On 02/13/2012 08:00 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
GNU Linux is quite good, but has issues with the pow function for
large exponents, even in current versions
Really? Even on 64-bit? I know this is a problem for the 32-bit
legacy architecture, but I thought the 64-bit pow() was OK.
Andrew.
Hello,
the default ARM EABI configuration uses short enums by default (from
gcc/config/arm/arm.c:
/* AAPCS based ABIs use short enums by default. */
static bool
arm_default_short_enums (void)
{
return TARGET_AAPCS_BASED arm_abi != ARM_ABI_AAPCS_LINUX;
}
This causes a major headache for
On 2012-02-13 15:00:54 -0500, Geert Bosch wrote:
Properties:
[ ] Conforms to C99 for exceptional values
(accepting/producing NaNs, infinities)
[ ] Handles non-default rounding modes,
trapping math, errno, etc.
[ ] Requires IEEE compliant binary64 arithmetic
On 2012-02-14 09:51:28 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/13/2012 08:00 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
GNU Linux is quite good, but has issues with the pow function for
large exponents, even in current versions
Really? Even on 64-bit? I know this is a problem for the 32-bit
legacy architecture,
On 02/14/2012 04:51 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/13/2012 08:00 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
GNU Linux is quite good, but has issues with the pow function for
large exponents, even in current versions
Really? Even on 64-bit? I know this is a problem for the 32-bit
legacy architecture, but I
On 2012-02-14 14:26:05 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-02-14 09:51:28 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/13/2012 08:00 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
GNU Linux is quite good, but has issues with the pow function for
large exponents, even in current versions
Really? Even on 64-bit? I
On 02/14/2012 08:26 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-02-14 09:51:28 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/13/2012 08:00 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
GNU Linux is quite good, but has issues with the pow function for
large exponents, even in current versions
Really? Even on 64-bit? I know this is a
Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de writes:
the default ARM EABI configuration uses short enums by default (from
gcc/config/arm/arm.c:
/* AAPCS based ABIs use short enums by default. */
static bool
arm_default_short_enums (void)
{
return TARGET_AAPCS_BASED arm_abi !=
On 02/14/2012 04:05 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Sebastian Hubersebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de writes:
the default ARM EABI configuration uses short enums by default (from
gcc/config/arm/arm.c:
/* AAPCS based ABIs use short enums by default. */
static bool
arm_default_short_enums (void)
On Feb 14, 2012, at 08:22, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Please do not use the term binary80, as it is confusing (and
there is a difference between this format and the formats of
the IEEE binary{k} class concerning the implicit bit).
Yes, I first wrote extended precision, though that really is
a
On 02/14/2012 04:41 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
Right now we don't have a library either that conforms to C99
Are you sure? As far as I know we do. We might not meet
C99 Annex F, but that's not required.
and meets the far more relaxed accuracy criteria of OpenCL and
Ada.
Andrew.
On Feb 14, 2012, at 11:44, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/14/2012 04:41 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
Right now we don't have a library either that conforms to C99
Are you sure? As far as I know we do. We might not meet
C99 Annex F, but that's not required.
and meets the far more relaxed accuracy
On 02/14/2012 04:54 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
On Feb 14, 2012, at 11:44, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/14/2012 04:41 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
Right now we don't have a library either that conforms to C99
Are you sure? As far as I know we do. We might not meet
C99 Annex F, but that's not
Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de writes:
On 02/14/2012 04:05 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Sebastian Hubersebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de writes:
the default ARM EABI configuration uses short enums by default (from
gcc/config/arm/arm.c:
/* AAPCS based ABIs use short
spill_failure does return for asms since we don't want to ICE on bad
user code. That's all that's going on here.
ahh, thanks.
It sounds like ifcvt needs to be fixed. Your example:
block 44:
set cc = x;
set cc = y; (*)
if cc jump;
looks like an invalid transformation, but I suspect rather
On Feb 13, 2012, at 09:59, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-02-09 15:49:37 +, Andrew Haley wrote:
I'd start with INRIA's crlibm.
