÷ÚÒÏÓÌÁÑ ÏÂÎÁÖÅÎÎÁÑ ÂÒÀÎÅÔËÁ

2008-11-24 Thread gannon nobuko
îÅÖÎÙÊ ÑÚÙÞÏË ÌÁÓËÁÅÔ ËÉÓËÕ http://www.calculi15093.chat.ru

Re: __Unwind_GetIPInfo on Darwin 8.11

2008-11-24 Thread IainS
Hello Jack, On 21 Nov 2008, at 18:35, Jack Howarth wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 03:57:15PM +, IainS wrote: When 'make checking', I conventionally move the built libgcc_s. 1.dylib and libgcc_s.10.4.dylib to one side prior to testing (so that the Apple-supplied system version is used).

Re: [4.2] MIPS: missed optimization

2008-11-24 Thread Manuel Lauss
Hello Richard, On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 05:14:27PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote: Richard Sandiford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Manuel Lauss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Admittedly my understanding of mips assembly is not yet very advanced, am I missing something or is this a bug? Well,

Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management

2008-11-24 Thread Joel Porquet
2008/11/21 Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No, there's nothing wrong with this. You can even use multiple models in the same executable for the same symbol. The linker will take care of everything necessary. For instance, the executable's TLS block is at a fixed offset from the DTV

Re: [RFC] Remove -frtl-abstract-sequences in 4.5

2008-11-24 Thread Mark Mitchell
David Edelsohn wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Diego Novillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This option has been problematic and does not seem to be well maintained. In terms of usefulness, it would also be worth implementing as a gimple pass, ideally in IPA mode. I propose that we remove

Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]

2008-11-24 Thread Mark Mitchell
Paul Brook wrote: foo (argv[0]); I'd say it's a broken test then. It's a broken program, in full generality. DJ, you could fix this either by checking argc != 0 in the test, or by adding an effective-target condition that the test be run only on targets that pass argv[0]. I think

Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]

2008-11-24 Thread Andreas Schwab
Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, I think an even better fix is just to hard-code the string and make it volatile. Presumably, the use of argv[0] here is just to keep the compiler from optimizing the program away. So, I suggest doing something like: volatile char *x =

Re: [RFC] Remove -frtl-abstract-sequences in 4.5

2008-11-24 Thread Diego Novillo
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:23, Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Edelsohn wrote: It currently is broken on many platforms. Why not remove it now? What is the purpose of keeping a pass that does not work correctly and developers cannot use? I agree with David. Works for me too.

Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]

2008-11-24 Thread Mark Mitchell
Andreas Schwab wrote: Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, I think an even better fix is just to hard-code the string and make it volatile. Presumably, the use of argv[0] here is just to keep the compiler from optimizing the program away. So, I suggest doing something like:

Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]

2008-11-24 Thread Andreas Schwab
Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andreas Schwab wrote: Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, I think an even better fix is just to hard-code the string and make it volatile. Presumably, the use of argv[0] here is just to keep the compiler from optimizing the program

Re: Fwd: Mips, -fpie and TLS management

2008-11-24 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 03:27:55PM +0100, Joel Porquet wrote: And the related reloc symbols are: 5ffe14b0 0026 R_MIPS_TLS_DTPMOD 5ffe14b8 0026 R_MIPS_TLS_DTPMOD Still, is R_MIPS_TLS_DTPMOD a correct symbol ? In the document you wrote about NPTL for mips

Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]

2008-11-24 Thread DJ Delorie
How about this? --- gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr36321.c 2008-07-23 00:21:31.0 -0400 +++ ./pr36321.c 2008-11-24 13:46:04.0 -0500 @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ } +static char * volatile argp = pr36321.x; + int main(int argc, char **argv) { - foo (argv[0]); + foo

Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]

2008-11-24 Thread Mark Mitchell
DJ Delorie wrote: How about this? OK. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713

Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]

2008-11-24 Thread DJ Delorie
OK. Thanks, committed.

