Hello. A couple years ago I got really excited about the gcc "split stacks"
feature that was being developed, and I recently noticed that it is ready to
use now. I thereby have been spending the last few days trying it with one of
my side-projects (currently just a toy, but something I hope to h
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of
> William J. Schmidt
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 11:32 PM
> To: Jiangning Liu
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; wschm...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: A question about redundant PHI expression stmt
>
>
Sorry for being late to the party.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Ouch, I did not know that the EABI left this open. That seems like a
> bug, because it prevents code from being interoperable. This is
> precisely the kind of thing an ABI should address. Does anybody
The core development team is very pleased to announce the availability
of PPL 0.12, a new release of the Parma Polyhedra Library.
This release includes portability improvements, a few bug fixes, and
performance improvements for the MIP and PIP solvers. and PIP
solvers. Configurability has also
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 16:07 +0800, Jiangning Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the small case below, there are some redundant PHI expression stmt
> generated, and finally cause back-end generates redundant copy instructions
> due to some reasons around IRA.
>
> int *l, *r, *g;
> void test_func(int n)
> {
Status
==
The trunk is still in regression and documentation fixes only state
(so-called stage4).
We have reached a point where it is sufficiently stable for a first
release candidate. If there appear no serious release blockers in
the next few days expect a release candidate this week. As
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:48:35AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> OK, I will revert the patch immediatelly, under assumption that your
> mail grants RM approval for 4.6 branch.
Yes, the reversion is fine.
Jakub
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
Well, at least with my cross it does.
this change, or something like it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45
introduces a reference to TS_TYPED into t
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>>> Well, at least with my cross it does.
>>>
>>> this change, or something like it:
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
>> Well, at least with my cross it does.
>>
>> this change, or something like it:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45
>>
>> introduces a reference to TS_TYPED into the 4.6 branch f
Thanks for the prompt and indeed helpful hint.
I'll comment the offending line out locally for now.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Peter Garbett
> wrote:
>> Well, at least with my cross it does.
>>
>> this change, or something like
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Peter Garbett
wrote:
> Well, at least with my cross it does.
>
> this change, or something like it:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45
>
> introduces a reference to TS_TYPED into the 4.6 branch for
> fold-
Well, at least with my cross it does.
this change, or something like it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45
introduces a reference to TS_TYPED into the 4.6 branch for
fold-const.c, and it isnt defined,
or at least neither I nor my compiler c
13 matches
Mail list logo
