On 08/29/2012 09:22 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
It uses the GCC unwind interface to collect a stack trace, and parses
DWARF debug info to get file/line/function information. (Of course it's
silly to write yet another DWARF reader, but I didn't find an existing
reader that seemed wholly
On 08/29/2012 08:40 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 08/29/2012 06:21 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
The DWARF reader calls malloc and is therefore not async-signal safe.
It also is a problem if the crash in the program is due to overwriting
the malloc heap administration (which easily occurs in
Hi,
I am having issues trying to install GCC (3.0.4) on SCO 5.0.7 i386.
I downloaded gcc-3.0.4.tar.gz from http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-3.0.4/;, I
then tried untarring the file, by: `gzip -dc gcc-3.0.4.tar.gz | tar xAvf -
file-list 21`
And that showed me a bunch of files, but no VOLS so I
Hi.
The cxx-conversion idea does not come without its
cons. The most important for us is that there will
not be a plain gcc-core package that is smaller,
builds faster a plain C compiler with a smaller
binary and is able to bootstrap future versions
of a plain C compiler made of the latest vesion
On 08/30/2012 01:43 PM, Nikos Fotoulis wrote:
The cxx-conversion idea does not come without its cons. The most
important for us is that there will not be a plain gcc-core package
that is smaller, builds faster a plain C compiler with a smaller
binary and is able to bootstrap future versions
On 30 August 2012 13:43, Nikos Fotoulis wrote:
Hi.
The cxx-conversion idea does not come without its
cons. The most important for us is that there will
not be a plain gcc-core package that is smaller,
The GCC project doesn't make gcc-core tarballs any more anyway.
Third-party packagers are
Hello,
I'm not sure about such errors should be reported, but I will try.
Host compiler: gcc-4.7.1-MinGW-x86_64
x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -c -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
-momit-leaf-frame-pointer -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -W
-Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual
On 08/27/2012 11:58 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
I wonder if the second discriminator support is easily generalizable
to enabling any derived class being a root class on it own with its
own subtree? If I understand correctly, the GTY syntax would be the
same.
If I understand correctly, you
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/27/2012 11:58 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
I wonder if the second discriminator support is easily generalizable
to enabling any derived class being a root class on it own with its
own subtree? If I understand
On 8/30/12, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/27/2012 11:58 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
I wonder if the second discriminator support is easily generalizable
to enabling any derived class being a root class on it own with its
own subtree? If I understand correctly, the GTY syntax
On 8/30/12, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Aug 30, 2012 Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/27/2012 11:58 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
I wonder if the second discriminator support is easily
generalizable to enabling any derived class being a root
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/29/2012 09:22 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
It uses the GCC unwind interface to collect a stack trace, and parses
DWARF debug info to get file/line/function information. (Of course it's
silly to write yet another
Dunno if alpha is going to be the only glibc port to encounter this, if it
should be considered a gcc bug, or what.
Without this patch, using mainline gcc, I get
./../include/libc-symbols.h:485:26: error: ‘__EI___isnanf’ aliased to external
symbol ‘__GI___isnanf’
extern __typeof (name)
On 8/29/12, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Aug 29, 2012 Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Does this seem like something we could usefully add to GCC?
Emphatically, yes!.
Seconded!
Does anybody see any big problems with it?
Can it would be a great addition
gcc-python-plugin is a plugin for GCC 4.6 onwards which embeds the
CPython interpreter within GCC, allowing you to write new compiler
warnings for C/C++ in Python, generate code visualizations, etc. It
comes with cpychecker: a tool for static analysis tool of CPython
extensions.
Tarball releases
Hello Everyone,
The Cilk-Plus branch is feature-complete. Programs using Cilk Plus
constructs get great performance on vector and multicore hardware. Programs
that don't use the new language features (enabled by a -fcilkplus flag) see no
change. For details please see
I've seen this today both for alpha and s390 cross from x86_64:
libtool: compile: /home/rth/work/gcc/bld-s390/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/home/rth/work/gcc/bld-s390/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/home/rth/work/gcc/bld-s390/s390x-linux/libstdc++-v3/src
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54397
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54397
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2012-08-30 06:17:48 UTC ---
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 06:07:00AM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54397
Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54397
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
07:01:12 UTC ---
You need GDB 7.5 (or the changes mentioned in the other PR backported).
It doesn't make any sense to XFAIL the test, all debugging of code compiled by
GCC 4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54392
--- Comment #14 from Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon
dot at 2012-08-30 07:33:16 UTC ---
Indeed, the old buffer is freed before being copied.
Yep, this isn't a regression. In fact, with 4.4.3 it was the /empty string/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
--- Comment #4 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2012-08-30 07:52:31
UTC ---
I'll post today.