I point I'd like to correct. GNU MPFR has mainly ( 95%) been
developed by researchers and engineers paid by INRIA. But this
is not the case of CRlibm. I don't
Hello,
first of all, let me apologize for my late answer to this very exciting
email thread.
As pointed out several times, the current libm suffers from several
disadvantages:
* The current libm code is a mix of codes coming from different sources,
with tables generated by different
On 02/14/2012 06:54 PM, Christoph Lauter wrote:
My colleagues Jean-Michel Muller, Florent de Dinechin at École Normale
Supérieure de Lyon/ INRIA/ CNRS and myself at Université Pierre et Marie
Curie, Paris Sorbonne, we have been thinking of starting such a project
for quite a while. We've
Hi,
I was trying to compile gcc-4.7 snapshots on Debian GNU/Linux wheezy
(testing/unstable) i386, and found problem releated to multiarch.
This is my configure and compile script:
unset LC_ALL
unset LANG
export TEMP=/scratch/baryluk/gcc/tmp
export TMP=/scratch/baryluk/gcc/tmp
export
On 14 February 2012 22:26, Witold Baryluk wrote:
I was trying to compile gcc-4.7 snapshots on Debian GNU/Linux wheezy
(testing/unstable) i386, and found problem releated to multiarch.
This is a known issue with Debian that has been discussed several
times on the gcc and gcc-help lists, most
Snapshot gcc-4.4-20120214 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20120214/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:35:16PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 14 February 2012 22:26, Witold Baryluk wrote:
I was trying to compile gcc-4.7 snapshots on Debian GNU/Linux wheezy
(testing/unstable) i386, and found problem releated to multiarch.
This is a known issue with Debian that
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012, Geert Bosch wrote:
However, the glibc math library comes very close, and we can
surely fix any remaining issues there may be. So, if we can
use that as base, or as fallback library, we suddenly
achieve some minimal accuracy guarantees across a wide
range of platforms. If
Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl writes:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:35:16PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 14 February 2012 22:26, Witold Baryluk wrote:
I was trying to compile gcc-4.7 snapshots on Debian GNU/Linux wheezy
(testing/unstable) i386, and found problem releated to
On 02-14 17:34, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl writes:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:35:16PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 14 February 2012 22:26, Witold Baryluk wrote:
I was trying to compile gcc-4.7 snapshots on Debian GNU/Linux wheezy
On 02/14/2012 06:51 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Sebastian Hubersebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de writes:
On 02/14/2012 04:05 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Sebastian Hubersebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de writes:
the default ARM EABI configuration uses short enums by default (from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52241
Bug #: 52241
Summary: Performance degradation of 447.dealII on corei7 at
spec2006_base32.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
Bug #: 52242
Summary: [4.7 regression] libgomp.c/atomic-2.c failure on s390x
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39055
--- Comment #20 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
08:39:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 14 08:39:51 2012
New Revision: 184199
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184199
Log:
PR c++/39055
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #22 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
08:39:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 14 08:39:55 2012
New Revision: 184200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184200
Log:
2012-02-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39055
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-02-14 09:02:58 UTC ---
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52210
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
09:16:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 09:16:01 2012
New Revision: 184201
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184201
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52181
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52243
Bug #: 52243
Summary: Avoid reallocation for: array1 = array1 / scalar for
performance
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52210
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Bug #: 52244
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code for function
returning union between int and _Bool at O 2, with
no-early-inlining
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-darwin9 |powerpc-*-darwin9,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-darwin9, |*-*-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52245
Bug #: 52245
Summary: translatable string: Fortran F2003
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
12:10:10 UTC ---
The issue is that SRA thinks
u.b = 1;
is
access { base = (1716)'u', offset = 0, size = 8, expr = u.b, type = _Bool, ...
note 'size = 8'. That is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52238
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52237
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-02-14
12:36:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 26658
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26658
Draft
This is a slightly tweaked and extended version of the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #63 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
13:01:09 UTC ---
With a (seemingly) unrelated patch (attached to PR52097) I'm back on ICEing
for the gfortran.dg/lto/pr45586*.f90 testcases ...
