On Thu, 24 May 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> The document is at:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/pph?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=pph-in-gcc.pdf
One thing I wonder from this document is whether there are changes it
would be useful to make to system headers (both in GCC and in glibc) to
improve mod
On 05/25/2012 11:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
and it should be possible to eliminate the __need_* special cases
for some system headers by having more, smaller headers set up to define
individual types.
I was thinking the same thing.
Jason
On 12-05-25 12:25 , Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/25/2012 11:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
and it should be possible to eliminate the __need_* special cases
for some system headers by having more, smaller headers set up to define
individual types.
I was thinking the same thing.
Yes. Increased
When --with-sysroot is used to configure gcc, build will usually fail
if --with-build-sysroot isn't set. Should --with-build-sysroot be set to
the same value as --with-sysroot by default if --with-sysroot is used?
--
H.J.
Under what conditions does it fail? We use it daily at mingw-w64.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:33 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> When --with-sysroot is used to configure gcc, build will usually fail
> if --with-build-sysroot isn't set. Should --with-build-sysroot be set to
> the same value as --with-sysro
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:36 AM, NightStrike wrote:
> Under what conditions does it fail? We use it daily at mingw-w64.
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:33 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> When --with-sysroot is used to configure gcc, build will usually fail
>> if --with-build-sysroot isn't set. Should --
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12-05-25 12:25 , Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 05/25/2012 11:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > and it should be possible to eliminate the __need_* special cases
> > > for some system headers by having more, smaller headers set up to define
> > > indiv
On 12-05-25 14:54 , Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 12-05-25 12:25 , Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/25/2012 11:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
and it should be possible to eliminate the __need_* special cases
for some system headers by having more, smaller header
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:40 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:36 AM, NightStrike wrote:
>> Under what conditions does it fail? We use it daily at mingw-w64.
>>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:33 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> When --with-sysroot is used to configure gcc, build will usually
Hi,
Just to let people know I have succeeded in building gcc-4.7.0 with
--enable-build-with-cxx (All stages built as C++) on latest Cygwin
with GCC 4.5.3 and on MinGW32 with a rebuilt GCC 4.6.2 as the GCC
4.6.2 that came with MinGW was missing stdarg.h and stddef.h and
possibly other headers.
Man
On 5/25/12, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12-05-25 14:54 , Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > > On 12-05-25 12:25 , Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 05/25/2012 11:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > > > and it should be possible to eliminate the __need_*
> > > > >
On 25 May 2012 21:26, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> - Some files give syntax errors when compiled in isolation because they are
> missing symbols. for example, ext/algorithm needs __gnu_cxx::is_sorted.
I'm not sure what this refers to ( either defines
__gnu_cxx::is_sorted or has a using declaration for
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20120525 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20120525/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:13 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> It was a pilot error.
Happens to the best of us :)
If I apply this patch, which checks for duplicate hard registers within
-fira-share-save-slots, the following *-elf targets fail due to the assert:
bfin cris m32c rl78 rx sh sh64 v850
The following succeed:
frv h8300 i386 ia64 m32r mep mipsisa32 mipsisa64 mn10300 powerpc tx39
W
On 5/25/12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 25 May 2012 21:26, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > - Some files give syntax errors when compiled in isolation
> > because they are missing symbols. for example, ext/algorithm
> > needs __gnu_cxx::is_sorted.
>
> I'm not sure what this refers to ( either
> defines __
16 matches
Mail list logo