On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/03/2012 02:58 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Ralf Corsepius
ralf.corsep...@rtems.org wrote:
On 03/02/2012 02:44 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
On 03/05/2012 10:12 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/03/2012 02:58 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Ralf Corsepius
ralf.corsep...@rtems.org wrote:
On 03/02/2012 02:44 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
GCC 4.7.0 Release
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Arnaldo arnaldo.c...@upr.edu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Tobias Grosser tob...@grosser.es wrote:
On 02/17/2012 08:34 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 19:17 -0400, Arnaldo wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm working on an extension to the
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Arnaldo arnaldo.c...@upr.edu wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Arnaldo arnaldo.c...@upr.edu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Tobias Grosser tob...@grosser.es wrote:
On 02/17/2012 08:34 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 19:17 -0400,
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Arnaldo wrote:
I couldn't get cfgexpand.c:basic_block expand_gimple_basic_block
(basic_block bb) to work by calling it directly because there is some
preprocessing in gimple_expand_cfg() that has to be done first. But
calling gimple_expand_cfg() modifies the CFG
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Arnaldo wrote:
I couldn't get cfgexpand.c:basic_block expand_gimple_basic_block
(basic_block bb) to work by calling it directly because there is some
preprocessing in gimple_expand_cfg() that has to be
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Arnaldo arnaldo.c...@upr.edu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Arnaldo wrote:
I couldn't get cfgexpand.c:basic_block expand_gimple_basic_block
(basic_block bb) to work by calling it directly
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Arnaldo arnaldo.c...@upr.edu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Arnaldo wrote:
I couldn't get cfgexpand.c:basic_block expand_gimple_basic_block
(basic_block bb) to work by calling it directly
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 AM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Arnaldo arnaldo.c...@upr.edu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Arnaldo wrote:
I couldn't get cfgexpand.c:basic_block
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Arnaldo arnaldo.c...@upr.edu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:17 AM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Arnaldo arnaldo.c...@upr.edu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Mar
I'm enhancing the out-of-tree msp430 back end to support the 20-bit
extended registers of the 430X CPU. I'd like to do this using a
native type rather than special-casing its use in addresses. It seems
the best approach is to use PSImode, since the values are 20 bits when
in a register, and 32
On 03/05/2012 05:24 PM, Peter Bigot wrote:
And is there any reason (other than it doesn't seem to have been done
before) to believe PSImode is the wrong way to support a
general-purpose 20-bit integral type in gcc?
If you're using 4.7.0, it should be possible to use FRACTIONAL_INT_MODE
and get
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 03/05/2012 05:24 PM, Peter Bigot wrote:
And is there any reason (other than it doesn't seem to have been done
before) to believe PSImode is the wrong way to support a
general-purpose 20-bit integral type in gcc?
On 03/05/12 09:01, Rainer Orth wrote:
This is where I need explicit approval and/or guidance:
* There are some fixincludes hacks that from their names seem to be
osf-specific, but are not restricted to alpha*-dec-osf*. Bruce,
what's the best way to handle those? Disable them e.g. with a
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 03/05/2012 05:24 PM, Peter Bigot wrote:
And is there any reason (other than it doesn't seem to have been done
before) to believe PSImode is the wrong way to support a
general-purpose 20-bit integral type in gcc?
If you're using 4.7.0, it should be possible to use
Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org writes:
On 03/05/12 09:01, Rainer Orth wrote:
This is where I need explicit approval and/or guidance:
* There are some fixincludes hacks that from their names seem to be
osf-specific, but are not restricted to alpha*-dec-osf*. Bruce,
what's the best way to
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
GCC 4.7.0 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org
The first release candidate for GCC 4.7.0 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.7.0-RC-20120302
and shortly its mirrors. It has been
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52469
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52485
--- Comment #2 from Václav Šmilauer eu at doxos dot eu 2012-03-05 08:55:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I think we should not have an option to disable user-defined literals at all.
Since their code is not C++11, they should fix their code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52485
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52342
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52450
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-05 09:19:12 UTC ---
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52450
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52485
--- Comment #4 from Václav Šmilauer eu at doxos dot eu 2012-03-05 09:20:26
UTC ---
I think you understood my source _is_ c++11, but the libs I have to use are
not; therefore I have to compile with -std=c++11. The the fix is admittedly
trivial and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52487
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52478
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
10:20:37 UTC ---
I think it's undefined what you relied upon.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||32630
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52472
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52472
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
10:32:26 UTC ---
I thought about setting POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED but am unsure about other side
effects of that define.
Presumably, POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED is undefined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52470
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52467
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52478
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52470
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52467
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
11:14:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
or any such variant is a compiler defect.
It's a GNU extension and is rejected with -pedantic-errors (and compiles
without ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52489
Bug #: 52489
Summary: LTO drops init_array/fini_array sections
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52489
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52478
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51721
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
12:28:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 5 12:27:55 2012
New Revision: 184927
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184927
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52489
--- Comment #2 from Krisztian Kocsis krisztian.kocsis at optimaster dot eu
2012-03-05 12:46:47 UTC ---
It seems that it works with -fno-use-linker-plugin - strane :S
Now I will try to check some other things.