Re: [4.2] MIPS: missed optimization

2008-11-24 Thread Richard Sandiford
Manuel Lauss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 05:14:27PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote: Richard Sandiford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Manuel Lauss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Admittedly my understanding of mips assembly is not yet very advanced, am I missing something or

Re: Problem with x64 SEH macro implementation for ReactOS

2008-11-24 Thread Richard Henderson
Timo Kreuzer wrote: I am working on x64 SEH for ReactOS. The idea is to use .cfi_escape codes to mark the code positions where the try block starts / ends and of the except landing pad. The emitted .eh_frame section is parsed after linking and converted into Windows compatible unwind info /

[Bug rtl-optimization/38245] [4.4 Regression] apparent improper segfault in compiler output

2008-11-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 09:01 --- Smaller testcase: static inline int f1 (int si1, int si2) { return si2 == 0 ? si1 : si1 / si2; } static inline unsigned long long f2 (unsigned long long ui1, unsigned long long ui2) { return ui1 % ui2; }

[Bug c/38243] Restrict constraint violation not an error with -pedantic-errors

2008-11-24 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-11-24 09:06 --- *** Bug 38246 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38243

[Bug c/38246] Restrict constraint violation not an error with -pedantic-errors

2008-11-24 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-11-24 09:06 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38243 *** -- schwab at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/38245] [4.4 Regression] apparent improper segfault in compiler output

2008-11-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug c++/38242] Overeager ADL searches associated namespaces of base class's template arguments

2008-11-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 10:07 --- Y is also not a template-id (?) Confirmed. EDG rejects this. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/38244] bitset initialization from 0 rejected.

2008-11-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 10:08 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/38054] Assertion failed in change_decl_assembler_name()

2008-11-24 Thread hackbunny at reactos dot com
--- Comment #7 from hackbunny at reactos dot com 2008-11-24 10:24 --- Created an attachment (id=16756) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16756action=view) Smaller test case gcc -c -v -funit-at-a-time -nostdinc testcase.c Using built-in specs. Target: mingw32

[Bug libstdc++/38244] bitset initialization from 0 rejected.

2008-11-24 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-24 10:21 --- This is essentially a defect in DR 778: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#778 I'll see what we can do for now. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

[Bug target/38054] Assertion failed in change_decl_assembler_name()

2008-11-24 Thread hackbunny at reactos dot com
--- Comment #8 from hackbunny at reactos dot com 2008-11-24 10:29 --- I have added a test case that shows a closely related issue with nested functions, -funit-at-a-time and unreferenced file-scope externs (yes, if you remove int x = 0; the warning goes away) The %D renamed after being

[Bug libstdc++/38244] [4.4 Regression] bitset initialization from 0 rejected.

2008-11-24 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
-- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|bitset initialization from 0|[4.4 Regression] bitset |rejected.

[Bug libstdc++/38233] [4.4 Regression] 'map' value type + new uninitted const member warnings causes error

2008-11-24 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-24 11:10 --- The default constructor of pair just implements DR 265, this is *very* old: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#265 This is possibly a C++ front-end issue, because lately nothing

[Bug libstdc++/38244] [4.4 Regression] bitset initialization from 0 rejected.

2008-11-24 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 11:14 --- Subject: Bug 38244 Author: paolo Date: Mon Nov 24 11:13:44 2008 New Revision: 142152 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142152 Log: 2008-11-24 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libstdc++/38244] [4.4 Regression] bitset initialization from 0 rejected.

2008-11-24 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-24 11:15 --- Fixed. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/38244] [4.4 Regression] bitset initialization from 0 rejected.

2008-11-24 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 11:21 --- Subject: Bug 38244 Author: paolo Date: Mon Nov 24 11:19:39 2008 New Revision: 142153 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142153 Log: 2008-11-24 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/35681] wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS

2008-11-24 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 12:15 --- Subject: Bug 35681 Author: mikael Date: Mon Nov 24 12:13:59 2008 New Revision: 142154 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142154 Log: 2008-11-24 Mikael Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/35681] wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS

2008-11-24 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 12:25 --- Argh!! elemental_dependency_1.f90 was not committed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35681

[Bug fortran/35681] wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS

2008-11-24 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 12:38 --- Subject: Bug 35681 Author: mikael Date: Mon Nov 24 12:37:25 2008 New Revision: 142155 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142155 Log: 2008-11-24 Mikael Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/35681] wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS

2008-11-24 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #24 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 12:48 --- Subject: Bug 35681 Author: mikael Date: Mon Nov 24 12:46:57 2008 New Revision: 142156 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142156 Log: 2008-11-24 Mikael Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/37135] [4.3/4.4 Regression] code size increase for bit-fields assignment

