Hello everybody.
I've already written that to the gcc-help list but there was no answer.
I want to use the "ifunc" Attribute within my GCC plugin. The code should
look like:
typedef void (bar_fn_t)(uint32_t *);
bar_fn_t bar __attribute__((ifunc("resolve_bar")));
I think I know how to build and
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20120727 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20120727/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:10 PM, LiLy wrote:
>
> I have two existing shared libraries liba.so, libb.so.
> Liba.so depends on libb.so(liba.so is dynamically linked with libb.so
> ). Now I want to compile an application which uses both liba.so and
> libb.so.
Please never send e-mail to both gcc
Hi All,
I have two existing shared libraries liba.so, libb.so.
Liba.so depends on libb.so(liba.so is dynamically linked with libb.so
). Now I want to compile an application which uses both liba.so and
libb.so.
1. On Linux, following command can pass
gcc -Wall -o app app.c -L.. -la
I think I am ok without it. I did find a workaround.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Botcazou [mailto:ebotca...@adacore.com]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 10:26 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: build6_stat removed?
> I have a question re
> I have a question regarding build6_stat. I saw that in 7/25 merge,
> someone removed this function. Why was it removed?
Because it has been unused for a while, as TARGET_MEM_REF has 5 operands now.
> I am currently using it in my Cilk Plus branch. What is a work around
>
> The documentation for this comes under the " Passing Function Arguments on
> the Stack" section, which says:
>
> "This target hook returns true if an argument declared in a prototype as an
> integral type smaller than int should actually be passed as an int. In
> addition to avoiding errors in c
Hi Jon,
I'd like to try to optimise double word left shifts of sign/zero
extended
operands if a widening multiply instruction is available. For the
following
code:
long long f(long a, long b)
{
return (long long)a << b;
}
I'd like to optimise this to something like:
(long long) a * (
Since 4.7 register_tm_clones and deregister_tm_clones are added in
crtbegin.o. Built for ARM they eat 80 precious bytes of flash for each
application. They seem to be for transaction memory only and my build
doesn't need it.
I can simple disable them by -DUSE_TM_CLONE_REGISTERY=0 in a tmake_file.