I haven't yet looked up which mailing list you're even talking about.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413
Bug #: 54413
Summary: Option for turning off compiler extensions for
-std=c++11 with respect to complex/fixed-point numbers
missing
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
08:19:56 UTC ---
Send to both gcc-patches at gcc.gnu.org and libstdc++ at gcc.gnu.org.
I think it would be better to send both hunks separately, as the first hunk is
shorter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54414
Bug #: 54414
Summary: ARM:mis-compiled prologue/epilogue on cortex-m0 when
optimizing with -Os
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54415
Bug #: 54415
Summary: GCC 4.4.4 build fails on solaris sparc with error as
undefined reference to `_Qp_xtoq'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54416
Bug #: 54416
Summary: [4.8] ICE (segv) in codegen
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
09:56:44 UTC ---
This is just the usual submission process, documented at
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54416
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
10:03:51 UTC ---
Perhaps we should for i and r etc. suffixes in C++11+ first try to look it up
as user-defined-literal and only if there are no corresponding operators,
treat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54403
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||54367
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
10:17:08 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Aug 30 10:17:04 2012
New Revision: 190800
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190800
Log:
Fix PR target/54252
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54414
--- Comment #1 from amker.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com 2012-08-30
10:17:15 UTC ---
I suspect that the call of arm_size_return_regs in function
thumb1_extra_regs_pushed should also be covered as in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
10:21:59 UTC ---
Fixed now I believe on trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
10:42:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
On powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10, the test
30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc is timed out (from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54417
Bug #: 54417
Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: in edge_badness, at
ipa-inline.c:793
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54418
Bug #: 54418
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [SH] Invalid operands for opcode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-08-30
12:53:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Do you mean does *not* happen on darwin12?
Well, I don't have access to darwin11 nor 12, so the only thing I am sure of is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54418
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30 13:11:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
It seems that cmpgeusi_t insn_and_split doesn't do its work.
(define_insn_and_split cmpgeusi_t
[(set (reg:SI T_REG)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54365
--- Comment #5 from Greg Law g...@undo-software.com 2012-08-30 13:23:54 UTC
---
-fwrapv doesn't appear to make a difference:
$ gcc compilerbug.c
$ ./a.out
it wraps
$ gcc -O2 compilerbug.c
$ ./a.out
no wrap
$ gcc -O2 -fwrapv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54365
--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer fweimer at redhat dot com 2012-08-30
13:33:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
-fwrapv doesn't appear to make a difference:
$ gcc compilerbug.c
$ ./a.out
it wraps
$ gcc -O2 compilerbug.c
$ ./a.out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54365
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
13:45:13 UTC ---
This is not surprising, just use integer arithmetic instead of pointer
arithmetic. Pointer arithmetic not only has undefined wrapping, it is defined
only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54365
--- Comment #8 from Florian Weimer fweimer at redhat dot com 2012-08-30
13:56:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
This is not surprising, just use integer arithmetic instead of pointer
arithmetic. Pointer arithmetic not only has undefined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27346|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Bug #: 54419
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Compiling
libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on
x86_64-apple-darwin10
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #26 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-08-30 14:19:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
snipped
The sentence about newer versions is there for a reason. In fact, on
Tru64 UNIX the situation is even worse:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420
Bug #: 54420
Summary: Segmentation in decl_mangling_context
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54409
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54420
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #27 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-08-30 14:56:46 UTC ---
FWIW, I just filed the MFPR 3.1.x make check issue:
https://gforge.inria.fr/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=14806group_id=136atid=619
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50427
Catherine Gasnier lalhee at wanadoo dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lalhee at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50427
Catherine Gasnier lalhee at wanadoo dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lalhee at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54421
Bug #: 54421
Summary: Extra movdqa when accessing quadwords in a 128-bit SSE
register
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54394
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
15:32:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
You can try whether it fixes your regression too.
Yes, it does. Thanks.
Great, thanks.
Did you check if you get the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54388
--- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
15:36:18 UTC ---
BTW, we definitely need a comment on why this particular code is so tricky.
// NB: Interesting use of comma operator semantics.
at the very least...
;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54388
--- Comment #10 from Florian Weimer fweimer at redhat dot com 2012-08-30
15:39:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
BTW, we definitely need a comment on why this particular code is so tricky.
// NB: Interesting use of comma operator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #8 from Eric Batut eric.batut at allegorithmic dot com 2012-08-30
15:52:20 UTC ---
The original bug instance is fixed on trunk (rev 190803).
