Status
==
The trunk is still in Stage 4, open just for regression
bugfixes and documentation fixes. Significant effort has been made
recently to fix lots of regressions, yet there are still way too many
serious regressions. Please continue (or start to) fixing them.
Please also take time to
Hello,
I just got the following error message send by bugzilla / GCC's commit
script handler:
Can't locate mro.pm in @INC (@INC contains: . lib/i386-linux-thread-multi lib
CODE(0x958f8b4) /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.5
Le 26. 01. 11 11:29, Tobias Burnus a écrit :
Can't locate mro.pm in @INC
mro.pm is part of the core code of Perl since version 5.9.5. So it's not
available here as sourceware has Perl 5.8.5 installed. Where is this
script located? And did you get the exact line and script which threw
this error?
On 01/26/2011 12:05 PM, Frédéric Buclin wrote:
Le 26. 01. 11 11:29, Tobias Burnus a écrit :
Can't locate mro.pm in @INC
mro.pm is part of the core code of Perl since version 5.9.5. So it's not
available here as sourceware has Perl 5.8.5 installed. Where is this
script located? And did you get
Hi,
I am working on some GCC bug triage, and am unable to edit the known
to fail/work fields in Bugzilla, as well as modify the status of a
bug.
On the overseers list, Ian Lance Taylor suggested I post to this list
requesting a gnu.gcc.org email account, as they come with all the
necessary
Unsure if this is the right place to mention this, so excuse me if it is
not.
The 68hc11/68hc12 port page http://www.gnu.org/software/m68hc11/
is very out of date and was last updated in October 2003.
The creator of that port Stephane Carrez is no longer active (to my
knowledge) but his page
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Tony Poppleton
tony.popple...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am working on some GCC bug triage, and am unable to edit the known
to fail/work fields in Bugzilla, as well as modify the status of a
bug.
On the overseers list, Ian Lance Taylor suggested I post to this
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, James Murray j...@jsm-net.demon.co.uk wrote:
Unsure if this is the right place to mention this, so excuse me if it is
not.
The 68hc11/68hc12 port page http://www.gnu.org/software/m68hc11/
is very out of date and was last updated in October 2003.
The creator
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:40 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
Stephane Carrez is listed as maintainer of the port, so he should
know how to contribute fixes to the port upstream.
Yes, but as I said... he is no longer active on this port. His last
published contributions are 4+ years ago.
James
Thanks. Whilst I can see the change you made in my preferences
permissions screen, I don't seem to be able to edit any more of the
fields than I could before (I have logged out and back in again).
Tony
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed,
Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de writes:
Can't locate mro.pm in @INC
[...]
This may be fixed now, with a hand-made dummy mro.pm file.
- FChE
At Google we use a code review tool which was open sourced a couple of
years ago: Rietveld
(http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/rietveld.html).
The best way of thinking about it is bugzilla for patches. The
system creates an entry for every patch submitted, provides a web tool
for
Hello!
Telefons tev nomainijies?
Man te paradijas labs risinajums Tavam naudas problemam, tapec gribeju
piezvanit, bet numurs neatbild.
Skaidrs, lai vai tur kas, man viss super, tapec, ka es dabuju darbu,
kas ir vienkarshaks par vienkarshu un 4820 USD menesi bez problemam man atlec.
Vai nu
www.ertanturizm.com
Dilediğiniz tarih ve rotada kendi oluşturduğunuz grubunuz ile tekne kiralamak
isteyenler için günlük fiyat esasına göre kiralama imkanı,
Rota ve fiyat sormak için;
Ertan Tur.Tic.Ltd.Şti
Marmaris / Türkiye
0 535 226 0836
i...@ertanturizm.com
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
This is http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42524
aka http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206
Ah, yes. It seems I approved the fix for this in2006, but it never
went in.
Hmm, looking into Bugzilla Ralf did have an issue with the
* Gerald Pfeifer wrote on Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:04:03AM CET:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Andrew Haley wrote:
This is http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42524
aka http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206
Ah, yes. It seems I approved the fix for this in2006, but it never
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47228
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47426
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47469
Summary: Check whether arrayfunc_assign_needs_temporary misses
TBP/PPC attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
Summary: Less-optimized Code Size when using Optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47206
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47206
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47041
--- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
09:57:33 UTC ---
*** Bug 47206 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47237
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47339
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-01-26
10:17:18 UTC ---
gcc-3.3.2 is ancient and no longer supported upstream. Please try gcc-4.4.5 or
newer. Also you haven't told us which target you're compiling for, or how
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40979
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-01-26
10:23:12 UTC ---
This pr is not fixed at revision 169261 (gfc). AFAIU -ftree-loop-linear is now
implemented through graphite. This leads to a sort of regression with
++;
}
int main (void) { f (1); return 0; }
---
gcc -o 1 1.c -Wall -g
FAIL gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20110126 (experimental)
FAIL gcc-4.6.0-0.3.fc15.x86_64
PASS gcc (GCC) 4.5.3 20110124 (prerelease)
PASS gcc-4.5.1-4.fc14.x86_64
GNU gdb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47472
Summary: Rules printed by -M option contains duplicate slash
when -J option is used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47455
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
10:36:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 23130
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23130
Draft patch, working but failing due to another related bug
(In reply to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44392
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47472
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Summary: Incorrect computation with complex numbers when using
-std=c99
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47423
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
11:39:21 UTC ---
Ah. gcc/ada/targext.c fails to include config.h.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #2 from Tomer Levi Tomer.Levi at nuvoton dot com 2011-01-26
11:43:36 UTC ---
Hi,
The attached assembly was produced on the following machine:
taln36-Amit1015 gcc -v
Reading specs from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-01-26
12:23:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Hi,
The attached assembly was produced on the following machine:
taln36-Amit1015 gcc -v
Reading specs from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #43 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26 12:39:04
UTC ---
Yep. With my patch the saner looking
new_person-service.education.person.ss = *ss;
statement is generated. It's possible that class containers actually
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #4 from Tomer Levi Tomer.Levi at nuvoton dot com 2011-01-26
12:47:14 UTC ---
The cross-gcc compiler i'm using is hooking the default GNU verbose message,
hence i can not tell how GCC was exactly configured.
