> > and wondering if anyone can explain to me what's wrong with this
> > transformation. Having worked through all four cases of A and C1
> > positive and negative, it seems to me that the extra bits 'fed in' to
> > the most-significant end of the result are the same either way (i.e. the
> > XOR of
On 24 June 2014 18:16, Eric Christopher wrote:
> Might want to try asking them to run some comparison numbers though. I
> remember they did before EuroLLVM a while back when we were looking at
> merging our two aarch64 ports.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-April/072393.html
In t
On 06/24/14 07:42, Alan Lawrence wrote:
I'm looking at git commit ea1ac559 / svn r76965, January 2014 (archive:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg03406.html), which prevents
(ashiftrt (xor A C1) C2)
from being commuted to
(xor (ashiftrt A C2) (ashiftrt C1 C2))
and wondering if any
> Could you recommend me what best options you think I should use for this
> processor.
>
> As I wrote, I am more interesting in aarch64 which can be used in a
> server (as you know RedHat works on a server market) but unfortunately I
> have no such machine for SPEC benchmarking.
>
I know Qualcomm
On 06/24/2014 10:57 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
> The ball-park number you have probably won't change much.
>
>>>
>> Unfortunately, that is the configuration I can use on my system because
>> of lack of libraries for other configurations.
>
> Using --with-fpu={neon / neon-vfpv4} shouldn't cau
I wonder how much of that is due to auto-vectorization (on LLVM, -O2+
turns it on, I suppose GCC is only on -O3?). From Ramana's point,
there may be nothing serious if you haven't enabled NEON, though.
Auto-vec is turned off when you have -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 . That implies No Neon.
Ramana
Also
The ball-park number you have probably won't change much.
Unfortunately, that is the configuration I can use on my system because
of lack of libraries for other configurations.
Using --with-fpu={neon / neon-vfpv4} shouldn't cause you ABI issues with
libraries for any other configurations.
On 06/24/2014 10:42 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 24 June 2014 15:11, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>> A few people asked me about new performance comparison of latest GCC
>> and LLVM. So I've finished it and put it on my site
>>
>> http://vmakarov.fedorapeople.org/spec/
>>
>> The comparison is achi
On 06/24/2014 10:36 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>
> On 24/06/14 15:11, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>>A few people asked me about new performance comparison of latest GCC
>> and LLVM. So I've finished it and put it on my site
>>
>> http://vmakarov.fedorapeople.org/spec/
>>
>>The compariso
On 24 June 2014 15:11, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> A few people asked me about new performance comparison of latest GCC
> and LLVM. So I've finished it and put it on my site
>
> http://vmakarov.fedorapeople.org/spec/
>
> The comparison is achievable from 2014 link and links under it in
> the le
On 24/06/14 15:11, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
A few people asked me about new performance comparison of latest GCC
and LLVM. So I've finished it and put it on my site
http://vmakarov.fedorapeople.org/spec/
The comparison is achievable from 2014 link and links under it in
the left frame.
A few people asked me about new performance comparison of latest GCC
and LLVM. So I've finished it and put it on my site
http://vmakarov.fedorapeople.org/spec/
The comparison is achievable from 2014 link and links under it in
the left frame.
These pages are also achievable as
http://vmak
I'm looking at git commit ea1ac559 / svn r76965, January 2014 (archive:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg03406.html), which prevents
(ashiftrt (xor A C1) C2)
from being commuted to
(xor (ashiftrt A C2) (ashiftrt C1 C2))
and wondering if anyone can explain to me what's wrong with t
Hello David,
On 20 Jun 14:46, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
> > Does this look OK?
>
> The GCC SC has decided to allow this library in the GCC sources.
Great news, thanks!
> If the library is not going to be expanded to support all GPUs and
> of
Hi GCC,
My name is Steven and I work for Go-Parts, an e-commerce company. We have
resources to spare, and have a very competent server admin team helping us
mirror open-source software.
We would now like to donate some mirrors (FTP, RSYNC, HTTP) in 4 different
geographic locations. We have alrea
15 matches
Mail list logo
