gcc-4.7-20120225 is now available

2012-02-25 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.7-20120225 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7-20120225/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.7 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk

Re: Bootstrapping and C++ compiler

2012-02-25 Thread Marc Glisse
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: Now that we build the C-family compilers with a C++ compiler by default, is the changed documented anywhere? I looked at the "installation" part of the manual but I could not find anything there. I looked at the wiki page, but many things there seem

Re: optimization report

2012-02-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 25 February 2012 19:06, Mahmood Naderan wrote: > > Does GCC report on optimizations? I mean, using -O3, it is good to see which > part of code was the hardest part in optimization process. Or a report that > shows which part of code used largest memory. Have you looked at -fmem-report and -ft

optimization report

2012-02-25 Thread Mahmood Naderan
Hi Does GCC report on optimizations? I mean, using -O3, it is good to see which part of code was the hardest part in optimization process. Or a report that shows which part of code used largest memory.   // Naderan *Mahmood;

Bootstrapping and C++ compiler

2012-02-25 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Hi, Now that we build the C-family compilers with a C++ compiler by default, is the changed documented anywhere? I looked at the "installation" part of the manual but I could not find anything there. I looked at the wiki page, but many things there seem not to be updated. Where should I have lo

Re: PATCH: PR boehm-gc/48299: FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

2012-02-25 Thread Jack Howarth
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:35:05PM -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote: > On 02/23/2012 09:34 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:14:17PM -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote: >>> On 02/23/2012 02:04 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote: Hello, As I see in my x86_64/linux gcc build and for e