Stefan Dösinger writes:
>Unfortunately I need support for the swap suffix in as, so using the system
>binaries is not an option. Is the only thing I can do to find the source of
>the as version, backport the swap suffix and hope for the best?
Another option might be a hack like this:
(d
Margaret Doll wrote:
> I was following the instructions on the build from
> http://gcc.gnu.org/java/build-snapshot.html
>
> 5. Compile and install gcc/gcj/libgcj
> $ cd compile
> $ mkdir objdir
> $ cd objdir
> $ ../gcc/configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/home/joerg/gcc \
> --enable-sha
On 09/04/2009 02:51 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I haven't been able to figure out what command to issue from the command
line to reproduce this. Cut and paste from the dejagnu log doesn't
work, which is more than annoying...
There is a blurb about this on http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DebuggingGCC
Th
Paolo Bonzini writes:
>Are there non-Microsoft DLLs that expect to be hooked this way? If
>so, I think the patch is interesting for gcc independent of whether it
>is useful for Wine.
Stefan Dösinger writes:
>I haven't seen any so far. ...
If this patch is essentially only for one application, ma
> Same for i386-unknown-freebsd7.2:
>
> Comparing stages 2 and 3
> warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
> warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
> warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
> Bootstrap comparison failure!
> gcc/cfgloopmanip.o differs
> gmake[2]: *** [compare] Error 1
>
>
> You can rely on gcc being able to work with the MacOS-X 'binutils' aka:
> ld, as. But don't try to build it for yourself. It's somehow like sparc
> solaris, rely on the systems as/ld.
Not quite, GNU as works very well on SPARC/Solaris (and probably better than
the system assembler); GNU ld work
Are there non-Microsoft DLLs that expect to be hooked this way? If
so, I think the patch is interesting for gcc independent of whether it
is useful for Wine.
I haven't seen any so far. Its certainly possible some server apps
have the 2 byte nop at the beginning of functions for a similar hot-
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 16:35, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Friday 04 September 2009 14:49:42 schrieb Stefan Dösinger:
>> I attached another version of the patch - I restarted the compile, so I
>> still don't know if it fully works.
> Seems to be working - gcc compiles fine, my test function has the
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, FX wrote:
> Filed as PR 41245.
Same for i386-unknown-freebsd7.2:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/cfgloopmanip.o differs
g
