Matthew Fortune matthew.fort...@imgtec.com writes:
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Matthew Fortune matthew.fort...@imgtec.com writes:
Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Thanks Joseph. I guess I'm not
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Look at how we implement #pragma ivdep (see replace_loop_annotate ()
and fortran/trans-stmt.c where it builds ANNOTATE_EXPR).
Note that the C and C++ front-ends also support it.
We are planning to submit a patch to
The code resides in Chromium project, please see full source code:
https://github.com/scheib/chromium/blob/master/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/syscall.cc
Martin
On 03/24/2014 06:34 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz wrote:
I've been
dw limegreenso...@yahoo.com writes:
asm ( : =m (*x), =r (y));
you have to assume that the address in %0 might use the same register as %1
Ok, now I'm getting there. It helps that I've compiled some examples
and can see what is happening. This one is subtle. I'm going to have
to go
Dear All,
The GCC source reference 4.8.1 will synthesized some of the double
word operations(SI mode) like add /sub in the below case from the word
size (HI) patterns,
(code snippet)
expand_binop_directly function in the optabs.c.
/* These can be done a word at a time by propagating carries.
On 03/25/14 06:23, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
Dear All,
The GCC source reference 4.8.1 will synthesized some of the double
word operations(SI mode) like add /sub in the below case from the word
size (HI) patterns,
(code snippet)
expand_binop_directly function in the optabs.c.
/* These can be done
Hi,
CppCon is the annual, week-long face-to-face gathering for the entire
C++ community. The conference is organized by the C++ community for the
community and so we invite you to present.
Have you learned something interesting about C++, maybe a new technique
possible in C++11? Or perhaps you
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Martin Liška mli...@suse.cz wrote:
The code resides in Chromium project, please see full source code:
https://github.com/scheib/chromium/blob/master/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/syscall.cc
The easy workaround is to make SyscallAsm global. And frankly I would
put
You can certainly nest them, no?
ANNOTATE_EXPR ANNOTATE_EXPR i != 0, ivdep, unroll, 2
Yes, that works, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
The easiest way to do that is to add a flag that either (a) stops the
compiler emitting a .nan at all or (b) gets it to emit .nan legacy
regardless of the actual encoding used. It's really just a slight
variation on (2), the difference being that we might be using 2008
under the covers.
Hi
Hello,
I've been compiling Chromium with LTO and I noticed that WPA
stream_out forks and do parallel:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02621.html.
I am unable to fit in 16GB memory: ld uses about 8GB and lto1 about
6GB. When WPA start to fork, memory consumption increases so
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Rich Fuhler wrote:
Hi Richard, we talked about (a.) originally - it was the design of the
libraries. Joseph, as I recollect, you raised language issues with
requirements for compile-time constant values for NaNs. Would you accept
a non-constant NaN implementation in
Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Rich Fuhler wrote:
Hi Richard, we talked about (a.) originally - it was the design of the
libraries. Joseph, as I recollect, you raised language issues with
requirements for compile-time constant values for NaNs. Would you
Matthew Fortune matthew.fort...@imgtec.com writes:
Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Rich Fuhler wrote:
Hi Richard, we talked about (a.) originally - it was the design of the
libraries. Joseph, as I recollect, you raised language issues with
requirements
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Can you envisage any way of us raising a warning/error if INVALID
exceptions get enabled in this hybrid NaN world? I believe that is the
only major problem area with mixing NaNs. I.e. It should be possible to
introduce a magic symbol if LD merged
[Moving to gcc@ from gcc-patches@]
Community,
We've got 11 student proposals (good job, students!), and only the N top-rated
ones will be accepted into the program. Therefore, we as a community need to
make sure that the ratings are representative of our goals -- making GCC the
best compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60643
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
Bug ID: 60644
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Build of i686-pc-linux-android is
broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If SYS_gettid is not defined, then it is a bug in the bionic libc headers as
NR_gettid is defined in the kernel headers.
Also pthread_yield should be defined in pthread.h if it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well pthread_yield should be replaced with the POSIX version: sched_yield()
instead.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Ivchenko aivchenk at gmail dot com ---
That (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
Well pthread_yield should be replaced with the POSIX version: sched_yield()
instead.
Right.. the attached patch cured the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ivchenko aivchenk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 32443
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32443action=edit
Renaming ANDROID to __ANDROID__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60645
Bug ID: 60645
Summary: locale::facet::_S_get_c_locale does not handle
__gthread_once error codes.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60643
--- Comment #10 from hongxu jia hongxu.jia at windriver dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
Works for me with an unmodified GCC 4.8.2.