2008-11-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 12:59 --- Subject: Bug 37135 Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 24 12:57:37 2008 New Revision: 142157 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142157 Log: PR middle-end/37135 * dse.c

[Bug fortran/35681] wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS

2008-11-24 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #25 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 13:10 --- (In reply to comment #22) Argh!! elemental_dependency_1.f90 was not committed. Fixed now, sorry for the noise. (In reply to comment #20) Mikael, Daniel: Have I missed something or is everything in this PR

[Bug fortran/37779] Missing RECURSIVE not detected

2008-11-24 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 13:12 --- Subject: Bug 37779 Author: domob Date: Mon Nov 24 13:10:37 2008 New Revision: 142158 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142158 Log: 2008-11-24 Daniel Kraft [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/38247] New: problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
I am using the following gfortran compiler, installed on a 32-bit computer running Open SUSE 10.0: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/design/linux/gfortran/bug32_1/test gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.4.0 20081021 (experimental) [trunk revision 141258] Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 14:37 --- Created an attachment (id=16757) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16757action=view) archive described in the initial bug report Pleas see initial bug report. --

[Bug libstdc++/35569] [c++0x] std::bind result functor doesn't accept rvalues

2008-11-24 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-24 14:55 --- *** Bug 38238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/38238] std::tr1::bind fails to compile with pointer to member function

2008-11-24 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-24 14:55 --- The problem is the rvalue (2) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35569 *** -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/38177] Internal compiler error during gcc build with -march=amdfam10

2008-11-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-11-24 15:05 --- The sbitmap.i works for me with ~/gcc-build-43/gcc/cc1 -O2 -march=amdfam10 -mcx16 -msahf -fprofile-generate --param l1-cache-size=64 --param l1-cache-line-size=64 where GNU C (GCC) version 4.3.3 20081110 (prerelease)

[Bug fortran/38248] New: Fatal Error: Reading module mmm: Expected left parenthesis

2008-11-24 Thread jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com
Minimal testcase to `use' some module cannot be compiled. Compilation works fine on Fedora gcc-gfortran-4.3.2-7.x86_64. GNU Fortran (GCC) version 4.4.0 20081124 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C version 4.4.0 20081124 (experimental), GMP version 4.2.2, MPFR

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 15:19 --- Your shell script contains items of the form /home/norm/design/numrec/nrTypeM.f90 which of course doesn't exist so the shell script aborts when executed. BTW, if it is fixed on amd64, then it is mostlikely fixed

[Bug target/38177] Internal compiler error during gcc build with -march=amdfam10

2008-11-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-11-24 15:29 --- BTW: You should report this bug to: with-bugurl=http://bugs.gentoo.org/ -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 15:29 --- (In reply to comment #2) This is probably too old: GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.4.0 20081021 (experimental) [trunk revision 141258] Definitely, the bug is PR37445, which was fixed on 3rd November. --

[Bug target/38177] Internal compiler error during gcc build with -march=amdfam10

2008-11-24 Thread special at dereferenced dot net
--- Comment #6 from special at dereferenced dot net 2008-11-24 15:36 --- I've already spoken to one of the GCC maintainers for gentoo - he advised me to report the issue directly upstream if I could reproduce it without gentoo-specific patches (which I have); this could be an issue

[Bug fortran/38248] Fatal Error: Reading module mmm: Expected left parenthesis

2008-11-24 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 15:37 --- Works for me. $ /usr/local/bin/gfortran -v Utilisation des specs internes. Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configuré avec: ../src/configure --enable-languages=fortran --enable-maintainer-mode --disable-multilib :

[Bug target/38177] Internal compiler error during gcc build with -march=amdfam10

2008-11-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-11-24 16:00 --- (In reply to comment #6) I've already spoken to one of the GCC maintainers for gentoo - he advised me to report the issue directly upstream if I could reproduce it without gentoo-specific patches (which I have); this

[Bug c/38243] Restrict constraint violation not an error with -pedantic-errors

2008-11-24 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||16989 nThis||

[Bug fortran/38248] Fatal Error: Reading module mmm: Expected left parenthesis

2008-11-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 16:20 --- The error message looks as if you are mixing a gfortran 4.3 compiled .mod file with a gfortran 4.4 compiler (or vice versa). While the gfortran 4.3 compiled *.o/*.so/*.a files are supposed to be compatible with 4.4's

