially for > each pass; is there a way to run the passes in parallel? I always refer to this snippet in gcc/Makefile.in to remind myself: # The idea is to parallelize testing of

Re: Gcc stack alignment branch is created

On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:20:45PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > > > Index: svn.html > > === > > RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/svn.html,v > > retrieving revision 1.72 > > diff -u -p -r1.72 svn.html > > --- svn.html2

Re: Gcc stack alignment branch is created

"H.J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:47:23AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, H.J. Lu wrote: >> > I created gcc stack alignment branch to implement our proposal >> > to automatically align stack: >> > >> > svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/stack

Re: Gcc stack alignment branch is created

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, H.J. Lu wrote: > Does it look OK? I also updated my email address. Yes, thanks! In the first sentence you could say "...to automatically align the stack...", but that's only a minor detail. Gerald

GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-01-28)

Status == We are in Stage 3 and the trunk is open for regression and documentation fixes only. When we reach zero open P1 regressions, we will create a release candidate for 4.3.0, branch and announce the opening of Stage 1 for 4.4. Quality Data Significant progress has been m

Re: [libstdc++] testsuite failures on sparc biarch using -m64: tr1_impl/boost_shared_ptr.h error:

2008/1/26, Jonathan Wakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 22/01/2008, Christian Joensson wrote: > > 2008/1/21, Jonathan Wakely > > > My first guess would be that you've somehow got the C++0x and TR1 > > > versions of boost_sp_shared_count.h mixed up and you're including the > > > wrong one. > > > > well