On 01/06/2011 09:28 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Could be libtool issue or lib-link.m4 one (or gcj one). Can you send
./libtool --tag=GCJ --config
output?
I assume you mean from libjava in the build tree? Attached.
(Note this is now
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:31:28PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
2. A large number of bugs seem to not be targetted for any particular
release, e.g. of the 4389 open bugs, only 296 are listed as targetted
for 4.6.0. Why is there such a discrepency?
Incidentally, my main focus will be
On 7 January 2011 04:59, Tony Poppleton wrote:
Hi,
I would like to help with some gcc bug triage, and have a few
questions about doing so.
Excellent, thanks for volunteering your time.
For example, in cases where a bug doesn't have a test case as an
attachment, but instead embedded in the
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
5. Similarly, if I mark a bug as known to work in 4.5.2, will this
lead to it eventually being closed?
Yes, when the 4.4 release is closed, bugs known to work in 4.5 will be
closed.
That's not how it works. I did the last couple of branch
Thanks for the feedback.
Moving the test case into an attachment won't be useful. What would be
useful is recasting the test case into a form which can be used in the
gcc testsuite, if possible
Whilst I would like to be able to submit new test cases as I go, as
you (Ian) pointed out this may
Evening all,
Something has changed in the last few weeks that has resulted in, as the
subject says, non-virtual thunks (in this case, all specifically to dtors, but
I don't know if that is relevant or mere accident) no longer being emitted as
comdat for i686-pc-cygwin; I haven't checked
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com 2011-01-07 08:33:03
UTC ---
I still see this with r168558.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
08:43:35 UTC ---
I still see this with r168558.
Note that you need to reinstall gnatgcc, the problem is there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47196
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47201
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47201
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
09:06:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 22920
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22920
gcc46-pr47201.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47202
Summary: Endless recursion during mangling
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47203
Summary: USE of module with same name as SUBROUTINE not reject,
but also not working
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
09:28:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
[...]
This has been implemented as a fix for PR46971.
Is there any issue left to be fixed? I think there isn't.
(Except for an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37430
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32164
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39515
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42168
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47204
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in gfc_free_namespace
(symbol.c:3323) on invalid code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47205
Summary: GCC emits optimized out noinline function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47206
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: SIGSEGV in cp_tree_equal
(tree.c:2150) with -fno-elide-constructors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45814
Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45979
Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47022
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
11:49:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 7 11:49:44 2011
New Revision: 168564
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168564
Log:
PR c++/47022
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47207
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p,
at cp/decl2.c:3563 on invalid code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46564
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2011-01-07 11:55:26
UTC ---
I opened PR47207 for the problem described in comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47022
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47203
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47208
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p,
at cp/decl2.c:3563 with missing #include
initializer_list
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47189
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07 12:08:48 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Jan 7 12:08:21 2011
New Revision: 168565
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168565
Log:
2011-01-07 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47194
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07 12:08:48 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Jan 7 12:08:21 2011
New Revision: 168565
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168565
Log:
2011-01-07 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
--- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07 12:16:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Is there any issue left to be fixed? I think there isn't.
(Except for an accepts-invalid diagnostic for comment 7 [module m vs.
subroutine m,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in should_emit_struct_debug
(dwarf2out.c:627) with -femit-struct-debug-baseonly -g
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47210
Summary: Compile error on type specifier in a friend declaration
designates a class type
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47211
Summary: ICE: in cp_build_addr_expr_1, at cp/typeck.c:4866 with
-fms-extensions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
actually it might be as easy as walking alias pairs after decl merging and
killing all pairs where decl has been replaced by different. This probably can
be done at same time as we rewrite IL.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44463
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-07 12:41:45 UTC
---
actually it might be as easy as walking alias pairs after decl merging and
killing all pairs where decl has been replaced by different. This probably can
be done
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47196
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
12:44:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
c) Build libquadmath but no Fortran REAL(16) support
If one wants to save a few KiB for Fortran but wants to us libquadmath,
extern int foo(void);
int main(void)
{
return foo() * 0;
}
This is because gimple part of optimizers for some reason leads to the
following in the optimized dump:
main ()
{
bb 2:
foo ();
return 0;
}
and only RTL optimizers do the trick.
This is weird since pure/const detect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47205
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-07 12:47:23 UTC
---
extern int foo(void);
int main(void)
{
return foo() * 0;
}
This is because gimple part of optimizers for some reason leads to the
following in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47205
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47205
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
12:51:58 UTC ---
Hmm, at second tought I guess statement gets improperly updated for lack of
side effect in fixup_cfg. Will look into it.