I had what I think is another instance of the same bug, where the error message
is alignment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
15:58:40 UTC ---
The aggregate functions and their use in inlining/ipa-cp heuristics is
in, at least with my PHI predicate computing patch which I
re-submitted today we even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54422
Bug #: 54422
Summary: Merge adjacent stores of elements of a vector (or
loads)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54423
Bug #: 54423
Summary: building trunk on Darwin 12.1 fails in building
libraries
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54407
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
16:40:48 UTC ---
I don't know of any workaround so disabling the test seems like a good option
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #9 from ramrad01 at arm dot com 2012-08-30 16:48:12 UTC ---
On 30/08/12 16:52, eric.batut at allegorithmic dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54252
--- Comment #8 from Eric Batut eric.batut at allegorithmic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54417
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54424
Bug #: 54424
Summary: Compiler crash with -std=gnu++0x
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54425
Bug #: 54425
Summary: Rvalue/Lvalue overload resolution of templated
function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #28 from Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net
2012-08-30 17:32:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
There are two curious things:
1. why does the 2nd stage drops to only about 600 byte. (I assume 20-30k is
normal).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54418
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48251
Hin-Tak Leung htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||htl10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54426
Bug #: 54426
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/common_6.f90 -O
(internal compiler error) on powerpc-apple-darwin9
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
--- Comment #13 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
19:25:03 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Aug 30 19:24:58 2012
New Revision: 190810
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190810
Log:
2012-08-30 Benjamin Kosnik
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50427
--- Comment #4 from Peter A. Bigot bigotp at acm dot org 2012-08-30 19:55:41
UTC ---
Thanks for the suggestion. At the time this bug was reported,
REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE was not used as the target supported only 16-bit
registers, so I don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427
Bug #: 54427
Summary: Expose more vector extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #2 from Ulrich Drepper drepper.fsp at gmail dot com 2012-08-30
20:19:35 UTC ---
The instruction is generated by the compiler. If you try to compile a new
compiler you have to make sure the tools used are recent enough to understand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54428
Bug #: 54428
Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7591
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-08-30
20:37:59 UTC ---
The instruction is generated by the compiler. If you try to compile a new
compiler you have to make sure the tools used are recent enough to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54422
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54425
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54418
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30 22:18:34
UTC ---
Unfortunately I was not able to reproduce this case without the -fopenmp
option, and that option requires threads, which are not available on the sh-sim
config
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54429
Bug #: 54429
Summary: [SH] SImode values get ferried through FPUL and FP
regs for -O0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #49 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-30
22:54:23 UTC ---
Kaz, if you have some time, could you please gather some CSiBE runtime numbers
for '-mpretend-cmove' and without it?
I've compared the result-size of the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54430
Bug #: 54430
Summary: [C++11] Range Based For Loop lhs scoping issue
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
On 29 Aug 2012, at 01:21, asharif at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398
Bug #: 54398
Summary: Incorrect ARM assembly when building with
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -O2
Classification:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrishnan at gmail dot
com 2012-08-30 23:32:42 UTC ---
On 29 Aug 2012, at 01:21, asharif at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54398
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54431
Bug #: 54431
Summary: [C++11] g++ crashes when compiling the following file
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #3 from chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu.org chaoyingfu at gcc dot
gnu.org 2012-08-31 00:38:39 UTC ---
The fall-through path of this jump has a barrier (resulted from
__builtin_unreachable), and the target of this jump has a return
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54432
Bug #: 54432
Summary: Memory leak when linking libobjc with gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54432
--- Comment #1 from Karl Kirch karlkrch at gmail dot com 2012-08-31 02:06:50
UTC ---
Another test case.
Looks like I end up with lost memory for every class I define.
#include objc/Object.h
@interface Test : Object
{}
@end
@implementation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54432
--- Comment #2 from Karl Kirch karlkrch at gmail dot com 2012-08-31 02:10:38
UTC ---
GCC info
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54432
--- Comment #3 from Karl Kirch karlkrch at gmail dot com 2012-08-31 02:11:48
UTC ---
GCC info
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54433
Bug #: 54433
Summary: bogus -Wmissing-format-attribute warnings when first
to check is wrong
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50545
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-31
02:50:33 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 31 02:50:28 2012
New Revision: 190830
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190830
Log:
PR c++/50545
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51222
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-31
02:50:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 31 02:50:28 2012
New Revision: 190830
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190830
Log:
PR c++/50545
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54428
Marek Polacek polacek at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||polacek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54428
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek polacek at redhat dot com 2012-08-31
05:46:07 UTC ---
Reduced. Note that the typedef is needed to trigger ICE.
typedef double _Complex fftw_complex;
extern fftw_complex *fftw_alloc_complex (int);
int
cf (int
On 29 August 2012 13:25, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
On 08/28/2012 08:12 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28 August 2012 18:27, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Does it actually produce a segfault? I suppose it might on some
platforms, but not all, so I'm not sure it's worth changing.
It does
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
