Hi colleagues,
The follow program is an abstraction of on application where it
produce an error in runtime and i don't know why it's success.
The program compile very good in all cases with Visual Studio 2005,
2008, 2010, MinGW 4.5.1 on Windows 7 and with GCC 4.3 on GNU Debian.
Though, it produce
Hi Gilberto,
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 09:47:43AM -0500, Gilberto Cuba Ricardo wrote:
> Hi colleagues,
>
> The follow program is an abstraction of on application where it
> produce an error in runtime and i don't know why it's success.
>
> The program compile very good in all cases with Visual Stud
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20101114 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20101114/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
It appears that reload_combine does not take exceptions into account.
When it encounters a BARRIER it forgets all register uses after this
point. But an exception can transfer control to any of the CODE_LABELs
and jump back to after the BARRIER, with the registers still in use.
See PR46395 for a t
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> To the steering committee: I propose Ralf Wildenhues as a new
>> maintainer for the build machinery.
> I've relayed this proposal, thanks Ian.
I am happy to announce Ralf's appointment as build machinery maintainer.
As usual, happy hacking, Ralf -- an
Gcc 4.5.1 running on an amd64 box "cross"-compiling for a P3 i8k fails
to compile the module since commit 6b4e81db2552bad04100e7d5ddeed7e848f53b48
with:
CC drivers/char/i8k.o
drivers/char/i8k.c: In function ‘i8k_smm’:
drivers/char/i8k.c:149:2: error: can't find a register in class ‘GENERAL_
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 4:52 PM, James Cloos wrote:
> Gcc 4.5.1 running on an amd64 box "cross"-compiling for a P3 i8k fails
> to compile the module since commit 6b4e81db2552bad04100e7d5ddeed7e848f53b48
> with:
>
> CC drivers/char/i8k.o
> drivers/char/i8k.c: In function ‘i8k_smm’:
> drivers/
Hi All,
Does it perform symbolic range analysis or array section analysis in
GCC-4.6 ?
Thanks,
Hongtao Yu
Purdue University
Thanks, this works.
gcc vs llvm
176.gcc: +3.7%
252.eon: +6.1%
David
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>
>> Though gcc leads LLVM in performance overrall, there are a couple of
>> benchmarks gcc is worse: vpr and crafty
