Hi all,
I am facing with a GCSE problem on this GCC
testsuite(gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr38819.c),using
GCC-4.4.0:
extern void exit (int);
extern void abort (void);
volatile int a = 1;
volatile int b = 0;
volatile int x = 2;
volatile signed int
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20101012 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20101012/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
DJ Delorie writes:
> * doc/tm.texi.in (TARGET_ASM_JUMP_ALIGN_MAX_SKIP): New.
> (TARGET_ASM_LABEL_ALIGN_AFTER_BARRIER_MAX_SKIP): Change to hook.
> (TARGET_ASM_LOOP_ALIGN_MAX_SKIP): Likewise.
> (TARGET_ASM_LABEL_ALIGN_MAX_SKIP): Likewise.
>
> * targhooks.h (default_lab
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Art Haas wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The bootstrap problems I've been having on the x86 Solaris machine,
> plus the reply from maintainer Rainer Orth that his builds have
> been succeeding were the impetus to investigate how 'git bisect'
> works. After a bit of fumbling aroun
Hi.
The bootstrap problems I've been having on the x86 Solaris machine,
plus the reply from maintainer Rainer Orth that his builds have
been succeeding were the impetus to investigate how 'git bisect'
works. After a bit of fumbling around, including a rebuild of
an apparently miscompiled 'git' bin
A week and a day after the LLVM 2.8 release, I'm pleased to announce
the availability of the corresponding dragonegg release. Get it while
it's hot! http://dragonegg.llvm.org/#gettingrelease
Duncan.
Dear Ravi,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:56:33AM +0530, ravi s wrote:
> > Is there a way to get the assembly code coverage just like we have it for
> > source code like C/C++/Fortran ?
> > -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage doesn't seem to work with assembly (*.S)
> > files.
Iirc the gcc approach
I have booked a 2 bedroom suite at Les Suites for 10/24 - 28 (4 nights).
Anyone willing to share costs can take the other room.
Cheers, Jim.
Sorry, I mean if I had built a VAR_DECL node as well as its
DECL_INITIAL, where should I place the node? Since it is a global
variable, can I just build the VAR_DECL node without placing it in any
container, say symbol table or anywhere else?
Thanks,
Hongtao
On 10/12/10 10:11, Hongtao wrote:
Dear All,
How can I build a new global variable as well as its initializer on Gimple?
Thanks,
Hongtao Yu
Purdue Univeristy
Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode wrote on 2010/10/09 18:32:40:
>
> Michael Meissner wrote on 2010/10/07
20:21:38:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 04:50:50PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > Why not offer some of this on PowerPC32? mcmodel=small would
probably be enough.
> >
> > Well as they say
Alan Modra wrote on 2010/10/11 14:58:45:
>
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:20:06AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Now I have had a closer look at this and it looks much like -fpic
> > on ppc32, you still use the GOT/TOC to load the address where the data is.
>
> No, with ppc64 -mcmodel=medium you
12 matches
Mail list logo
