Ping
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Andrey Turetskiy
andrey.turets...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's suppose, we are going to run target gcc driver from lto-wrapper.
How could a list of offload targets be passed there from option
parser?
In my opinion, the simpliest way to do it is to use
Hi,
I'm migrating my private port from gcc 4.5.2 to gcc 4.7.3. I noticed that
-fomit-frame-pointer was not triggered when using -O1 -O2 or -O3.
Could you indicate me how to modify my port to use -fomit-frame-pointer by
default (as it was in gcc 4.5.2 I presume) ?
Regards,
Selim
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/18/13 04:08, Richard Biener wrote:
I'd say that turning memset (0, '\0', 0) into a trap is bad from a QOI
perspective. Jeff, is there an easy way to avoid this? Testcase:
void fn (void *addr, int a)
{
if (a == 0)
I came across a news about gcc will support OpenACC/OpenMP target
directive. How can i download this version?
There some action should be done to get sources:
git clone git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
cd gcc
git config --add remote.origin.fetch
I've been thinking that it would be very useful for buildbots to run
contrib/config-list.mk. This tests stage1's all-gcc on a very wide
collection of targets. It builds everything with -Werror, so it
requires a recent host compiler (ideally trunk or the latest release).
Currently, many targets
On 2013-11-19 16:20, Diego Novillo wrote:
I've been thinking that it would be very useful for buildbots to run
contrib/config-list.mk. This tests stage1's all-gcc on a very wide
collection of targets. It builds everything with -Werror, so it
requires a recent host compiler (ideally trunk or the
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
On 2013-11-19 16:20, Diego Novillo wrote:
I've been thinking that it would be very useful for buildbots to run
contrib/config-list.mk. This tests stage1's all-gcc on a very wide
collection of targets.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
Currently, many targets are broken because of -Werror. I was thinking
of fixing them, but unless we keep them clean with a buildbot they
will regress.
How nobel. But isn't this what we have port maintainers for?
I'd say: Let it be! If a
Hi Diego!
On Tue, 2013-11-19 10:20:48 -0500, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
I've been thinking that it would be very useful for buildbots to run
contrib/config-list.mk. This tests stage1's all-gcc on a very wide
collection of targets. It builds everything with -Werror, so it
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
Hi Diego!
On Tue, 2013-11-19 10:20:48 -0500, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
I've been thinking that it would be very useful for buildbots to run
contrib/config-list.mk. This tests stage1's all-gcc on a very
On Tue, 2013-11-19 12:08:05 -0500, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-19 10:20:48 -0500, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com
wrote:
[config-list.mk]
Would this be hard to set up in your
On Tue, 2013-11-19 12:08:05 -0500, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
[conffig-list.mk]
Really, the only thing interesting about the script is the broad set
of targets it uses. If you just added them to the schedule of builds,
that should be sufficient. We could even decide not to add all
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-19 12:08:05 -0500, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
[conffig-list.mk]
Really, the only thing interesting about the script is the broad set
of targets it uses. If you just added them to the
On Tue, 2013-11-19 13:20:41 -0500, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-19 12:08:05 -0500, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com
wrote:
[conffig-list.mk]
Really, the only thing interesting about
On 19 November 2013 18:20, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Right, because you're using 4.8. These warnings disappear when using
trunk and/or do not actually break the build. I suppose this is too
much for the buildbot then? It won't have a recent trunk around, so
perhaps
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Joern Rennecke
joern.renne...@embecosm.com wrote:
On 19 November 2013 18:20, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Right, because you're using 4.8. These warnings disappear when using
trunk and/or do not actually break the build. I suppose this is too
On 11/20/2013 03:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:02:20PM +, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Unfortunately I don't have a ARM cross-compiler setup ready. Nathan could
test
it for us though.
It might shuffle things around enough to work around the issue, but with the
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 07:56:57AM +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
It appears not:
int __attribute__((noinline)) f(void)
{
{
register int x __asm__(eax);
x = 1;
}
{
register int y __asm__(eax);
return ++y;
}
}
extern void abort(void);
int main(void)
{
Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net writes:
On 11/20/2013 03:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:02:20PM +, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
Unfortunately I don't have a ARM cross-compiler setup ready. Nathan
could test it for us though.
It might shuffle things around enough
- Original Message -
From: Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net
To: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
Cc: Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com, linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com,
- Original Message -
From: Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com
To: Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net
Cc: Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Peter Zijlstra
pet...@infradead.org, Catalin Marinas
catalin.mari...@arm.com, Nathan Lynch nathan_ly...@mentor.com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59185
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59185
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced testcase:
#include stdarg.h
void zlog (const char *format, ...)
{
va_list args[5];
int index;
for (index = 0; index 5; index++)
va_start(args[index], format);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 42145, which changed state.
Bug 42145 Summary: Incorrect may be used uninitialized warning for a very
specific test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59183
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59176
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57517
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 19 09:21:07 2013
New Revision: 205010
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205010root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-19 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57517
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 19 09:23:52 2013
New Revision: 205012
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205012root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-19 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58941
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 19 09:22:45 2013
New Revision: 205011
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205011root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-19 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57517
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.3, 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58941
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59187
Bug ID: 59187
Summary: internal error with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59187
--- Comment #1 from Alessio alessio211734 at yahoo dot it ---
Created attachment 31246
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31246action=edit
preprocess file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59187
--- Comment #2 from Alessio alessio211734 at yahoo dot it ---
Created attachment 31247
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31247action=edit
.s generate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56824
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57915
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57985
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59179
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59073
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58504
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59150
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52714
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58754
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51219
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58410
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58668
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59044
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58369
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58954
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58561
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58375
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58504
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58421
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58612
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58630
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58668
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59186
Marcel Wid osensei80 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||osensei80 at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58421
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Somewhere between 20131030 and 20131101.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58776
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58812
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58814
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58844
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58826
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58837
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55439
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58864
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i?86-*-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58874
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55439
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58893
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58893
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58893
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Running in valgrind shows loads of invalid accesses before the diagnostic
about missing xxx.h.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58918
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58903
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58921
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58943
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58944
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, on GIMPLE all is ok
bb 2:
i_2 = c;
*i_2 = foo ();
but we expand it like
;; *i_2 = foo (); --- note, TER applies!
(insn 5 4 6 (set (reg:QI 0 ax)
(const_int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59186
David Krauss potswa at mac dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58826
--- Comment #6 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
I assume that this bug should be closed since it is not reproducible after the
latest LRA fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58630
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||congh at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58630
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5)
Sorry still present at revision 205008: see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-11/msg01438.html or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52731
--- Comment #1 from Yukhin Kirill kirill.yukhin at intel dot com ---
Reproduced on recent trunk.
It seems that we have in ia64.c:
int
ia64_st_address_bypass_p (rtx producer, rtx consumer)
{
rtx dest, reg, mem;
gcc_assert (producer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 19 13:28:35 2013
New Revision: 205026
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205026root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-11-19 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58964
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
1 - 100 of 474 matches
Mail list logo
