Gary Funck writes:
> Consider the following:
>
> $ cat -n t.c
> 1
> 2 int A[10] = { 0 };
> 3
> 4 int main()
> 5 {
> 6A[10] = 10;
> 7A[-1] = -1;
> 8return 0;
> 9 }
>
> In a compiler test case that I reviewed recently, there was the
> exp
Consider the following:
$ cat -n t.c
1
2 int A[10] = { 0 };
3
4 int main()
5 {
6A[10] = 10;
7A[-1] = -1;
8return 0;
9 }
In a compiler test case that I reviewed recently, there was the
expectation that the compiler would issue a compile-
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20101007 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20101007/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Michael Meissner wrote on 2010/10/07 20:21:38:
>
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 04:50:50PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Why not offer some of this on PowerPC32? mcmodel=small would probably be
> > enough.
>
> Well as they say, contributions are welcome. Note, 32-bit mode doesn't need
Yes, but
* Naveen H. S wrote on Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:44:40AM CEST:
> >> Nick, Naveen, the diff between the GCC and the src commits is this;
> >> which variant is correct?
> >> -noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
> >> +noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libgcj}"
>
> The following v
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:23, Basile Starynkevitch
wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:55:46 -0700
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>>
>> > Can we svn commit a patch after having compiled with a comment (like
>> > those of Laurynas) without an Ok from a reviewer? (I believ
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:55:46 -0700
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>
> > Can we svn commit a patch after having compiled with a comment (like
> > those of Laurynas) without an Ok from a reviewer? (I believe not, but I
> > am thinking that some patches went into trunk with
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 04:50:50PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Why not offer some of this on PowerPC32? mcmodel=small would probably be
> enough.
Well as they say, contributions are welcome. Note, 32-bit mode doesn't need
this when compiling for the main program, since it does addis/addi al
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> Can we svn commit a patch after having compiled with a comment (like
> those of Laurynas) without an Ok from a reviewer? (I believe not, but I
> am thinking that some patches went into trunk without an ok on
> gcc-patches@).
You do need to have an OK from somebody
Hello All,
I am a bit confused about the (GCC social) rules to commit a patch to
the GCC trunk svn, in particular after having read
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00419.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00486.html and other
messages in that thread. I also am not
Hello Gerald,
Our mirror address has been changed from
http://gcc.parentinginformed.com/
to
http://gcc.parentingamerica.com/
Please update your list to use the new URL.
Also please use new e-mail to contact me when necessary:
jmil...@parentingamerica.com.
Thank you.
Best wishes,
James Mille
On 07/10/2010 05:01, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> FYI, in case anyone else runs into this and comes here looking for
> information: a fix is on the way for the "multiple definitions of various
> include-path-related things" problem currently breaking bootstrap on Cygwin.
> Hope to have it working again
Michael Meissner wrote on 2010/10/07 15:00:25:
>
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:56:55AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 10/05/2010 06:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/10/05 15:47:38:
> > >> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> > >>> While doing relocation work on u-
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 02:40 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>> Especially one that doesn't require each function
>> to calculate the GOT address in the function prologue(why is that so?)
>
> Because PIC code can be called from non-PIC code and becaus
Richard Henderson wrote on 2010/10/06 00:13:22:
>
> On 10/05/2010 02:40 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Especially one that doesn't require each function
> > to calculate the GOT address in the function prologue(why is that so?)
>
> Because PIC code can be called from non-PIC code and because
> th
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:56:55AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 06:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Ian Lance Taylor wrote on 2010/10/05 15:47:38:
> >> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> >>> While doing relocation work on u-boot I often whish for strings/const data
> >>> to be access
16 matches
Mail list logo
