Luke Dalessandro wrote:
I'm making some modifications to exception handling inside of
unwind-dw2-fde.c that I'd like to use __sync_bool_compare_and_swap
for, unfortunately I can't seem to figure out how to correctly use
builtins in the context of libgcc.
I've tried a bunch of different things
On Jun 9, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Chris,
Are there any specific plans for moving llvm-gcc from the
gcc 4.2 to the gcc 4.3 code base?
I don't know of any specific plans for this, though several people
have expressed interest. What we need is someone to step forward and
do
Hello,
I noticed I miss few important things in the first email regarding
mirror.
Mirror name: gcc.releasenotes.org
Mirror url: http://gcc.releasenotes.org
Location: USA, TX
Supporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope all fine now.
Thnaks.
Alex Korolev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Le-Chun Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Please let me know if you have any feedback/comments/questions on the
> proposed annotations and the GCC implementation.
I was surprised that there was no consideration of C indirect function
calls in your design document. e.g. I would have expect some
I'm making some modifications to exception handling inside of unwind-dw2-fde.c
that I'd like to use __sync_bool_compare_and_swap for, unfortunately I can't
seem to figure out how to correctly use builtins in the context of libgcc.
I've tried a bunch of different things, but I consistently get t
From: "Ian Lance Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Joern Rennecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have been using note_stores to modify selected assignments. Now when I
try to move this code to gcc 4.4, I find that I get a warning because
my walker function takes a non-const rtx - and if I make it ta
Hi,
We have been working on creating program annotations for C/C++ (in GCC
attributes) to help developers document locks and how they need to be
used to safely read and write shared variables in multi-threaded code.
We've also implemented a new GCC pass that uses the annotations to
identify and wa
Joern Rennecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have been using note_stores to modify selected assignments. Now when I
> try to move this code to gcc 4.4, I find that I get a warning because
> my walker function takes a non-const rtx - and if I make it take a const rtx,
> there will be a warning s
I have been using note_stores to modify selected assignments. Now when I
try to move this code to gcc 4.4, I find that I get a warning because
my walker function takes a non-const rtx - and if I make it take a const rtx,
there will be a warning somewhere inside because there is a code path
where a
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20080609 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20080609/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Hi Tobi,
Thanks for working on this.
Solution 2 is the right one.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Tobias Grosser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. It is not very efficient. As we have many multiplications in the
> code.
> Will later gcc optimization passes convert these multiplications to
> addit
Hi Sebastian, Hi Cedric,
since Thursday I think about how to implement loop tiling in graphite.
Lets start with a simple example:
for (i=0;i<=10;i++) {
for (j=0;j<=20;j++) {
S1 ;
}
}
# eq/in i j n 1
1 1 0 0 0 # i >= 0
1 -1 0 0 10 # i <= 10
1 0 1 0 0 # j
>Are there any specific plans for moving llvm-gcc from the
> gcc 4.2 to the gcc 4.3 code base?
I plan to port llvm-gcc to gcc head, since I'm interested in the
Ada front-end and the Ada support in gcc-4.4 is much better than
in gcc-4.2. However I can't say when this will happen, since I
don't
Chris,
Are there any specific plans for moving llvm-gcc from the
gcc 4.2 to the gcc 4.3 code base?
Jack
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 09:09:29AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For anyone who is interested, we just released LLVM 2.3:
>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.ed
Hi all,
For anyone who is interested, we just released LLVM 2.3:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-announce/2008-June/27.html
http://llvm.org/releases/2.3/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
It has many improvements over the 2.2 release from February, including
better support for gfortran and Ad
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 06:50:26AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:28:34AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ymm0 and xmm0 are the same register. xmm0 is the lower 128bit
> > > > of xmm0. I am not sure if we need separate XMM registers from
> > > > YMM registers.
> >
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/9 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is there any reason why "gcc -Wall" doesn't emit warnings by default
>>> on some useless
2008/6/9 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there any reason why "gcc -Wall" doesn't emit warnings by default
>> on some useless extensions such as pointer arithmetic on (void *)?
>
> Use -pedantic to warn about e
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any reason why "gcc -Wall" doesn't emit warnings by default
> on some useless extensions such as pointer arithmetic on (void *)?
Use -pedantic to warn about extensions. It doesn't make sense to
warn for extensio
Is there any reason why "gcc -Wall" doesn't emit warnings by default
on some useless extensions such as pointer arithmetic on (void *)?
IMHO, such an extension is useless because there's an easy workaround:
use casts to char *. And since g++ barfs on pointer arithmetic on
void *, such a warning wo
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 06:49:39PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> This brings in everything from trunk just before the new OMP3 changes.
> Jakub, you can do the omp3 merge now. David, this converts
> tree-call-cdce.c to use tuples. The only change is the removal of the
> flag that I mentioned ear
Dear GCC-Developers,
my name is Martin Schindewolf and I am a student about to start his
PhD. Currently, my funding comes from HiPEAC, a European Network that
has been encouraging and funding GCC related projects in the past.
Please have a look at the home page for details about HiPEAC[1] a
Hi David/SC,
Thanks again for accepting the picochip port in GCC.
Although the picochip port has been accepted by the Steering Committee,
we have had trouble getting a GWP maintainer to review the port. All the
GWP maintainers seem to be extremely busy. I have emailed all of them,
but haven't
GCC 4.3.1 has been released.
GCC 4.3.1 is a bug-fix release, containing fixes for regressions in GCC
4.3.0 relative to previous GCC releases.
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html
and particularly
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html#4.3.1
for more information about changes in G
24 matches
Mail list logo
