Hi Tobias,
I tried to incorporate all your comments in the following patch. It
also contains traversing of ISL AST and its dump to a file. You can
find out more about this at the following link
http://romangareev.blogspot.ru/2014/05/gsoc-report-i.html
--
Cheers, Roman Gareev
patch
Description:
On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:46 AM Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 05/21/2014 12:25 AM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> Simpson does the Live range shrinking and reduction of register
> pressure by using the computation that are not load and store but the
> arithmetic computation. The comput
On 25/05/2014 13:12, Roman Gareev wrote:
Hi Tobias,
I tried to incorporate all your comments in the following patch. It
also contains traversing of ISL AST and its dump to a file. You can
find out more about this at the following link
http://romangareev.blogspot.ru/2014/05/gsoc-report-i.html
I ran across this puzzling difference between gcc and llvm today and think the
specification to produce consistent output for this code should be worked out.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15929795/llvm-and-gcc-different-output-same-code/23856132#23856132
I presented this in the Freenode #gcc
Snapshot gcc-4.10-20140525 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.10-20140525/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.10 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
GCC 4.8 for VAX is generating a subreg:HI for mem:SI indexed address. This
eventually gets caught by an assert in change_address_1. Since the MEM rtx is
SI, legimate_address_p thinks it's fine.
I have a change to vax.md which catches these but it's extremely ugly and I
have to think there'
On 23-May-14 01:59 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 05/23/2014 10:07 AM, shmeel gutl wrote:
Exposed pipeline is not my problem. Negative latency is my problem. I
don't see negative latency for c6x, not in unit reservations and not in
adjust cost. Did I miss something?
You just need to model it dif
On 23-May-14 05:20 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 2014-05-23, 3:49 AM, shmeel gutl wrote:
On 21-May-14 06:30 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
I am just curious what happens when you put
insn2, insn1.
and insn2 uses a result of insn1 in 6 cycles and insn1 producing the
result in 3 cycles, but there
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 03:55:38PM -0700, John wrote:
> I ran across this puzzling difference between gcc and llvm today and think
> the specification to produce consistent output for this code should be worked
> out.
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15929795/llvm-and-gcc-different-output-sam
