[Bug other/35454] [4.3/4.4 Regression] m68k: internal compiler error: in find_reloads, at reload.c:3744

2008-03-30 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #2 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-03-30 22:44 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 32424 *** -- schwab at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/32423] gcc.c-torture/compile/20020604-1.c ICEs

2008-03-30 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-03-30 22:49 --- No longer reproducible on the trunk. -- schwab at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Known to

[Bug c++/35245] FAIL: g++.dg/other/anon5.C

2008-03-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-30 23:21 --- Subject: Bug 35245 Author: danglin Date: Sun Mar 30 23:20:57 2008 New Revision: 133739 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=133739 Log: PR c++/35245 * g++.dg/other/anon5.C: Skip on

[Bug c++/35245] FAIL: g++.dg/other/anon5.C

2008-03-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-30 23:24 --- Subject: Bug 35245 Author: danglin Date: Sun Mar 30 23:23:43 2008 New Revision: 133740 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=133740 Log: PR c++/35245 * g++.dg/other/anon5.C: Skip on

[Bug c++/35245] FAIL: g++.dg/other/anon5.C

2008-03-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-30 23:30 --- Fixed. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/35626] gcc for CELL spu produces poor code using functions with structure parameters

2008-03-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-30 23:31 --- This is now fixed: add_tri: fa $3,$3,$6 stqd$sp,-224($sp) fa $4,$4,$7 fa $5,$5,$8 ai $sp,$sp,-224 lnop ai $sp,$sp,224 bi

[Bug middle-end/35771] Call expander ignores type alignment

2008-03-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-30 23:58 --- The problem is __m128 shoulbn't the canonical type for unaligned. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35771

[Bug middle-end/35768] gcc.c-torture/compile/20010226-1.c:22: ICE: in do_output_reload, at reload1.c:7331

2008-03-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-30 23:58 --- (gdb) p debug_rtx (rl-out) (scratch) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35768

[Bug middle-end/35768] gcc.c-torture/compile/20010226-1.c:22: ICE: in do_output_reload, at reload1.c:7331

2008-03-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-31 00:03 --- Richard, does match_scratch now require a mode? The pattern causing the problem was written without a mode so that it could handle both SImode and DImode. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug c++/35758] [4.3/4.4 Regression] vector_size attribute lost in function arguments for templates

2008-03-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-31 00:16 --- So what is happening is we are not applying the attribute while doing overload resolution so we reject the template function then. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35758

[Bug c++/35758] [4.3/4.4 Regression] vector_size attribute lost in function arguments for templates

2008-03-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-31 00:18 --- That being said, I think fn_type_unification should apply the attributes but I don't know/understand the template part of the C++ front-end. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35758

[Bug middle-end/35771] Call expander ignores type alignment

2008-03-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-31 02:04 --- useless_type_conversion_p returns true for (gdb) call debug_tree (outer_type) vector_type 0x2ac11240 unaligned type real_type 0x2ab0a6c0 float asm_written SF size integer_cst 0x2aaeba80

[Bug target/35767] x86 backend uses aligned load on unaligned memory

2008-03-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-31 04:46 --- *** Bug 35771 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35767

[Bug middle-end/35771] Call expander ignores type alignment

2008-03-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-31 04:46 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35767 *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/35767] x86 backend uses aligned load on unaligned memory

2008-03-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-31 04:48 --- Middle end use canonical type for passing parameters to function calls. ix86_function_arg_boundary should do the same. Otherwise, there will be a mismatch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35767

<    1   2