On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org writes:
The asm fails to mention that it modifies *regs.
It has a memory clobber, that should be enough, no?
No. A memory clobber does not cover automatic storage.
Btw, I can't see a
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Currently, the middle end seems to use the same rules for handling constant
overflow of integer arithmetic and conversion between integer types: set
TREE_OVERFLOW on the INTEGER_CST if the type is signed and the value
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org writes:
The asm fails to mention that it modifies *regs.
It has a memory clobber, that should be enough, no?
No. A memory
Hello again,
I have another, quick question: I have dedicated logical instructions in
my RISC machine (lt - less than, gt - greater than, ult - unsigned less
than, etc.). I'm also working on adding instructions for logical OR, AND,
NOT, XOR. While reading GCC internals, I've stumbled on this:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org writes:
The asm fails to mention that it modifies *regs.
It
On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org writes:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:47:59AM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
I don't know about 4.5, but I noticed that with 4.6 (trunk), testcasese
like gcc.c-torture/compile/2804-1.c optimize away the asm and all the
operand generation except for -O0.
That's fine, the asm isn't volatile and the output
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Andi Kleen wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org writes:
The asm fails to mention that it modifies *regs.
It has a memory
On 11/04/2010 11:28 AM, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
I think of adding a warning too. Should I submit a patch?
That's always a good idea. :)
Paolo
On 11/05/2010 07:00 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
To the steering committee: I propose Ralf Wildenhues as a new maintainer
for the build machinery.
Ralf often has useful comments for proposed patches to the configure
scripts. He has done good work in upgrading to new versions of autoconf
and
On 11/05/2010 08:10 AM, Jay K wrote:
the checking for puts_locked...
the fact that asm_fprintf calls putc one character at a time,
which probably benefits from _unlocked.
Honest question: is asm_fprintf in the profile at all, even at -O0?
Paolo
I am confident in the correctness of the tests I wrote for overflow for C
(gcc.dg/overflow-warn-[1234].c). This doesn't necessarily mean the
present mixture of ways of indicating that an expression of integer
constants is not an integer constant expression (for whatever combination
of reasons
Dave Korn dave.korn.cyg...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/10/27 13:59:00:
On 27/10/2010 07:47, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote on 2010/10/27 04:01:50:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:53:00AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
On 26/10/2010 23:37, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Everything
Hi, I just started playing around with named address spaces for avr.
Besides general space (ram), I introduced a second one, __pgm, which
shall address program memory where also constants may live. avr is
havard architecture, and both program memory and ram start at address 0.
From this and the
Georg Lay schrieb:
FYI, the code is as expected when I define the addrspaces to be
subsets of each other.
Georg
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Georg Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Hi, I just started playing around with named address spaces for avr.
Besides general space (ram), I introduced a second one, __pgm, which
shall address program memory where also constants may live. avr is
havard architecture, and
Richard Guenther schrieb:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Georg Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Hi, I just started playing around with named address spaces for avr.
Besides general space (ram), I introduced a second one, __pgm, which
shall address program memory where also constants may live. avr is
Radu Hobincu radu.hobi...@arh.pub.ro writes:
I have another, quick question: I have dedicated logical instructions in
my RISC machine (lt - less than, gt - greater than, ult - unsigned less
than, etc.). I'm also working on adding instructions for logical OR, AND,
NOT, XOR. While reading GCC
On 08/11/2010 11:20, Andi Kleen wrote:
An asm with live inputs and outputs should never be optimized
way. If 4.5.1 started doing that it's seriously broken.
I don't see that. Consider:
void foo (void)
{
int x, y, z;
x = 23;
y = x + 1;
z = y + 1;
}
So far, you'd agree the
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:11:44AM +0200, roy rosen wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to use define_split, but it seems to me that I don't
understand how it is used.
It says in the gccint.pdf (which I use as my tutorial (is there
anything better or more up to date?)) that the combiner only uses
On 08/11/10 16:59, Georg Lay wrote:
Richard Guenther schrieb:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Georg Laya...@gjlay.de wrote:
Hi, I just started playing around with named address spaces for avr.
Besides general space (ram), I introduced a second one, __pgm, which
shall address program memory
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:41:49AM +0100, Georg Lay wrote:
This solution works:
Generating a named insn in andsi3-expander as
(define_insn_and_split ...
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 register_operand )
(and:SI (match_operand:SI 1 register_operand )
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:21:14PM +0800, Hui Yan Cheah wrote:
Hi,
We are working on a new project which requires a retargetting a
compiler to a small cpu on FPGA.
The cpu is hand-coded and it supports only a limited number of instruction
sets.
My questions are:
1. Since I have very
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 04:52:28PM +0200, roy rosen wrote:
Hi All,
Is it possible to define UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD as a global variable and
to set this varibale using a pragma (even once for a compilation) and
that way to be able to compile one file with UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD = 8
and another
On 08/11/2010 13:44, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
One ping and a few days later and nothing. Very frustrating. I don't
believe all PPC devs are so busy that none has the time to look
at a simple one liner. What is up?
There's only the one of him. He probably is that busy. He's a very nice
Who do I need to talk to in order to resolve the various licensing
issues so this becomes possible?
Walter Bright
Digital Mars
http://www.digitalmars.com
free C, C++, D programming language compilers
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Walter Bright wrote:
Who do I need to talk to in order to resolve the various licensing issues so
this becomes possible?