Even that is however not enough for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
--- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07 12:58:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
In the dump you can see that we end up with one vtab for both types.
This is easily fixed by putting the first letter of the derived type name in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
12:59:06 UTC ---
Submitted patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00051.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43309
--- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07 13:02:34
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 7 13:02:29 2011
New Revision: 168567
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168567
Log:
Backport from mainline:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47196
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
13:16:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
c) Build libquadmath but no Fortran REAL(16) support
This would be
--enable-libquadmath
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
--- Comment #21 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
13:25:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #18)
class(two_three), allocatable :: a1
class(three), allocatable :: a2
In the dump you can see that we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313
--- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
13:41:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
This is easily fixed by putting the first letter of the derived type name in
upper case:
[...]
(In reply to comment #21)
even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47210
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47210
--- Comment #2 from Ryou Ezoe boostcpp at gmail dot com 2011-01-07 14:02:43
UTC ---
Sorry, I didn't noticed that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47133
Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47206
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47207
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47212
Summary: [C++0x] crash on lambda returning lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47208
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47212
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47211
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43309
--- Comment #17 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07 15:27:50
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 7 15:27:47 2011
New Revision: 168575
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168575
Log:
Backport from mainline:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43309
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47213
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in determine_visibility (decl2.c:2076)
with -fvisibility-ms-compat
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47211
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2011-01-07 15:40:25
UTC ---
Thank you for your reply. I got that ICE when running the testsuite with
-fms-extensions in RUNTESTFLAGS (actually, this isn't the only ICE caused by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47141
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |law at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47204
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47214
Summary: False warning null argument where non-null required
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
16:19:34 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jan 7 16:19:29 2011
New Revision: 168579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168579
Log:
2011-01-07 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41580
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47211
Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
16:57:45 UTC ---
Please disregard the previous comment, I thought that was the case
because of a typo.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43682
Victor K. vityan at vityan dot sytes.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vityan at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43682
--- Comment #2 from Chen Chen aflyhorse at foxmail dot com 2011-01-07
17:17:05 UTC ---
I know it's about boehm-gc, and I've found that they have been solved in the
upstream. I come here one year ago to ask for a merge. I cannot handle the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47189
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47194
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47216
Summary: [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr43360.c FAILs with
-O -fPIC -fgcse -fgcse-sm -fnon-call-exceptions
-fno-tree-dse
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47204
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47204
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
--- Comment #4 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07 17:56:01
UTC ---
Jonathan
thanks for your comments - they are very useful and we certainly want to look
at performance. ;-)
I'm not terribly convinced by using spinlocks in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47217
Summary: builtin functions should emit debug data
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
Summary: [4.6.0 regression] C++ multiple definitions of
non-virtual thunk problem
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
18:11:39 UTC ---
I've updated mozilla tree and rebuilt with top of tree GCC. The resulting
binary seems to work well. Two GCC patches are required:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-07 18:13:33
UTC ---
Basically what happens that cgraph_node (decl) and e-callee have the
same former_clone_of one is not clone of each other. I am now about
to investigate how
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
18:21:03 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Jan 7 18:21:00 2011
New Revision: 168580
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168580
Log:
PR lto/45375
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
--- Comment #5 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07 18:23:10
UTC ---
I tried the same benchmark using pthread_spin_lock() and pthread_spin_unlock();
it takes about 11.4 seconds.
So, that means the time required to execute an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46557
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807
--- Comment #6 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2011-01-07 18:29:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 22928
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22928
pre-processor output of original reproducer
Created with (Fedora 14 64-bit):
g++ -E
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46523
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807
--- Comment #7 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2011-01-07 18:32:12 UTC ---
This command still produces the original ICE with gcc svn trunk rev. 168562:
Sorry, cut and paste error. The last command should have been
g++ -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46535
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47187
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
18:39:14 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 7 18:39:11 2011
New Revision: 168581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168581
Log:
PR bootstrap/47187
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47201
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
18:41:42 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 7 18:41:40 2011
New Revision: 168582
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168582
Log:
PR target/47201
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
--- Comment #6 from js-gcc at webkeks dot org js-gcc at webkeks dot org
2011-01-07 18:43:15 UTC ---
This means that, assuming that spinlocks are infinitely faster than mutexes,
in
the best possible conditions they would speed up the accessors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45721
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-07
18:43:49 UTC ---
path posted http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00375.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47187
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47201
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-01-07 19:16:42 UTC ---
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-05 22:31:14 UTC ---
* We should use i?86*-*-* (or
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