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 16:22 --- To add: There is currently a build problem for the linux 32bit version of the gfortran nightlies; thus there has been no newer build since about one month. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug fortran/38249] New: read(*,*) seems to have broken

2008-11-24 Thread ronis at ronispc dot chem dot mcgill dot ca
I have some legacy code that I just tried compiling with gfortan (on a i686-linux-slackware-12.1 box). There were a large number of warnings of the type: Warning: Nonconforming tab character in column 1 of line 69 (These where lines which started with a single tab instead of 7 spaces). In

[Bug middle-end/38250] New: ICE with -O2 -ftree-loop-distribution

2008-11-24 Thread tomby at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC ICEs on folowing code with options -O2 -ftree-loop-distribution typedef long unsigned int size_t; typedef struct { long dat[2]; } gsl_complex_long_double; typedef struct { size_t size; size_t stride; long *data; } gsl_vector_complex_long_double; void

[Bug middle-end/38250] ICE with -O2 -ftree-loop-distribution

2008-11-24 Thread tomby at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tomby at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 16:31 --- Created an attachment (id=16758) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16758action=view) gcc ICEs on this file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38250

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 15:32 --- After removing all of your full path names, I get REMOVE:kargl[215] gfc4x WinModI.f90 -c -Wall -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -std=f2003 -fno-backslash -owinmod.o winmod.xyz WinModI.f90:68: Error: Can't open

[Bug fortran/38248] Ignored temporary module files manipulation errors

2008-11-24 Thread jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com
-- jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal Summary|Fatal Error: Reading module |Ignored

[Bug middle-end/38250] ICE with -O2 -ftree-loop-distribution

2008-11-24 Thread tomby at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tomby at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 16:39 --- In tree-loop-distribution.c (generate_memset_zero) can be DR_STEP(dr) NULL. But it is passed into fold_build2 that expect two non null expressions. If program flow goes to end: due to goto then temporary variables

[Bug fortran/38248] Ignored temporary module files manipulation errors

2008-11-24 Thread jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com 2008-11-24 16:40 --- Created an attachment (id=16759) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16759action=view) Check the file manipulations errors. Thanks Tobias B., unlink(mmm.mod) = -1 EPERM

[Bug middle-end/38250] ICE with -O2 -ftree-loop-distribution

2008-11-24 Thread tomby at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tomby at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 16:42 --- Created an attachment (id=16760) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16760action=view) This patch fixes problems -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38250

[Bug target/36793] x86-64 does not get __sync_synchronize right

2008-11-24 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 16:57 --- Subject: Bug 36793 Author: uros Date: Mon Nov 24 16:55:49 2008 New Revision: 142160 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142160 Log: * config/i386/i386.md (UNSPECV_CMPXCHG): Rename from

[Bug target/36793] x86-64 does not get __sync_synchronize right

2008-11-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-11-24 16:59 --- Fixed. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/38249] read(*,*) seems to have broken

2008-11-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 17:00 --- (In reply to comment #0) I have some legacy code that I just tried compiling with gfortan (on a i686-linux-slackware-12.1 box). There were a large number of warnings of the type: Warning: Nonconforming tab

Re: [Bug middle-end/38250] ICE with -O2 -ftree-loop-distribution

2008-11-24 Thread Sebastian Pop
The patch looks good. Please test and ask for approval to commit to trunk on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Sebastian

[Bug middle-end/38250] ICE with -O2 -ftree-loop-distribution

2008-11-24 Thread sebpop at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2008-11-24 17:27 --- Subject: Re: ICE with -O2 -ftree-loop-distribution The patch looks good. Please test and ask for approval to commit to trunk on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Sebastian --

[Bug fortran/38249] read(*,*) seems to have broken

2008-11-24 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 17:07 --- Regarding TAB: Standard Fortran does not allow tabs, as extension gfortran does. Thus you do not need to change the code (though it does not harm to be standard compliant - that is what the warning tells you). But

[Bug middle-end/38167] Accessor to stdin breaks on -O2 optimization

2008-11-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 17:46 --- This is most likely one of the aliasing bugs. Does -fno-strict-aliasing fix the issue? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/38251] New: [4.4 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines

2008-11-24 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
As of trunk revision 142086, libgcj doesn't build any longer on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B: (cd classes; \ jar cf ../tools.zip `find . -name .svn -prune -o -type f -print`; \ cd ..) /usr/local/bin/bash: /vol/gnu/bin/jar: Arg list too long I think such systems still need to be taken into

