On 10/05/2012 06:08 PM, _ wrote:
What you guys think about this?
I think we should wait if the Rust folks come up with a sound (in the
type-theoretic sense) and useful (in terms of programmer burden)
solution. After that, we can contemplate whether we can retrofit their
solution onto
Hello,
Consider the attached plug-in, which adds a new dummy pass after the
“ssa” pass, with ‘TODO_rebuild_alias’ as its start flags:
#include gcc-plugin.h
#include plugin-version.h
#include plugin.h
#include tree-pass.h
int plugin_is_GPL_compatible;
static unsigned int
my_pass (void)
{
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello,
Consider the attached plug-in, which adds a new dummy pass after the
“ssa” pass, with ‘TODO_rebuild_alias’ as its start flags:
When compiling with -O0 a non-trivial file with that plug-in, one ends
up with:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
At -O0 no virtual operands are produced. TODO_rebuild_alias only computes
points-to sets which are in itself not useful.
What do you want to achieve with TODO_rebuild_alias?
I basically want to use ‘ptr_derefs_may_alias_p’ in this
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
At -O0 no virtual operands are produced. TODO_rebuild_alias only computes
points-to sets which are in itself not useful.
What do you want to achieve with
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
At -O0 no virtual operands are produced. TODO_rebuild_alias only computes
points-to sets which are in itself not
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
At -O0 no virtual operands are produced.
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Ludovic Courtès
On 10/06/2012 11:59 AM, _ wrote:
Not that I think that STL/Boost are not great solutions for many
problems out there.
But the fact is that there is and always will be c/c++ code that can't
and will not use it.
But surely the set of people refusing to use C++ smart pointers is the
same set
I'm working on a static analysis extension to GCC via my
gcc-python-plugin [1]
The analysis is interprocedural (memory leak detection, as it happens).
I have it working on one translation unit at a time, and I'm attempting
to get it to work within Link Time Optimization so that it can see the
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Ludovic Courtès
ludovic.cour...@inria.fr wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:42 PM,
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:17 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm working on a static analysis extension to GCC via my
gcc-python-plugin [1]
The analysis is interprocedural (memory leak detection, as it happens).
I have it working on one translation unit at a time, and I'm
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com skribis:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Ludovic Courtès
ludovic.cour...@inria.fr wrote:
[...]
So it looks like there’s additional state corresponding to these
variables that needs updating?
Ah, no, but I suppose TODO_update_address_taken
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 18:21 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:17 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm working on a static analysis extension to GCC via my
gcc-python-plugin [1]
The analysis is interprocedural (memory leak detection, as it happens).
I
The News Are Out: S R_G L plans to BUY Prolific Mexican Mineral Properties.
10,000 contiguous hectares of 100% title interest Gold and Silver leases!
This alone makes the price go thru the skies! Go buying S R_G L now. Buy
Alert for: S R_G L for Tuesday October 9th!
Trade: S R_G L
Company
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54854
Bug #: 54854
Summary: [avr] Deprecate and finally remove the -mshort-calls
command line option
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54854
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54851
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54851
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54853
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54815
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
08:32:56 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Oct 8 08:32:46 2012
New Revision: 192198
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192198
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54831
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #9 from Sergey Ostanevich sergos.gnu at gmail dot com 2012-10-08
08:55:25 UTC ---
Thanks for the reduced test, Dominique!
I see that vectorized did not manage to generate MIN after the change. Also, it
is looks pretty similar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-08
09:25:53 UTC ---
Note that somebody has still to post an updated patch to the library mailing
list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53528
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
09:29:13 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Oct 8 09:29:05 2012
New Revision: 192199
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192199
Log:
PR c++/53528
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #9 from Simon Baldwin simonb at google dot com 2012-10-08
09:32:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Also reported here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-10/msg00075.html
To add a little more detail, here is one diff seen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
09:50:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
I seem to be having this problem in GCC 4.5.4 , 4.6.3 and 4.7.2 :(
Ys, as already stated in the comments above, this is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
10:06:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I think Jack is confused regarding --enable-libstdcxx-timer. From emailing
me,
he seems to be under the impression that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08 10:09:34
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Oct 8 10:09:28 2012
New Revision: 192200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192200
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54854
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
10:14:01 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Oct 8 10:13:56 2012
New Revision: 192201
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192201
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54854
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
10:27:26 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Oct 8 10:27:15 2012
New Revision: 192202
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192202
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54831
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
10:35:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 28384
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28384
Untested fix
Per #c5.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54848
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54831
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54837
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54853
--- Comment #2 from Leonid Volnitsky leonid at volnitsky dot com 2012-10-08
10:54:17 UTC ---
but there are lots of errors
Below 1-line change commit which caused ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
10:59:46 UTC ---
N.B. prior to POSIX 2008 nanosleep was part of the Timers option, if OS X
supports that it should define _POSIX_TIMERS to 0, -1 or 200112L to indicate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
11:17:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
Except that one is POSIX and one is not. Additionally, you shouldn't assume
that g++ is being used. Hopefully,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54825
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
11:58:08 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 8 11:58:03 2012
New Revision: 192205
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192205
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54825
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54843
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54844
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54828
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53528
--- Comment #7 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-10-08 12:06:48 UTC ---
Sorry Michal for getting to your comment this late.
