Hi Ian
Thanks for the response.
All of those flags are set correctly, though it is still emitting
loads and stores 4 byte aligned and not 8. I'm trying to get the
compiler to combine two 4 byte loads in to a single 8 byte load as it
is more efficient on this architecture, so I'm guessing because
I'm trying to implement long jump and I'm using the call instruction
in the arm implementation as a reference.
The code looks like this:
rtx callee, pat;
callee = XEXP(operands[0], 0);
if (GET_CODE (callee) == SYMBOL_REF
? atdsp_is_long_call_p (SYMBOL_REF_DECL (callee))
Hi, guys.
I'm compiling gcc-4.4.2 on an Arm similar machine with Java enabled.
Compilation is completed, but a failure comes out when make install,
with the error of '"relink libgvm".
Do anyone know the reason of the failure?
I really appreciate your support.
: make ; exec true "AR_FLAGS=rc"
Status
==
GCC 4.5.2 has been released, the release will be announced after
mirrors have catched up. The branch is now open for regression
and documentation fixes again.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from Last Report
--- ---
Is there any change I should do to the Makefile.in or any other files? Is there
any specific header files I should add ? (I have c-family/c-common.h).
Regards,
Bobby
- Original Message
From: Ian Lance Taylor
To: Robert Stevenson
Cc: g...@gnu.org
Sent: Wed, December 15, 2010 11:1
Hi,
I was hit by an ICE in reload. You know how difficult to debug it ☺.
My primary suspect is that eliminate_regs_in_insn transforms
(insn 680 679 681 84 src/weighted_prediction.c:729 (set (reg:DF 1 r1)
(mem:DF (plus:SI (mult:SI (reg:SI 596 [ ivtmp.474 ])
(const_in
Hello,
* majia gm wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:21:14PM CET:
> I'm compiling gcc-4.4.2 on an Arm similar machine with Java enabled.
> Compilation is completed, but a failure comes out when make install,
> with the error of '"relink libgvm".
>
> Do anyone know the reason of the failure?
> I re
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20101216 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20101216/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Neil Hickey writes:
> I'm trying to implement long jump and I'm using the call instruction
> in the arm implementation as a reference.
>
> The code looks like this:
>
> rtx callee, pat;
>
> callee = XEXP(operands[0], 0);
> if (GET_CODE (callee) == SYMBOL_REF
> ? atdsp_is_long_ca
Robert Stevenson writes:
> Is there any change I should do to the Makefile.in or any other files? Is
> there
> any specific header files I should add ? (I have c-family/c-common.h).
We're happy to answer specific questions but it's nearly impossible for
us to answer general questions like the
"Bingfeng Mei" writes:
> I was hit by an ICE in reload. You know how difficult to debug it ☺.
>
> My primary suspect is that eliminate_regs_in_insn transforms
>
>
> (insn 680 679 681 84 src/weighted_prediction.c:729 (set (reg:DF 1 r1)
> (mem:DF (plus:SI (mult:SI (reg:SI 596 [ ivtmp.474
This release fixes the Linux relocatable kernel build:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12327
The follow Linux binutils releases are affected: 2.20.51.0.12,
2.21.51.0.1, 2.21.51.0.2 and 2.21.51.0.3. The FSF binutils 2.21
is also affected.
H.J.
---
This is the beta release of binu
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:50 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> This release fixes the Linux relocatable kernel build:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12327
> 1. binutils-2.21.51.0.4.tar.bz2. Source code.
> The primary sites for the beta Linux binutils are:
> 1. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux
Hello libstdc++ developers and users,
(I cc-ed gcc@gcc.gnu.org for a larger audience as others may offer
suggestions not as library developers but as C++ programmers. Sorry
in advance if this is spam to you.)
I'm planning to add a set of new performance diagnostics to the
libstdc++ profile mode
14 matches
Mail list logo