[Bug libgcj/38251] [4.4 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines

2008-11-24 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 17:56 --- Please try jar cf ../tools.zip `find . -name .svn -prune -o -type d -print` -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38251

[Bug target/35018] [m68k-elf] Gcc ouputs invalid asm when compiling with -O2 or higher

2008-11-24 Thread mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 17:56 --- Subject: Bug 35018 Author: mkuvyrkov Date: Mon Nov 24 17:55:35 2008 New Revision: 142161 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142161 Log: PR target/35018 * config/m68k/m68k.md

[Bug fortran/38252] New: Empty function with CONTAINS triggers Internal Error

2008-11-24 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
This program gives an Internal Error pointing at the CONTAINS: INTEGER FUNCTION test () CONTAINS END FUNCTION test It works with gfortran 4.3.1. Replacing the FUNCTION by a SUBROUTINE gets rid of the error. Additionally, this program also works: FUNCTION test () INTEGER :: test CONTAINS END

[Bug libgcj/38251] [4.4 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines

2008-11-24 Thread ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
--- Comment #2 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-11-24 18:04 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines aph at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: Please try jar cf ../tools.zip `find . -name .svn -prune -o -type d

[Bug c++/38076] FAIL: g++.dg/other/anon5.C

2008-11-24 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 18:07 --- Subject: Bug 38076 Author: janis Date: Mon Nov 24 18:05:50 2008 New Revision: 142163 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142163 Log: 2008-11-24 Jack Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug testsuite/38241] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/const2.C fails on *-apple-darwin9

2008-11-24 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 18:12 --- Subject: Bug 38241 Author: janis Date: Mon Nov 24 18:11:12 2008 New Revision: 142164 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142164 Log: 2008-11-24 Jack Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/38167] Accessor to stdin breaks on -O2 optimization

2008-11-24 Thread aleksi dot nurmi at helsinki dot fi
--- Comment #7 from aleksi dot nurmi at helsinki dot fi 2008-11-24 18:17 --- (In reply to comment #6) This is most likely one of the aliasing bugs. Does -fno-strict-aliasing fix the issue? Nope. I did a little research and it seems that -fno-tree-vrp fixes it. --

[Bug libgcj/38251] [4.4 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines

2008-11-24 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 18:29 --- Yes, of course. jar has an update mode that adds files, so I can use that. How long may an arglist be? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38251

[Bug middle-end/36359] missed optimization in some cases with PRE VRP and other passes combined together

2008-11-24 Thread edwintorok at gmail dot com
--- Comment #17 from edwintorok at gmail dot com 2008-11-24 18:33 --- Created an attachment (id=16761) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16761action=view) drivers/scsi/sd.c Similar problem with drivers/scsi/sd.c I can compile the attached preprocessed on x86_64 linux:

[Bug libgcj/38251] [4.4 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines

2008-11-24 Thread ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
--- Comment #4 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2008-11-24 18:37 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines aph at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: jar has an update mode that adds files, so I can use that. How long may an

[Bug libgcj/38251] [4.4 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines

2008-11-24 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 18:48 --- Sure, if you can use zip instead, do that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38251

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #6 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 18:50 --- Created an attachment (id=16762) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16762action=view) updated, and corrected (I hope) archive hello, Sorry for the mixup on the archive. I've attached a new one,

[Bug c++/38253] New: g++.dg/ipa/iinline-1.C scan-ipa-dump inline fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2008-11-24 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
The test case for g++.dg/ipa/iinline-1.C scan-ipa-dump inline fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 as follows in current gcc trunk... Executing on host: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20081120/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++

[Bug c++/38253] g++.dg/ipa/iinline-1.C scan-ipa-dump inline fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9

2008-11-24 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-24 18:52 --- Created an attachment (id=16763) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16763action=view) assembly file for g++.dg/ipa/iinline-1.C on powerpc-apple-darwin9 --

[Bug libgcj/38251] [4.4 Regression] tools.zip doesn't build on systems with short command lines

2008-11-24 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 18:52 --- I suggest jar cf ... to create it, and zip u ... to add to it that way you'll get the correct META-INF directory. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38251