So please try removing all of the Open-embedded patches since one of them is
causing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646
Bug ID: 60646
Summary: Investigate improved complex division algorithms
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45020
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60635
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60636
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We should instead instrument ABS_EXPR (you can instrument that as u 0 ? u :
-u of course).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60640
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60641
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60331
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 25 09:30:10 2014
New Revision: 208806
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208806root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60331
* semantics.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60331
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60645
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The only error code specified by POSIX is EINVAL which cannot happen here,
because the pthread_once_t is statically initialized and controlled entirely by
the library.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60645
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
Bug ID: 60647
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at
ipa-prop.c:2112
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59176
--- Comment #20 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Mar 25 10:57:07 2014
New Revision: 208809
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208809root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-25 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
__vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.v.a at ngs dot ru
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Richard, this started with r207879.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60635
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 25 11:43:03 2014
New Revision: 208811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208811root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-25 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60648
Bug ID: 60648
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) in
expand_binop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60635
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60649
Bug ID: 60649
Summary: [ASAN] Bogus 'y' may be used uninitialized warning
(affects bootstrap-asan)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60648
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60191
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
Hmm,
I debugged a bit and found this:
the problem starts in gfc_get_function_type
it is first called on sym-name = make_real,
and then recursively again on the same sym.
So
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58013
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: danglin
Date: Tue Mar 25 12:06:17 2014
New Revision: 208813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208813root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/58013
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58013
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60191
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60647
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's even wrong-code it seems. IPA SRA is confused about the KR style
functions and
static fn3 (dpy, winInfo, visrgn) struct _XDisplay *dpy;
{
int b = fn1 (0, winInfo);
fn4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60650
Bug ID: 60650
Summary: [ARM] LRA ICE assign_by_spills
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60191
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #10)
gfortran currently generates when it does not know the explicit interface
something like:
float funct(...)
note that:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60650
--- Comment #1 from Yvan Roux yvan.roux at linaro dot org ---
testcase is to big to be attached... reducing...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60651
Bug ID: 60651
Summary: Mode switching instructions are sometimes emitted in
the wrong order
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60648
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60651
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32447
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32447action=edit
patch
The attached patch implements this aforementioned insertion at the end
of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60648
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
We're getting non-canonical as part of the index computation in do_tablejump:
(gdb) p debug_rtx (index)
(plus:SI (mult:SI (const_int 0 [0])
(const_int 4 [0x4]))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #38 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90 tests fail on hppa*-*-hpux11* (4.8 and 4.9):
(en15.0) 9.E+03 expected: 10.E+03
(en15.0) 9.E+03 expected:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60648
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60640
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
Bug ID: 60653
Summary: [4.9 Regression] gfortran: ICE (segmentation fault) in
lra
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #39 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90 tests fail on hppa*-*-hpux11* (4.8 and 4.9):
...
After r208780 (for 4.9, not backported yet to 4.8)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
fails with -O1 and -O2, works with -O0. fails with both -marm/-mthumb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
seen with a build of the paw package in Debian/unstable and Ubuntu/trusty.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60650
--- Comment #2 from Yvan Roux yvan.roux at linaro dot org ---
Created attachment 32449
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32449action=edit
reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60652
Bug ID: 60652
Summary: System.OS_Constants CRTSCTS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60654
Bug ID: 60654
Summary: format warnings don't work with PROGMEM/PSTR
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Bug ID: 60655
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: output_operand: invalid
expression as operand
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60656
Bug ID: 60656
Summary: [4.8/4.9 regression] x86 vectorization produces wrong
code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37428
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609
Charles Baylis charles.baylis at linaro dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The expression being put out is :
(const:SI (not:SI (symbol_ref:SI (*.LANCHOR0) [flags 0x182])))
#0 0x003105033410 in exit () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Command lines I was using to reproduce this with a cross compiler.
./cc1 -g -mthumb -fdata-sections -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -mfloat-abi=hard -O2
-march=armv7-a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60650
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60191
--- Comment #12 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
Created attachment 32448
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32448action=edit
possible fix
Ok, the attached patch seems to fix at least the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28575
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
Bug ID: 60657
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: error: insn does not satisfy its
constraints
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
seen with every package using this boost header
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35449
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35449
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 25 16:50:54 2014
New Revision: 208815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208815root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/35449
* doc/extend.texi (Example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35449
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
--- Comment #17 from Mircea Namolaru mircea.namolaru at inria dot fr ---
Yes, data dependencies computation is expensive in the polyehdral model
and it could take considerable time - but it is worrying that in too many
cases fails to provide
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60658
Bug ID: 60658
Summary: std::atomicT* is unexpectedly not lock-free
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Grosser grosser at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mircea Namolaru from comment #17)
Yes, data dependencies computation is expensive in the polyehdral model
and it could take considerable time - but it is worrying
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60659
Bug ID: 60659
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in get_polymorphic_call_info, at
ipa-devirt.c:1292
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60375
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 25 18:00:37 2014
New Revision: 208817
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208817root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60375
* parser.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60628
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 25 18:00:30 2014
New Revision: 208816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208816root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60628
* decl.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60656
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