As i alredy said, the issue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
12:50:57 UTC ---
Try -fno-loop-optimize (or -fno-loop-optimize2 if that is already available).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #6 from Tomer Levi Tomer.Levi at nuvoton dot com 2011-01-26
13:00:17 UTC ---
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
Actually, -fno-loop-optimize was the first thing i've tried when facing this
issue. However, the generated code is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47474
Summary: Wrong code with allocatable scalar, allocatable
components as function result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
--- Comment #7 from Tomer Levi Tomer.Levi at nuvoton dot com 2011-01-26
13:16:16 UTC ---
Hi,
I was able to test the behavior on GCC 3.4.5 (native):
Here, the -fno-loop-optimize (and -fno-loop-optimize2) generate an optimized
code as expected.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
13:21:46 UTC ---
Simplified testcase:
extern __thread int t;
void
foo (int a)
{
t = a;
}
Looking at it in detail, not sure if the bug isn't earlier.
Seems the expander
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47470
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47459
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.0
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47237
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40979
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-01-26
14:20:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
This pr is not fixed at revision 169261 (gfc). AFAIU -ftree-loop-linear is now
implemented through graphite. This leads to a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47237
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-26 14:26:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I've commited patch fixing the testcase. H.J., can you please confirm that the
LTO 32bit faiulres are gone for you?
Sure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46949
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43467
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46856
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-01-26
14:43:34 UTC ---
The loop in reload_combine_recognize_const_pattern contains this check:
/* If the add clobbers another hard reg in parallel, don't move
it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.korn.cygwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
14:46:40 UTC ---
Gold was updated to handle this well for binutils 2.11.1, so H.J.'s branch.
We still have issues with mainline GNU LD. Dave, what about getting this fixed
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46948
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: |[4.5 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
Summary: Static member function template of class variadic
template can't be called from the inside
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44469
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47474
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
15:04:53 UTC ---
Patch. The order was wrong; additionally, if there is an allocatable RESULT
variable, it seems to get zero initialized via sym-value or similarly. Thus
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-26 15:14:10
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 147281:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00255.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47473
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
15:19:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 23132
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23132
gcc46-pr47473.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652
Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42894
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
15:34:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 23133
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23133
gcc46-pr42894.patch
The varasm.c alternative (untested).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47476
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in
potential_constant_expression_1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47476
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #20 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-26 14:56:14
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/11 07:51, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
Mikael
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
Summary: [4.6 regression] Sub-optimal mov at end of method
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47476
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
16:43:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 23134
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23134
gcc46-pr47476.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47459
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-01-26 16:43:43
UTC ---
Joel, can you verify the fix for 46878 fixes his problem on the m68k. I'm
pretty sure it will, but an independent verification would be good.
Thanks,
Jeff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
16:47:53 UTC ---
Note that this is not related to variadic templates, this gives the same error
using no C++0x features:
templatetypename T, typename Ts
struct test;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47475
--- Comment #3 from flo.goujeon at orange dot fr 2011-01-26 16:54:18 UTC ---
Oh, so that is the purpose of the 'template' keyword in nested-name-specifier.
That's tricky.
Thank you Jonathan, and sorry about this invalid report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47474
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
16:58:28 UTC ---
Submitted patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00235.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46856
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47472
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26
17:17:04 UTC ---
Draft patch completely untested (not even compiled):
--- a/gcc/fortran/options.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/options.c
@@ -463,9 +463,10 @@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
Summary: internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
Summary: make -j 12 RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board 'unix{-m32,}'
isn't parallelized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47478
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Leaver-Fay aleaverfay at gmail dot com 2011-01-26
17:30:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 23135
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23135
-save-temps file (.ii) that produces this crash (too big to upload
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42502
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46997
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-26 17:50:05
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Wed Jan 26 17:49:56 2011
New Revision: 169296
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169296
Log:
2011-01-26 Steve Ellcey
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47479
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-26 17:51:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Just use RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m32,\}'
which is parallelized.
Is there a way to paralelize --target_board 'unix{-m32,}'?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43467
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47270
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47480
Summary: GCC driver names a resolution file after the last
argument to the linker
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
