Dear Paul ,
Thanks for the inputs and yeah i looked on them and my basic query remains as
Target we are porting has registers like A and B of 8 bits and used in asm as
ld A,0xff
ld B,0xff
where A and B has value 0xff and AB can be used as pair like 16 bits as
ld AB,0xeeff
where A has
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:48:05PM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
where A has value oxff and B has value 0xee.
If the 16-bit registers overlap the 8-bit ones, then IMNSHO you don't
want to use different register numbers for the pairs, instead you just tell
GCC that HImode values must be put into
On 10/09/13 13:32, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Is it OK for trunk?
I would prefer that a consumer of this library be in place before you
commit. That is, until cilk_spawn/sync/etc go in.
Hi,
I'm porting gcc 4.5.2 on a private processor.
I encountered a problem concerning delay slots of conditionnal branch
instructions (Note : the processor has no 'annuled jump strategy')
Here is my delay slot definition :
(define_delay (eq_attr type jump)
[(and (eq_attr delayable
-Original Message-
From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 9:19 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: Jeff Law; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill
(ja...@redhat.com)
Subject: Re: Cilk Library
On 10/09/13 13:32, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Hi.
As a learning project I have tried to implement fastcall for m68k
target. I have largely sneak peeked at the i386 code to do this.
My fastcall convention uses d0-d2, a0-a1 and fp0-fp2 for arguments.
This also means that d2 is clubbed by calls to functions using the
fastcall ABI. I update the
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:31 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
Some questions for the GCC steering committee:
* is this JIT work a good thing? (I think so, obviously, but can I go
ahead and e.g. add it to the wiki under Current Projects?)
* do you like the general approach?
-Original Message-
From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of David
Malcolm
Sent: 09 October 2013 22:32
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: libgccjit.so: an embeddable JIT-compilation library based on GCC
As some may have seen I posted a patch to gcc-patches
Here is a sample of erroneous code :
sub 0,$R5,$R1 #compare $R5 to 0 ($R1 is clobbered)
jmpd.ifCC .L0#conditionnal delayed branch followed by 1
delay slot sub $R0,$R4,$R0 #compare $R4 to $R0 ($R0 is clobbered)
problem ...
Hi,
I have found an ICE reported as (PR 58682) and I have a fix.
However the testcase involved:
* compiling a 5 .i files with -fprofile-generate=
* running the executable
* compiling the same 5 .i files with -fprofile-use=, and only then getting the
ICE.
Is there anything in the GCC testing
Hi,
I have found an ICE reported as (PR 58682) and I have a fix.
Cool :)
However the testcase involved:
* compiling a 5 .i files with -fprofile-generate=
* running the executable
* compiling the same 5 .i files with -fprofile-use=, and only then getting
the ICE.
Is there anything in
On 10/10/13 07:31, BELBACHIR Selim wrote:
Why GCC doesn't see, in this case, that it's not safe to fill the delay slot
with my compare insn (which is a parallel RTX which clobber one register used
in fallthrough branch) ?
Is a processor 'annuled jump strategy' mandatory to handle delay slot
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 09:56 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:31 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
Some questions for the GCC steering committee:
* is this JIT work a good thing? (I think so, obviously, but can I go
ahead and e.g. add it to the wiki
I have a gcc 4.6.1 port that has the same sort of problems. I tried
selectively porting some patches from later 4.6 releases, but they didn't seem
to actually address the issue. I haven't looked at the trunk to see if there
are patches that are more apropos.
On Oct 10, 2013, at 12:33 PM,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36764
Duncan Sands baldrick at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
Bug ID: 58678
Summary: [4.9 Regression] pykde4-4.11.2 link error
(devirtualization too trigger happy)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, what prevents us from devirtualizing here? It seems to be bug to include a
class without linking with its implementation..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58679
Bug ID: 58679
Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in create_pre_exit, at
mode-switching.c:421 with -mavx after r202915
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58680
Bug ID: 58680
Summary: Spurious warnings from libasan
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58681
Bug ID: 58681
Summary: Missed RTL optimization - same insns before
unconditional jump as before the jump target
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58680
Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eugeni.stepanov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58668
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-linux-gnueabihf |arm-linux-gnueabihf,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58668
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58681
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
We used to factor
# c_1 = PHI -3(2), 0(4), 0(3)
# d_2 = PHI -1(2), 12(4), 12(3)
# e_3 = PHI -20(2), 26(4), 26(3)
# f_4 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58681
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We used to factor
# c_1 = PHI -3(2), 0(4), 0(3)
# d_2 = PHI -1(2), 12(4), 12(3)
# e_3 = PHI -20(2), 26(4), 26(3)
# f_4 = PHI -5(2), 7(4), 7(3)
lab:
into
bb42
# c_11 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58681
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
We used to factor
# c_1 = PHI -3(2), 0(4), 0(3)
# d_2 = PHI -1(2), 12(4),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
Hmm, what prevents us from devirtualizing here? It seems to be bug to
include a class without linking with its implementation..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Actually ipa-devirt has a code that is supposed to not make devirt happen in
this case - I will check out why it doesn't here.
