Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps

2014-06-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Richard Biener >>> wrote: On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Prathame

Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps

2014-06-23 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni > wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >>> wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Prathame

Re: [GSoC] generation of GCC expression trees from isl ast expressions

2014-06-23 Thread Roman Gareev
> I assume so. However, we always want signed types, so the second > argument should be zero, no? Yes, you are right. > How did you verify that the semantics of the GCC and isl expressions are > identical? I haven't tested it on examples yet. I've only matched their semantics from the isl manual

Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps

2014-06-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >>> wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Pra

Re: [GSoC] decision tree first steps

2014-06-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni > wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >>> wrote: Replying to the last mail in the th

Re: [GSoC] commutative patterns

2014-06-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni > wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >>> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > The attached

Re: [GSoC] generation of GCC expression trees from isl ast expressions

2014-06-23 Thread Tobias Grosser
On 23/06/2014 08:34, Roman Gareev wrote: Hi Tobias, I'm currently working on generation of GCC expression trees from isl ast expressions . Could you please answer a few questions about it? 1. How is it better to generate tree from isl_ast_expr_int? In the temporary variant I call isl_ast_expr_g