The FSF, via the Steering Committee, via this list. The standard
assignment and licensing policies are as described in the Mission
Statement
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Walter Bright wrote:
Who do I need to talk to in order to resolve the various licensing issues so
this becomes possible?
The FSF, via the Steering Committee, via this list. The standard
assignment and licensing policies are as described
latOn Mon, 2010-11-08 at 21:13 +, Dave Korn wrote:
On 08/11/2010 13:44, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
One ping and a few days later and nothing. Very frustrating. I don't
believe all PPC devs are so busy that none has the time to look
at a simple one liner. What is up?
There's only the
This is what I done.
It works well.
Thanks to everybody.
2010/11/8 Michael Meissner meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 04:52:28PM +0200, roy rosen wrote:
Hi All,
Is it possible to define UNITS_PER_SIMD_WORD as a global variable and
to set this varibale using a pragma (even
2010/11/8 Michael Meissner meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:11:44AM +0200, roy rosen wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to use define_split, but it seems to me that I don't
understand how it is used.
It says in the gccint.pdf (which I use as my tutorial (is there
anything
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46353
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
08:11:43 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Nov 8 08:11:38 2010
New Revision: 166429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166429
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46353
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
--- Comment #16 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2010-11-08 08:18:31
UTC ---
The revised patch:
Index: gcc/tree-vrp.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vrp.c(revision 166426)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46356
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 09:04:03 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Nov 8 09:03:50 2010
New Revision: 166430
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166430
Log:
2010-11-08 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 09:20:48 UTC ---
r166430 fixes the test cases in comment #0 and #4 and the one in PR 46345.
However, the problem in comment #5 persists. Reduced test case:
module m
type t1
end type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
Summary: i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
09:30:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Last patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00052.html
Review comments by Ian Taylor were:
* More macros now refer to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46356
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 09:32:26 UTC ---
Reduced test case:
IMPLICIT NONE
TYPE :: ParentVector
INTEGER :: a
END TYPE ParentVector
CONTAINS
SUBROUTINE vector_operation(pvec)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44206
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #21 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
10:16:19 UTC ---
jason at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes:
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
16:36:01 UTC ---
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
10:35:27 UTC ---
And apparently went away in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166167
Guess we just want to add the testcase into the testsuite, unless the r166167
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46357
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
10:44:31 UTC ---
We always use zero/sign-extending moves to avoid partial register stalls.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46355
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28627
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 10:49:44
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Nov 8 10:49:38 2010
New Revision: 166431
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166431
Log:
2010-11-08 Kai Tietz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-11-08
11:01:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
And apparently went away in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166167
Guess we just want to add the testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
--- Comment #2 from Kay Hayen kayhayen at gmx dot de 2010-11-08 11:03:31 UTC
---
Created attachment 22319
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22319
Warning for \0 in raw strings test case
Well, here it is.
Use like this: g++ -c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359
Summary: [4.6 Regression] symbol missing from 4.6 libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
11:27:33 UTC ---
As usual this might be as well a type-merging problem in the Frontend.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
11:37:21 UTC ---
is this Bug 46221 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #19 from Jay jay.krell at cornell dot edu 2010-11-08 11:50:35 UTC
---
Hey, g++ 4.0 doesn't even like all of the code.
You have to try all targets to uncover some of it.
target=alpha-dec-vms:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
--- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-08 11:56:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 22320
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22320
List of unexpected failures
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
12:03:23 UTC ---
I will investigate this a bit now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in release_defs, at
tree-ssanames.c:313
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
12:15:02 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Nov 8 12:14:51 2010
New Revision: 166433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166433
Log:
PR target/46208
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
12:26:16 UTC ---
The motivating examples in the original raw strings proposal are for
simplifying regular expressions and HTML markup, there's no mention of binary
blobs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46361
Summary: bugzilla: mid-air collision message is misleading
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
Summary: [4.6 regression] lto-plugin.c doesn't compile on IRIX
6.5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46363
Summary: [bugzilla] WAITING state confirms bug
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #20 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-11-08 13:12:11 UTC ---
There really is absolutely no point experimenting with this option
anywhere other than on trunk. Maybe we should just disable it on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
Summary: basic_string.h:541:32: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
Simon number.cruncher at ntlworld dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
14:18:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 22323
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22323
patch
Patch. Testing on x86_64-linux, testing elsewhere is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
Summary: gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894
--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
14:27:46 UTC ---
I think the example is invalid in c++ 2003 as [temp.param/9] says that
a function template shall not have any default template argument. It's
valid in c++0x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
14:36:32 UTC ---
I'll give it a spin on powerpc64-linux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 14:39:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
The error seems to be sensitive to the first letter of the type(t1) variable.
All names starting with 'w'-'z' fail, others seem to work. Also the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
14:39:51 UTC ---
The problem seems to be that on the c.f90:
...
D.1548.i.data = 0B;
atmp.7.dtype = 3113;
atmp.7.dim[0].stride = 1;
atmp.7.dim[0].lbound = 0;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at
varasm.c:1033
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression
'((unsigned char*)*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46370
Summary: [OOP] ALLOCATE: Error allocating CLASS coarrays
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
15:02:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 22326
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22326
preprocessed source
Hm, it seems initial attachment doesn't work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
