Re: Official GCC git repository

I was only suggesting it as a nicity, if people are happy with the login name alone. What about "Real Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"? The overseers have the mapping, or you can sort of guess it from the names in the ChangeLog. This has to be decided before the first push, so it's kind of urgent

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 00:02 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Harvey Harrison > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is an artifact, it now creates them on the fly from the git repo > > rather than caching them. git-svn should delete all of the temp index > > fil

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is an artifact, it now creates them on the fly from the git repo > rather than caching them. git-svn should delete all of the temp index > files, if these are just leftovers from an old import, ok. Otherwise >

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:57 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > Lots of projects use the Name format, gcc adds that to the > > Changelog and the author is the login name, I was proposing to add > > the Name format to the git repo to make things like gitk > > nicer to use. > > There is no singula

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:57 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Harvey Harrison > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:04 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Harvey Harrison > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:04 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Harvey Harrison > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > >

Re: Official GCC git repository

> Lots of projects use the Name format, gcc adds that to the > Changelog and the author is the login name, I was proposing to add > the Name format to the git repo to make things like gitk > nicer to use. There is no singular mapping from login name to author, since we have all used differen

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:04 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Harvey Harrison > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > On

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 22:04 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Harvey Harrison > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > >

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > > On We

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > > >

RFH: testers for ieee test

I'm trying to write a test to check I get all the subnormal corner cases for ieee-754 double precision floating point division right. The usual thing to do with a new test is to try it on a known good platform. Unfortunately, the x86 processor of my workstation is actually known to get these calcu

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Hi

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 20:01 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > > > > > Guys, if you want, i can populate it with my git-svn clone, which has > > > a svn roo

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi - > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:42AM -0400, Frank C

Re: valgrind "uninitialized value" for __cxa_begin_catch? (Only if -static)

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:01:19PM -0400, Benjamin Redelings wrote: > Hi, > > I have noticed that, when I link my code statically, valgrind complains > about every exception that is caught. Hmm. Until recently valgrind didn't work on statically linked executables at all. But I did duplicate yo

gcc-4.2-20080326 is now available

Snapshot gcc-4.2-20080326 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20080326/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2

Richard Guenther wrote: How about we just drop the manual pages, then? Right now, we're in the situation where the manual is deceptive. If the manual talks about GPLv2, a user might rely on that. We should be making the license unambiguous so that users do not feel deceived. If we don't

Re: GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > >> In that message, you suggest that we need the local changes in order to > >> generate a gpl.7 manual page. But, why do we need such a manual page? > What > >> would be the adverse consequ

Re: GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2

Joseph S. Myers wrote: In that message, you suggest that we need the local changes in order to generate a gpl.7 manual page. But, why do we need such a manual page? What would be the adverse consequences of just replacing our gpl.texi with the FSF GPLv3 version? The manual page is needed to f

Re: GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, qunying wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have the impression that GCC 4.3.0 has updated to GPLv3. But > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.0/gcc/Copying.html still using > > > GPLv2. > > > Does i

Re: GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2

Joseph S. Myers wrote: On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, qunying wrote: Hi, I have the impression that GCC 4.3.0 has updated to GPLv3. But http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.0/gcc/Copying.html still using GPLv2. Does it need to be updated? I pointed out

Re: SSA Vs unSSA

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fran Baena wrote: > > > what are the advantages and inconvenients of get RTL from SSA rather > > than GIMPLE (previously translated from SSA)? > > It would mean that the expander would have to understand and unpick > SSA

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:38 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi - > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:42AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > > OK, /git/gcc.git appears ready for you to populate &

Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:25:05AM -0700, Till Straumann wrote: Is my inline assembly wrong or is this a gcc bug ? Your inline assembly seems wrong. I'm not yet convinced about that... /* Powerpc I/O barrier instruction */ #define EIEIO(pmem) do { asm volatile("eie

Re: Official GCC git repository

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi - > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:42AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > > [...] > > > OK, /git/gcc.git appears ready for you to populate & maintain. Access > > as {http,git,ssh}://gcc.gnu.org/gcc.git should a

Re: SSA Vs unSSA

Fran Baena wrote: > what are the advantages and inconvenients of get RTL from SSA rather > than GIMPLE (previously translated from SSA)? It would mean that the expander would have to understand and unpick SSA-specific stuff like PHI-nodes. It could be done, but I sure can't think of any reason

SSA Vs unSSA

Hi, what are the advantages and inconvenients of get RTL from SSA rather than GIMPLE (previously translated from SSA)? It has no implication in the next optimizations, isn't it? Thanks Fran

Re: Official GCC git repository

Hi - >>OK, /git/gcc.git appears ready for you to populate & maintain. Access >>as {http,git,ssh}://gcc.gnu.org/gcc.git should all work. Is there GIT Web support ? I believe a quoted line above already answers that question. But yes. :-) Ah, http://gcc.gnu.org/git/ works, great. Aaron

The Latest

As we record our next Album, go to http://www.splitbelly.com Grab our previous full length Album.. Absolutly FREE! Nothing to fill out, no strings attached! We also have a myspace page http://www.myspace.com/splitbelly You may have seen our site was down for a few days as we hooked up with a n

The Latest

As we record our next Album, go to http://www.splitbelly.com Grab our previous full length Album.. Absolutly FREE! Nothing to fill out, no strings attached! We also have a myspace page http://www.myspace.com/splitbelly You may have seen our site was down for a few days as we hooked up with a n

Re: Official GCC git repository

Hi - On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:42AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: [...] OK, /git/gcc.git appears ready for you to populate & maintain. Access as {http,git,ssh}://gcc.gnu.org/gcc.git should all work. Just a reminder - an empty git repository has been ready for you for some time. Is th

Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code

Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:25:05AM -0700, Till Straumann wrote: >> Is my inline assembly wrong or is this a gcc bug ? > > Your inline assembly seems wrong. I don't think so. >> /* Powerpc I/O barrier instruction */ >> #define EIEIO(pmem) do { asm v

Re: parallel bootstrap failure: options.h

> "Janis" == Janis Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Janis> Parallel bootstrap on powerpc64-linux currently fails with: Janis> In file included Janis> from /home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/gcc/genconditions.c:32: Janis> ./tm.h:7:22: error: options.h: No such file or directory Another one o

parallel bootstrap failure: options.h

Parallel bootstrap on powerpc64-linux currently fails with: In file included from /home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/gcc/genconditions.c:32: ./tm.h:7:22: error: options.h: No such file or directory echo '[c]' >> tmp-gi.list echo '/home/janis/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/gcc/c-lang.c' >> tmp-gi.list echo '

Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:25:05AM -0700, Till Straumann wrote: > Is my inline assembly wrong or is this a gcc bug ? Your inline assembly seems wrong. > /* Powerpc I/O barrier instruction */ > #define EIEIO(pmem) do { asm volatile("eieio":"=m"(*pmem):"m"(*pmem)); } > while (0) An output memory

Re: Official GCC git repository

Hi - On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:42AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > [...] > OK, /git/gcc.git appears ready for you to populate & maintain. Access > as {http,git,ssh}://gcc.gnu.org/gcc.git should all work. Just a reminder - an empty git repository has been ready for you for some time. - FC

gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code

As of gcc-4.3.0 one of my drivers stopped working. I distilled the code down to a few lines (see below). The output of gcc-4.3.0 -S -O2 -c tst.c and gcc-4.2.3 -S -O2 -c tst.c is attached. The code generated by gcc-4.2.3 is as expected. However, gcc-4.3.0 does not produce a correct resul