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #7 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 18:54 --- Subject: Re: problem with contained subprocedure. Hello, This appears to be the problem. In any case, I just submitted a new archive file. I hope this one's correct. Thanks for your help. Let me know when the fix has

[Bug fortran/38184] invariant RESHAPE not expanded if SOURCE is empty

2008-11-24 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 19:06 --- Subject: Bug 38184 Author: mikael Date: Mon Nov 24 19:04:34 2008 New Revision: 142168 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142168 Log: 2008-11-24 Mikael Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/38249] read(*,*) seems to have broken

2008-11-24 Thread ronis at ronispc dot chem dot mcgill dot ca
--- Comment #3 from ronis at ronispc dot chem dot mcgill dot ca 2008-11-24 19:07 --- OK, here's the information you requested: gfortran -v: Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc/configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --with-gnu-as --enable-shared --with-gnu-ld

[Bug fortran/38249] read(*,*) seems to have broken

2008-11-24 Thread ronis at ronispc dot chem dot mcgill dot ca
--- Comment #4 from ronis at ronispc dot chem dot mcgill dot ca 2008-11-24 19:08 --- Created an attachment (id=16764) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16764action=view) sample source and makefile Running make or make DEBUG=x will generate the program. When you run

[Bug fortran/35681] wrong result for vector subscripted array expression in MVBITS

2008-11-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #26 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 19:14 --- Subject: Bug 35681 Author: pault Date: Mon Nov 24 19:13:12 2008 New Revision: 142169 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142169 Log: 2008-11-24 Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/37926] Program gives wrong output (connected to char len)

2008-11-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 19:20 --- Subject: Bug 37926 Author: pault Date: Mon Nov 24 19:18:39 2008 New Revision: 142171 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142171 Log: 2008-11-24 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/37926] Program gives wrong output (connected to char len)

2008-11-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 19:20 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.3. Thanks for the report. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/37792] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer; works with -fno-range-check

2008-11-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 19:14 --- Subject: Bug 37792 Author: pault Date: Mon Nov 24 19:13:12 2008 New Revision: 142169 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142169 Log: 2008-11-24 Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/37792] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer; works with -fno-range-check

2008-11-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 19:21 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.3 Thanks for the report Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/38249] read(*,*) seems to have broken

2008-11-24 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 19:22 --- (In reply to comment #3) Now for the more difficult part. I'll attach a tar file containing a sample program and a makefile. It turns out that the problem isn't with the read at all, rather it arises when I

[Bug fortran/38249] read(*,*) seems to have broken

2008-11-24 Thread ronis at ronispc dot chem dot mcgill dot ca
--- Comment #6 from ronis at ronispc dot chem dot mcgill dot ca 2008-11-24 19:29 --- It works without -malign-double, but has worked with it for years. I understand that all modules (even thouse in MY libraries) have to be compiled with the same flags, but nothing seems to imply that

[Bug target/38254] New: [4.4 Regression] Revision 142160 causes PR27908 -O3

2008-11-24 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
On Linux/ia32 SMP, revision 142160 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg01194.html causes FAIL: PR27908 -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: PR27908 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test -- Summary: [4.4 Regression] Revision 142160 causes PR27908

[Bug fortran/37319] [4.4 regression] gfortran.dg/function_kinds_5.f90 fails

2008-11-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 19:32 --- The problem still reproduces on the SPARC as of today. When the compiler is rebuilt at -O0, it goes away; when decl.c and parser.c are rebuilt at -O2, it comes back. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug fortran/38249] read(*,*) seems to have broken

2008-11-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 19:32 --- Not just all your modules but libgfortran also and all of glibc etc. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/37319] [4.4 regression] gfortran.dg/function_kinds_5.f90 fails

2008-11-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 19:32 --- Investigating. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/38167] [4.2 Regression] Accessor to stdin breaks on -O2 optimization

2008-11-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.2.4 Known to work||4.4.0 4.3.0

[Bug fortran/38249] read(*,*) seems to have broken

2008-11-24 Thread ronis at ronispc dot chem dot mcgill dot ca
--- Comment #8 from ronis at ronispc dot chem dot mcgill dot ca 2008-11-24 19:36 --- I don't mean to be combative, but if EVERYTHING (glibc etc) needs to be build with -malign-double, not just fortran programs, then IMHO the flag is useless and should be removed. I've been using

  1   2   >