But I think it is KDE's bug here. You have library with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58656
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58610
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58609
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58607
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58603
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|regression |target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58606
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58596
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58613
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58611
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58612
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58632
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58624
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58627
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58630
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58626
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58636
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58633
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58677
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
Started with r202525 (PR58404 missed-optimization fix), stopped with r203315
(PR58570 wrong-code fix). The cause of PR58570 was not r202525.
Can you check if the original
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58649
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58647
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58651
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58641
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58639
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57377
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Oct 10 12:01:23 2013
New Revision: 203353
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203353root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-10 Andreas Krebbel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58674
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58677
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58570
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 58677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58679
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58654
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58662
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31671
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ivchenko aivchenk at gmail dot com ---
thanks. I have sent it to gcc-paches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg00402.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58656
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
cptrf2 shows
bb 32:
- pretmp_278 = (integer(kind=8)) ival2_72;
- pretmp_279 = pretmp_278 + -1;
- pretmp_280 = *xxtrt_23(D)[pretmp_279];
bb 33:
# ival2_130 = PHI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58676
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58662
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks like changing the testcase line
d = foo (a == 0, (0, 35536));
to
d = foo (a == 0, -3);
fixes it. _No_ IL difference in 065t.mergephi2, but then 066t.vrp1
4.8.2 20131010 (prerelease) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.7.2, GMP version 4.3.0, MPFR version 2.4.1,
MPC version 0.8.1
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
GNU C (GCC) version 4.8.2 20131010 (prerelease) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58662
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58682
Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58682
--- Comment #2 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com ---
Here's my reading of the problem:
core_bench_list calls core_list_mergesort which indirectly (through a function
pointer) calls cmp_idx. The global max_count variable is updated in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58662
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
It looks like changing the testcase line
d = foo (a == 0, (0, 35536));
to
d = foo (a == 0, -3);
fixes it. _No_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58656
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 10 14:07:19 2013
New Revision: 203377
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203377root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58464
Bug 58464 depends on bug 58656, which changed state.
Bug 58656 Summary: [4.9 Regression] rnflow regressing after r202826
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58656
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58656
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58683
Bug ID: 58683
Summary: Internal compiler error: Segmentation fault compiling
Cilk Plus code with -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58662
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58682
--- Comment #3 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com ---
I have now a fix for this. I will prepare a patch for gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58677
--- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #1)
Started with r202525 (PR58404 missed-optimization fix), stopped with r203315
(PR58570 wrong-code fix). The cause of PR58570 was not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Oct 10 16:29:50 2013
New Revision: 203383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203383root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58670
* stmt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58684
Bug ID: 58684
Summary: powerpc uses only unordered floating-point compares
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Oct 10 16:39:52 2013
New Revision: 203384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203384root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58670
* stmt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58680
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Gribov tetra2005 at gmail dot com ---
/* Answering from my personal account */
According to http://marc.info/?t=13645834152 this may not be a problem for
Android. It seems that NDK links shared libs with -Bsymbolic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58226
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58226
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Oct 10 19:32:22 2013
New Revision: 203394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203394root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-09 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
May be related to trying to thread through 2 loop headers. ie,we're starting
the jump thread path outside any loops. On the jump thread path we find a loop
header, then the loop header
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
We're ending up with latches from two different loops going to the same
destination due to the jump thread path passing through multiple loops. This
ultimately causes the unroller to go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831
--- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
See the discussion that starts at:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130923/188747.html
(it continues in the following weeks) for optimization 2 of comment
++,fortran,lto --disable-werror
--enable-checking=release --with-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131010 (experimental) [trunk revision 203390
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58673
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58673
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30978
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30978action=edit
Patch to fix interaction between -mquad-memory and -mno-vsx-timode
The problem is an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58686
Bug ID: 58686
Summary: [BUG] vect_get_loop_niters() cound not get the correct
result for some loops.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
Joshua Cogliati jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30899|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #23 from Joshua Cogliati jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com ---
Created attachment 30980
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30980action=edit
Patch to fixup gcc float conversions in GCC
This changes the float conversions in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Fix going through bootstrap and regression testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687
Bug ID: 58687
Summary: #line __LINE__ ... changes subsequent line numbers
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
