gcc-4.6-20120907 is now available

2012-09-07 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20120907 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20120907/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: Bug in bitfield handling?

2012-09-07 Thread Paul_Koning
On Sep 7, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:57 AM, wrote: >> This seems to be a bug: >> >> struct bug >> { >>int f1:1; >>unsigned long long f2:31; >> }; >> >> struct bug test = { 1, 0x8000ULL }; >> >> int main (int c, char **v) >> { >>unsigned lon

Re: Bug in bitfield handling?

2012-09-07 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:57 AM, wrote: > This seems to be a bug: > > struct bug > { > int f1:1; > unsigned long long f2:31; > }; > > struct bug test = { 1, 0x8000ULL }; > > int main (int c, char **v) > { > unsigned long long tf2; > > tf2 = test.f2 << 16; > if (tf2 == 0x80

Bug in bitfield handling?

2012-09-07 Thread Paul_Koning
This seems to be a bug: struct bug { int f1:1; unsigned long long f2:31; }; struct bug test = { 1, 0x8000ULL }; int main (int c, char **v) { unsigned long long tf2; tf2 = test.f2 << 16; if (tf2 == 0x8000ULL) return 0; return 1; } Since the underlying typ

gcc-c-api

2012-09-07 Thread David Malcolm
After a hiatus, I've restarted work on an API for GCC plugins - specifically, a C API (given that my plugin is written in C, I have more interest in that than a C++ API). BTW, how many other GCC plugins are written in C? It's still a work-in-progress, but can be seen here: http://git.fedorahoste

Re: Cgraph Modification Plan

2012-09-07 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Sorry to interrupt here, but please finish the existing partial C++ > transitions > instead of starting to work on new ones. Current stage1 will not last forever > (stage1 is usually 6 months, so its natural end would be end of September). > I'd rather have the current transition to a symbol ta

Re: print operand modifiers in the manual

2012-09-07 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Ian Lance Taylor wrote: Mike Stump wrote: Where in the manual are the machine specific print operand modifiers documented? I've looked around, and just can seem to find them; surely, I can't be the first to document such a modifier. To the best of my knowledge they are not documented in the m

Re: print operand modifiers in the manual

2012-09-07 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
David Daney wrote: Mike Stump wrote: David Daney wrote: Ian Lance Taylor wrote: Mike Stump wrote: Where in the manual are the machine specific print operand modifiers documented? I've looked around, and just can seem to find them; surely, I can't be the first to document such a modifier.