On 08/07/2009 12:31 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
L.N:
exc_ptr.1 = EXC_PTR_EXPR (N);
filter.1 = FILTER_EXPR (N);
Will exc_ptr.1 and filter.1 be gimple registers?
Yes.
Does the above have
virtual operands, thus are there any aliases to whatever EXP_PTR_EXPR
or FILTER_EXPR load?
No and no
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/06/2009 12:35 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>> { exc_ptr, filter } = EH_LANDING_PAD;
>>
>> Placeholder for the landing-pad rtl. Has 2 outputs
>> for both the exception pointer and the filter.
>
> I'm going to drop th
On 08/06/2009 12:35 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
{ exc_ptr, filter } = EH_LANDING_PAD;
Placeholder for the landing-pad rtl. Has 2 outputs
for both the exception pointer and the filter.
I'm going to drop this construct. Instead, I'm going to mark
the label, and have the land
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:19:03 +0100
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
2009/8/7 Maxim Dementiev:
It means that swap for user types could be defined either in std namespace
or in the user type namespace (argument-dependent name lookup).
Yes, this is intentional. swap() is a point of customisation point,
s
2009/8/7 Maxim Dementiev:
>
> It means that swap for user types could be defined either in std namespace
> or in the user type namespace (argument-dependent name lookup).
Yes, this is intentional. swap() is a point of customisation point,
see http://www.ddj.com/cpp/184401876 and the definition in
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 15:48 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Janis, it would be extremely useful to have dg-options that are only
> enabled for certain languages, so I can do
>
> /* { dg-options "-std=c99" { dg-require-effective-target c } } */
> /* { dg-options "" { dg-require-effective-target
Hi,
Let's have a look at std::pair<>::swap and std::lower_bound<> implementations.
1. pair::swap in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/bits/stl_pair.h?view=markup
void
swap(pair& __p)
{
using std::swap;
swap(first, __p.first);
sw
2009/8/7 Janis Johnson :
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 00:06 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>> Often I want to test the exactly same testcase in C and C++, so I find
>> myself adding duplicate tests under gcc.dg/ and g++.dg/. Would it be
>> possible to have a shared testsuite dir that is run for both
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:38:01PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> I've been thinking about that lately, it would be useful for several
> kinds of functionality. We'd want effective targets for the language
> for using different options and for providing different error/warning
> checks for each lan
I asked similar question regarding PRE_INC/POST_INC quite a while ago,
and there were quite some discussions. Haven't check whether the situation
changed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00032.html
Bingfeng Mei
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gc
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Florent Defay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a new port.
>
> The target machine supports post-increment and pre-decrement
> addressing modes. These modes are twice faster than indexed mode.
> It is important for us that GCC consider them well.
GCC does support ge
thanks, But b=a is a assignment statement. It is doing some memory operations
isn't it. Assuming b=a is a dead statement, how r the following i386
assembly statements generated
pushl %ebp
movl%esp, %ebp
andl$-16, %esp
subl$16, %esp
movl$5, 4(%esp)
Hi -
Nicolas wrote:
> Anyone has an idea of the git version running on gcc.gnu.org? It is
> certainly buggy and needs fixing.
It was 1.6.3.2 now it's 1.6.4, practically spring chickens.
> Anyway... To solve your problem, you simply need to run 'git gc' with
> the --prune=now [...]
> And BTW,
Hi,
I am working on a new port.
The target machine supports post-increment and pre-decrement
addressing modes. These modes are twice faster than indexed mode.
It is important for us that GCC consider them well.
I wrote emails to gcc-help and I was told that GCC was not so good at
pre/post-dec/in
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:50 PM, pms wrote:
>
> Hi,
> We've a problem here. we were trying to use cc1 with & without -O
> option to verify the optimizations happening in our sample code. these r the
> list of outputs after each compilation
> without -O
> p...@shiva:~/Desktop/Compilers/GCC/build/
Hi,
We've a problem here. we were trying to use cc1 with & without -O
option to verify the optimizations happening in our sample code. these r the
list of outputs after each compilation
without -O
p...@shiva:~/Desktop/Compilers/GCC/build/test$ ls
1.c1.c.011t.ehopt1.c.0
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
> Possibly we could modify the algorithm that enumerates directories matching
> "$tool.*" to look for (e.g.) "*$tool.*" and then name directories like
> "c.c++.dg"?
The algorithm is hardcoded in core DejaGnu (runtest.exp).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codeso
Mr. Vivek Varghese Jacob wrote:
> hey,
>
> i would like to know the latest stable version of gcc...
> i have went through the website..
>
> waiting for the reply,
>
> vivek
There are two stable release branches maintained at any time, one current and
one previous, and the most recent versions
2009/8/7 Mr. Vivek Varghese Jacob:
>
> i would like to know the latest stable version of gcc...
> i have went through the website..
Did you miss the front page? And the releases page?
If you still can't find the information* please send your question to
gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org instead.
Jonathan
*
hey,
i would like to know the latest stable version of gcc...
i have went through the website..
waiting for the reply,
vivek
20 matches
Mail list logo
