I think the necessity and urgency of IRA_COVER_CLASSES, calls
for a few more details to be documented.
tm.texi says for it:
Cover classes are a set of non-intersecting register
classes covering all hard registers used for register allocation
purposes.
Ok, so I can construct a set from reg_class a
With a clean trunk and building in a different directoty, I end up
at
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/kargl/gcc/obj/zlib'
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/home/kargl/gcc/obj/libcpp'
gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/kargl/gcc/obj/libcpp'
gmake[
Is anyone else seeing the following build failure on i686 Darwin9?
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag CXX --mode=compile
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20080829/darwin_objdir/./gcc/xgcc
-shared-libgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20080829/darwin_objdir/./gcc
-nostdinc++
-L/sw/src/fink.build
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20080829 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20080829/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Tim München
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is it somehow possible to also be notified if a function/method is left with
> a 'throw'? Or, would it be possible to patch gcc like that? I had a quick
> look into function.c but it seems not to be as straight-forward as the
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:31:24PM +0530, Aaron P. D'Souza wrote:
> hello:
>
> one small question regarding use of ARM inline assembly code in a
> C file that has been compiled for Thumb mode.
>
> is it possible to use ARM assembly code from within a C file that
> has been compiled for Thumb and Th
shafi wrote:
>Operand 0 is a register
>Operand 1 is a memory
>Operand 2 is a register
>
>
>> The md description for this instruction is:
>>
>> ;; addhi3
>> (define_expand "addhi3"
>> [(set (match_operand:HI 0 "register_operand" "")
>> (plus:HI (match_operand:HI 1 "coo
sss
what is GCC?
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 8:29 AM
Subject: GCC 4.3.2 Released
GCC 4.3.2 has been released.
GCC 4.3.2 is a bug-fix release, containing fixes for regressions in GCC
> > On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > tonight testing on x86_64, i386 and IA-64 didn't seem to bring any new
> > > surprises, so I've comitted the following patch.
> > > I will also update changes page of 4.4.
> > >
> > > * doc/invoke.texi (-fipa-cp): Enabled by defaul
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > tonight testing on x86_64, i386 and IA-64 didn't seem to bring any new
> > surprises, so I've comitted the following patch.
> > I will also update changes page of 4.4.
> >
> > * doc/invoke.texi (-fipa-cp): Enabled by default at -O2/-Os/-
GCC 4.3.2 has been released.
GCC 4.3.2 is a bug-fix release, containing fixes for regressions in GCC
4.3.1 relative to previous GCC releases. This release is available from
the FTP servers listed at:
http://www.gnu.org/order/ftp.html
Please do not contact me directly regarding questions or
ace/rguenther/obj/./prev-gcc/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -c -g -O2 -gnatpg -gnata
-nostdinc -I- -I. -Iada -I../../trunk/gcc/ada
-I../../trunk/gcc/ada/gcc-interface ../../trunk/gcc/ada/sem_ch12.adb -o
ada/sem_ch12.o
+===GNAT BUG
DETECTED===
>Hi All,
> I am getting the error message bellow while hacking my gcc backend.
>Any suggestions on how to fix this?
>
>error: insn does not satisfy its constraints:
>(insn 25 50 26 2 (set (reg:HI 1 %r0 [33])
> (plus:HI (mem/s/j:HI (plus:HI (reg:HI 3 %r2)
> (reg/v/f:HI
Hi,
tonight testing on x86_64, i386 and IA-64 didn't seem to bring any new
surprises, so I've comitted the following patch.
I will also update changes page of 4.4.
* doc/invoke.texi (-fipa-cp): Enabled by default at -O2/-Os/-O3
(-fipa-cp-clone): Enabled by default at -O3.
*
Hi,
is it somehow possible to also be notified if a function/method is left with
a 'throw'? Or, would it be possible to patch gcc like that? I had a quick
look into function.c but it seems not to be as straight-forward as the
entry/exit instrumentation (What is probably the reason it isn't imp
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 16:02 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I get the following errors when running the GNAT testsuite on
> > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with make check -j2
> > --target_board=\{-
16 matches
Mail list logo