Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
working on those FAIL?
I collected on gcc-testresults quite good Ada res
Joe Buck escreveu:
> There is no such thing as a "C++0x regression", since (very limited and
> experimental) C++0x support is brand new in 4.3, and 4.3.0 hasn't been
> released yet. A regression is something that worked correctly in a
> previously released version of GCC, but that doesn't work now
Laurent GUERBY writes:
> Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
>
> I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
> working on those FAIL?
>
> I collec
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
>
> I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
> working on those
PureMessage has detected a content threat in a mail sent by you.
Event: Threat
Action: Message quarantined
Message ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message subject:Re: Message Error
Recipient: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROT
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 09:23 -0500, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>
> > Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
> >
> > I see lots
Hi,
We operate a GCC release mirror in St. Louis, MO (mirrors.laffeycomputer.com).
This server has changed IP addresses, which is normally no worry on your end.
But the old IP had special access to the master server to be able to download
the releases right when they came out, and thus take s
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
working on those FAIL?
Uros looked at this for me and thinks it might be due to
I installed gcc4.3 20080215 on os x10.5.2 using macports
The configure arguments (with prefix = /opt/local) are:
47 configure.args --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++ \
48 --libdir=${prefix}/lib/${name} \
49 --includedir=${prefix}/include/${name} \
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Joe Laffey wrote:
> If you could enable the mirror access for the new IP I would appreciate
> it. Note that the old IP may be active for a little while as well. I am
> using it to get the latest release right now.
I've forwarded this to the group of admins for the gcc.gnu.or
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Joe Laffey wrote:
If you could enable the mirror access for the new IP I would appreciate
it. Note that the old IP may be active for a little while as well. I am
using it to get the latest release right now.
I've forwarded this t
11 matches
Mail list logo