ethouris at gmail dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org a écrit:
Looks nice. Is that a big deal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54826
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54844
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-08
12:10:26 UTC ---
REAL_TYPE remains unhandled in tsubst_copy. First blush however, I'm not sure
if we shouldn't be passing REAL_TYPEs at all, or it's just a trivial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53528
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461
--- Comment #13 from Evren yurtesen eyurtese at abo dot fi 2012-10-08
12:16:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #11)
I seem to be having this problem in GCC 4.5.4 , 4.6.3 and 4.7.2 :(
Ys, as already stated in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
12:21:53 UTC ---
Because 2.4.2 has received the most testing and is known to work and to be
sufficient for GCC's needs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #27 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-08
13:47:32 UTC ---
The unistd.h header on darwin12 defines...
#define _POSIX_TIMERS (-1)/* [TMR] */
From the documentation on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54837
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54855
Bug #: 54855
Summary: Unnecessary duplication when performing scalar
operation on vector element
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #28 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-08
14:02:46 UTC ---
It seems like there is only two possible patches here using the existing
infrastructure in acinclude.m4 that would allow darwin's nanosleep() to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54831
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
14:10:25 UTC ---
Marek, the patch looks good, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54856
Bug #: 54856
Summary: Corrupted LTO type merging
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54856
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
14:17:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 28386
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28386
preprocessed sqlite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
14:18:58 UTC ---
Could you attach both dumps? (and use -fsched-verbose=5)
Did your test include r191838?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54855
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54856
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
14:25:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 28387
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28387
My experiemnts with fixup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53540
--- Comment #7 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-10-08 14:26:37 UTC ---
paolo.carlini at oracle dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org a écrit:
Dodji, time to ping? ;)
Right:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
14:32:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
It seems like there is only two possible patches here using the existing
infrastructure in acinclude.m4 that would allow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54796
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
14:37:53 UTC ---
I'm a bit uncomfortable with this approach. On the one hand, it's quite
simple, which is nice, but if all we get from it is the base term, we'll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-10-08 14:45:48 UTC ---
On 8-Oct-12, at 10:18 AM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-10-08 14:45:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 28389
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28389
20041113-1.c.224r.sched2.txt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
14:47:20 UTC ---
Can we take a step back and determine what exactly this PR is about? Several
of the comments make incorrect statements about the status quo, so I want
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #31 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-08
15:14:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
Can we take a step back and determine what exactly this PR is about? Several
of the comments make incorrect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #32 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-08
15:31:30 UTC ---
Would something simple like...
Index: acinclude.m4
===
--- acinclude.m4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54857
Bug #: 54857
Summary: Superfluous NOPs on Atom
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #33 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
15:55:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
(In reply to comment #30)
Can we take a step back and determine what exactly this PR is about?
Several
of the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #34 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
16:03:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
Would something simple like...
Index: acinclude.m4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54834
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54834
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2012-10-08 16:19:25
UTC ---
The error shows that libbacktrace is including ../gcc/include/unwind.h, but
that file should not exist at the time that libbacktrace is built. I assume
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54784
Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #35 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-08
16:31:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
The problem isn't finding nanosleep, it's finding what version of POSIX or
X/Open or SUS is supported, so we know
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54858
Bug #: 54858
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in cp_tree_equal
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54858
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
16:39:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 28390
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28390
gcc48-pr54858.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54858
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #36 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-08
16:44:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
So is _GLIBCXX_USE_SCHED_YIELD defined on darwin?
Yes, passing --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes and allowing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #38 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-10-08
17:03:39 UTC ---
I assume the option of using...
Index: libstdc++-v3/config/os/bsd/darwin/os_defines.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54859
Bug #: 54859
Summary: constexpr in template aliase rejected as non-constant
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #39 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
17:16:13 UTC ---
Yes, but why do you want to disable it?
Why does that patch define _GLIBCXX_USE_SCHED_YIELD?
That is correctly detected anyway by configure, without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54859
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54762
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54831
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08
17:40:53 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Oct 8 17:38:13 2012
New Revision: 192218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192218
Log:
PR54831.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54831
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51776
--- Comment #3 from bkorb at gnu dot org 2012-10-08 17:46:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
adding ... PR as a dependency so Bruce gets prodded when it changes state
Bruce has now been prodded. :) I will fix this in 3 weeks or so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08 18:00:25
UTC ---
Created attachment 28391
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28391
Proposed patch
Hm, the line
INTVAL (operands[3]) == -24 *
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52480
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28391|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54762
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-08 18:07:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
When you do this, I'd recommend generating real labels in gcc based on %=
(say, .L.fb%= instead of local labels, which should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54847
--- Comment #40 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
2012-10-08 18:33:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
N.B. prior to POSIX 2008 nanosleep was part of the Timers option, if OS X
supports that it should define
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
Donors, This Weekend Our Pink Pick Is: SM_A A
SM_A A Receives High Line Automotive Franchise Approval
10/1/2012 - Market Wire
Unexplored, under valued SM_A A has quietly expanded a revolutionary lead
generation algorythm for virtual automobile dealers, which has, just last
week, gained
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54857
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