I think it is not a linker bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52430
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
12:50:33 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Mar 5 12:50:29 2012
New Revision: 184928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184928
Log:
2012-03-05 Martin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52353
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
13:08:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 5 13:08:55 2012
New Revision: 184932
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184932
Log:
2012-03-05 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52353
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52490
Bug #: 52490
Summary: RTL DCE removes trapping const libcalls
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52491
Bug #: 52491
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52402.c at -O2 and above
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52491
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52489
--- Comment #3 from Krisztian Kocsis krisztian.kocsis at optimaster dot eu
2012-03-05 13:35:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 26832
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26832
Generated files with -fuse-linker-plugin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52489
--- Comment #4 from Krisztian Kocsis krisztian.kocsis at optimaster dot eu
2012-03-05 13:39:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 26833
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26833
Generated files with -fno-use-linker-plugin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52489
--- Comment #5 from Krisztian Kocsis krisztian.kocsis at optimaster dot eu
2012-03-05 13:40:18 UTC ---
Ok, I can confirm that it work if plugins are disabled or
-fno-use-linker-plugin is used. When linker plugin is used gcc drops these
sections.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52489
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52489
--- Comment #7 from Krisztian Kocsis krisztian.kocsis at optimaster dot eu
2012-03-05 13:50:25 UTC ---
Binutils 2.22
Pls check the attached files.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52472
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
14:05:36 UTC ---
I tried
#define POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED 1
but this runs into ICE some lines later in cfgexpand.c:2496
mode = PSI
as = 0
x = symbol_ref:PSI (data)
Of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52492
Bug #: 52492
Summary: -ftree-vectorize optimization bug
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52467
--- Comment #4 from Martin Griffin mg200 at uni dot brighton.ac.uk 2012-03-05
14:14:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
Can you clarify the target and command-line options you use?
And exact version, i.e. output of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52492
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52492
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51417
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
15:12:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 26835
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26835
Fix installation of gcc-{ar,nm,ranlib)
The approach this patch is based
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52492
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51417
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
15:22:46 UTC ---
Please post the patch to gcc-patches and say how you tested it. I'll ack it
for the 4.7 branch then.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52342
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2012-03-05 15:38:36
UTC ---
Don't worry, I will fix that one too, although it's odd that I don't see it
myself.
It's fairly important that gcc 4.7 support the Go 1 release, and that is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52342
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
15:41:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Don't worry, I will fix that one too, although it's odd that I don't see it
myself.
It's fairly important that gcc 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51417
Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||corsepiu at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52430
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52452
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52481
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32120
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Berlin dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
17:20:36 UTC ---
I still have an unfinished patch to convert SCCVN to
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=512536
This actually makes it significantly easier to integrate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51527
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
17:31:49 UTC ---
Here is a smaller test case:
__int24 add3 (__int24 a)
{
return a + 0x1;
}
It works if
-- the constant is cast with (__int24) 0x1
-- the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32120
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
--- Comment #21 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
18:09:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 5 18:08:56 2012
New Revision: 184946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184946
Log:
PR c++/51930
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52481
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
18:37:29 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Mar 5 18:37:19 2012
New Revision: 184948
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184948
Log:
PR target/52481
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52463
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
18:38:56 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Mar 5 18:38:47 2012
New Revision: 184949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184949
Log:
PR middle-end/52463
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51255
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52489
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52463
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52481
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
18:42:08 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Mar 5 18:41:56 2012
New Revision: 184950
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184950
Log:
PR target/52481
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52481
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52481
--- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
18:57:40 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Mar 5 18:57:36 2012
New Revision: 184952
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184952
Log:
PR target/52481
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
19:52:19 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Mar 5 19:52:08 2012
New Revision: 184955
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184955
Log:
PR tree-opt/52242
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
19:54:02 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Mar 5 19:53:54 2012
New Revision: 184956
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184956
Log:
PR tree-opt/52242
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52242
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52493
Bug #: 52493
Summary: tree check fail in ptr_derefs_may_alias_p
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51902
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-05
20:17:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 5 20:17:44 2012
New Revision: 184958
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184958
Log:
PR debug/51902
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52469
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52494
Bug #: 52494
Summary: s-taprop-dummy.adb does not define subpackage Specific
used in s-tpoaal.sdb
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #2 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2012-03-05
21:02:27 UTC ---
I tried overriding as to point to odcctools-20090808's version:
% odas -v
Apple Inc version odcctools-698.1od9, GNU assembler version 1.38
and that worked
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52495
Bug #: 52495
Summary: rs6000.c fails to (cross-) build: implicit
declaration of function ‘ASM_WEAKEN_DECL’
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49862
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|bfin-elf, bfin-rtems,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50513
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46738
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.0,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47096
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52496
Bug #: 52496
Summary: avr-specific built-ins missing memory barrier
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52496
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47100
--- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-05 22:32:22 UTC ---
Problem is still present in revision 184927.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48899
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52497
Bug #: 52497
Summary: libffi doesn't build on powerpc64-linux after latest
upstream merge
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49403
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52498
Bug #: 52498
Summary: vmsdbgout.c fails to build with --enable-werror-always
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52497
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52499
Bug #: 52499
Summary: avr MODE_CODE_BASE_REG_CLASS enum conversion problem
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