Even before the adjusted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52246
Bug #: 52246
Summary: translatable string typo: plural use (one
translatable objects)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52208
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #64 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
13:20:37 UTC ---
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-types.c (revision 184203)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
13:23:15 UTC ---
It works apart from introducing
FAIL: gfortran.dg/lto/pr45586-2 f_lto_pr45586-2_0.o-f_lto_pr45586-2_0.o link,
-O
0 -flto -flto-partition=none
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
13:25:10 UTC ---
Index: gcc/tree-sra.c
===
--- gcc/tree-sra.c (revision 184203)
+++ gcc/tree-sra.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52208
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
13:58:44 UTC ---
The -1000 costs comes from the scan_one_insn subtracting there
ira_memory_move_cost[][][] * frequency (i.e. memory_cost becomes -4000) and
on the plus we add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
14:27:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Thanks Manuel. Thus, I'm going to test your patch. Was wondering, maybe we
want
the nit: 'n_total template_backtrace_limit +
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-02-14
14:44:03 UTC ---
Agreed about the testcase, of course.
By the way, for the actual dejagnu testcase, a few weeks ago I noticed that
apparently testing for 'note:' is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52214
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52247
Bug #: 52247
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with asm goto
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
15:15:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 26659
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26659
proposed patch
Actually Richard (rth), the restriction is less strict than
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
Bug 51528 depends on bug 52244, which changed state.
Bug 52244 Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] wrong code for function returning
union between int and _Bool at O 2, with no-early-inlining
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52244
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
15:34:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 14 15:33:56 2012
New Revision: 184214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184214
Log:
2012-02-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
15:34:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 14 15:33:56 2012
New Revision: 184214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184214
Log:
2012-02-14 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52247
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52247
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
15:48:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 26660
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26660
gcc47-pr52247.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52248
Bug #: 52248
Summary: [4.7 Regression] timevar ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
16:26:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
By the way, for the actual dejagnu testcase, a few weeks ago I noticed that
apparently testing for 'note:' is pretty weak,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-02-14
16:45:20 UTC ---
Any number of notes will be matched by a single note: test, since the
testsuite does not detect duplicates. There is PR about this somewhere.
I'm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #11 from Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell at gmail dot com 2012-02-14
17:15:23 UTC ---
Still crashing in, r184217.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52181
--- Comment #5 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
17:22:23 UTC ---
Thanks for the quick fix! Are you planning to backport to 4.6 as well?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
17:50:02 UTC ---
The patch in #c4 looks good.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52249
Bug #: 52249
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48501
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
18:02:23 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 14 18:02:09 2012
New Revision: 184218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184218
Log:
PR go/48501
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48501
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
18:04:38 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 14 18:04:28 2012
New Revision: 184219
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184219
Log:
PR go/48501
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48501
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52172
--- Comment #13 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2012-02-14
18:08:03 UTC ---
yes, I confirm, fixed on FreeBSD 9.9-CURRENT #11 r231193M
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48411
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52218
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-14 18:31:28 UTC ---
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2012-02-12
06:04:42 UTC ---
In current mainline I'm not aware of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Bug #: 52250
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in sel_remove_bb, at
sel-sched-ir.c:5213 with -fsel-sched-pipelining
-fsel-sched-pipelining-outer-loops
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-14 18:39:32 UTC ---
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2012-02-12
19:52:02 UTC ---
The patch fixes the test case and also
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48411
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48411
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
18:58:52 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 14 18:58:48 2012
New Revision: 184221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184221
Log:
PR go/48411
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48411
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
19:40:23 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Feb 14 19:40:13 2012
New Revision: 184225
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184225
Log:
2012-02-14 Bill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48410
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51950
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
19:40:18 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 14 19:40:10 2012
New Revision: 184224
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184224
Log:
PR debug/51950
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50969
--- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-14
19:40:22 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Feb 14 19:40:13 2012
New Revision: 184225
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184225
Log:
2012-02-14 Bill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48243
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48122
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
