--- Comment #5 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2009-12-11 19:27 ---
Thanks for the fast response!
Everything else we have works with -std=c++0x.
If this issue is fixed I could keep testing with -std=c++0x,
which I imagine could be of great value long term.
(We have several 100k of sources +
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 21:04 ---
Subject: Bug 42219
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 11 21:03:55 2009
New Revision: 155177
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155177
Log:
PR c++/42219
* typeck.c (error_type_p): New.
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-11 21:04
---
Thanks. This specific issue I will fix in one day or so. But be warned that
until DR 1133 is resolved by the ISO C++ Committee likely you will encounter
problems with list::splice and list::merge.
--
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 21:08 ---
Subject: Bug 40290
Author: dfranke
Date: Fri Dec 11 21:08:39 2009
New Revision: 155179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155179
Log:
2009-12-11 Daniel Franke franke.dan...@gmail.com
PR
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 21:10 ---
Fixed in trunk. Closing.
Thanks for the report!
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 21:39
---
All is well again.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 21:44 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I wonder why this is not caught in parse.c's verify_st_order; the error
message there is much nicer
Because it seems that verify_st_order is not called for every accepted
statement. In
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 22:05 ---
Subject: Bug 42352
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Dec 11 22:04:56 2009
New Revision: 155180
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155180
Log:
2009-12-11 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-11 22:10
---
list::sort (both overloads) should be fine now, if you notice something
strange, please let me know...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #11 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 22:12 ---
Hah. It looks like there are several slightly different problems at play here.
Apparently I just fixed one of them, which I was the one I narrowed in the
reduced test case above.
Then I forgot to try my fix on the
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 22:20 ---
For the example in #1, the wrong name is picked up in trans-array.c
(gfc_trans_array_bound_check):
2310 if (!name se-loop se-loop-ss se-loop-ss-expr
2311 se-loop-ss-expr-symtree)
2312name =
--- Comment #14 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 22:28 ---
Test case:
http://users.erols.com/dnagle/pub/async_io.f03
Works with ifort, fails with gfortran. I think it needs real asynchronous I/O
to work. Additionally, gfortran does not yet support the ASYNCHRONOUS
--- Comment #15 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 22:28 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Test case:
http://users.erols.com/dnagle/pub/async_io.f03
which additionally needs the file/module:
http://users.erols.com/dnagle/pub/f03def.f90
--
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 22:30 ---
I think this one is actually ok. The message is emitted rank-times, once for
each non-integer rank, for each variable.
Here we get it three times:
real, parameter :: n = 2
real, dimension(n) :: x, y, z
end
--- Comment #12 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 22:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=19278)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19278action=view)
Draft patch
Here is the patch I am testing.
It seems to be working fine so far.
Note that g++ says the code is
--- Comment #13 from jacob dot benoit dot 1 at gmail dot com 2009-12-11
22:51 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Note that g++ says the code is not valid though. Did you expect it to compile
without error ?
The .ii file I have attached? Yes, I was expecting it to be correct, it
compiles
Hi there,
the attached code compiles with nagfor but fails to do so with
gfortran 4.5.0 rev. 155016:
gfcbug96.f90:45.33:
end module concrete_inner_product
1
Error: Name 'vtype$vector_class' at (1) is an ambiguous reference to
'vtype$vect
or_class' from module
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2009-12-11 22:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=19279)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19279action=view)
Reduced demo code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42353
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 22:55 ---
*** Bug 39192 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38303
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 22:55 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38303 ***
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:05 ---
Subject: Bug 42257
Author: janus
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:05:02 2009
New Revision: 155183
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155183
Log:
gcc/fortran/
2009-12-11 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:05 ---
I think
/* Put the integral type with the bigger precision first. */
else if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (f1-type)
INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (f2-type)
TYPE_PRECISION (f1-type) !=
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:06 ---
Fixed with r155183. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |tree-optimization
GCC host triplet|
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:09
---
Completely unclear what this bug is about.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:10 ---
A regression because it works with 4.4.x?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42344
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42347
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:13 ---
Confirmed. Thanks for reporting.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-12-11 23:23 ---
Completely unclear what this bug is about.
What is unclear?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42220
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42256
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42006
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 41961
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:37 ---
Subject: Bug 42237
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42217
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42251
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42225
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 41611
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42057
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:37 ---
Subject: Bug 42069
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42183
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:37 ---
Subject: Bug 42193
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42196
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42110
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42244
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 41906
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42084
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42164
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 41905
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:39 ---
Subject: Bug 42142
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:38 ---
Subject: Bug 42317
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:39 ---
Subject: Bug 42154
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:39 ---
Subject: Bug 42025
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 23:39 ---
Subject: Bug 42078
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Dec 11 23:36:24 2009
New Revision: 155184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155184
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
gfortran currently treats C_LOC as suitable for initialization expressions;
however, it does not seem to be valid in either Fortran 2003 nor Fortran 2008.
use iso_c_binding
implicit none
integer, target :: a
type t
type(c_ptr) :: ptr = c_loc(a)
end type t
type(c_ptr) :: ptr2 = c_loc(a)
end
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-12 00:27 ---
The testcase with the options shown in the submitter's description compiles
cleanly with the current 4.4 branch and with GCC 4.4.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42294
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41481
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41514
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41653
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42226
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40900
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40887
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40815
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40783
I don't think I can provide the source code.
But maybe the debug output already provides some hints.
This is using boost 1_39
--
Summary: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
--- Comment #1 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2009-12-12 01:34
---
Created an attachment (id=19280)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19280action=view)
console output of the compiler
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
--- Comment #2 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2009-12-12 01:36
---
maybe on Monday I can create an instance like described of the offending
classes
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
--- Comment #3 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2009-12-12 01:37
---
the compiler takes more than 10GB of RAM.
There is 40GB of RAM available.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
--- Comment #4 from peter_foelsche at agilent dot com 2009-12-12 01:40
---
the same happens with boost 1_40
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42355
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-12 01:45 ---
Subject: Bug 42234
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Dec 12 01:45:12 2009
New Revision: 155191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155191
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-12 01:45 ---
Subject: Bug 42269
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Dec 12 01:45:12 2009
New Revision: 155191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155191
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-12 01:45 ---
Subject: Bug 42166
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Dec 12 01:45:12 2009
New Revision: 155191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155191
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-12 01:45 ---
Subject: Bug 42299
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Dec 12 01:45:12 2009
New Revision: 155191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155191
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-12 01:45 ---
Subject: Bug 42215
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Dec 12 01:45:12 2009
New Revision: 155191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155191
Log:
Backport testcases from trunk.
2009-12-11 H.J. Lu
--- Comment #9 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2009-12-12 05:49 ---
Thanks very much for the quick fix!
It didn't clear up all errors of this type, though, when compiling our code (I
verified that the original problem is fixed). Based on your comments I decided
to remove the -std=c++x0 for
This code:
templatetypename T
class freeList {
public:
T* newNode() { return 0; }
templatetypename U
T* newNode(U u) { return newNode()-init(u); }
templatetypename U, typename V
T* newNode(U u, V v) { return newNode()-init(u, v); }
};
class bar {};
class
101 - 176 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
