On Nov 26, 2010, at 3:51 AM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I'm investigating an ICE in loop-iv.c:get_biv_step(). I hope you can shed
>> some light on what the correct fix would be.
>>
>> The ICE happens when processing:
>> ==
>> (insn 111 (set (reg:SI 304)
>> (plus (subreg:SI (
Hi,
> I'm investigating an ICE in loop-iv.c:get_biv_step(). I hope you can shed
> some light on what the correct fix would be.
>
> The ICE happens when processing:
> ==
> (insn 111 (set (reg:SI 304)
>(plus (subreg:SI (reg:DI 251) 4)
> (const_int 1
>
> (
Hello!
/home/uros/gcc-svn/trunk/libjava/classpath/gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GtkComponentPeer.java:
In class 'gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GtkComponentPeer':
/home/uros/gcc-svn/trunk/libjava/classpath/gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GtkComponentPeer.java:
In method
'gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GtkComponentPeer.handleEvent(j
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20101125 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20101125/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:57:19 0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Sorry, I didnt note the attachment that is already your implementation.
> > I thought it was the old diff.
> > So: I'm ok with all. Thanks for the effort.
>
> OK, thanks. I'm going to conduct a bit more testing before installing it
> Sorry, I didnt note the attachment that is already your implementation.
> I thought it was the old diff.
> So: I'm ok with all. Thanks for the effort.
OK, thanks. I'm going to conduct a bit more testing before installing it.
What are the contributors to the patch? This is for the ChangeLog.
Status
==
The GCC 4.5 branch is in regression and documentation fixes only mode.
A 4.5.2 release is due this year (fingers crossing).
There are no serious regressions that would block the release at the moment.
Still there are a few wrong-code bugs that can have fixes backported
from trunk.
Hello GCC hackers!
You might know it already but the 2012 edition of the FOSDEM[1]
conference is approaching. Fast. It turns out the GNU project will have
a dedicated development room this time. So it would be nice if GCC
people could talk about their work there.
Please find below the formal Call
Hi,
gcc/config/pa/pa.c has
static inline void
pa_file_start_file (int want_version)
{
if (write_symbols != NO_DEBUG)
{
output_file_directive (asm_out_file, main_input_filename);
if (want_version)
aputs ("\t.version\t\"01.01\"\n");
}
}
and
static void
pa_linux_file_
"David Mathog" writes:
> Yup, my bad, put in d where it should have been ll. Also fixed the
> problem I induced in sse2-check.h, where too large a chunk was commented
> out, that was causing the gcc -Wall -msse2 problem. The changed part in
> the original source was
>
> if ((edx & bit_SSE2) &
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 24/11/2010 14:17, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> I don't see why RTL optimizers should be different from tree optimizers.
>
> I thought half the point of tree-ssa in the first place was to separate
> optimisation out from target-specific stuff
11 matches
Mail list logo
