Hi Honza,
After discussing with Richard Beiner via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077, it look like it is
an existing problem in trunk and is masked due the fact that stage1
and stage2 compilers in trunk are built with enable-checking and hence
same garbage collection tuning
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Venkataramanan Kumar
venkataramanan.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Honza,
After discussing with Richard Beiner via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077, it look like it is
an existing problem in trunk and is masked due the fact that stage1
and
Dear Manuel and Ilya.
Thank you very much for you advices.
I'll take it into consideration.
Evgeniya
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
The wiki also contains the following: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LoopOptTasks
Probably very outdated, but
Hi,
Various targets implement -momit-leaf-frame-pointer to avoid using a frame
pointer in leaf
functions. Currently the GCC mid-end does not provide a way of doing this, so
targets have resorted
to hacks. Typically this involves forcing flag_omit_frame_pointer to be true in
the
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Venkataramanan Kumar
venkataramanan.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Honza,
After discussing with Richard Beiner via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077, it look like it is
an existing problem in trunk and is masked due the fact that stage1
On August 18, 2014 8:46:00 PM CEST, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
The following seems to fix it. In testing now.
Will streaming as non-reference prevent DECL from being merged and
tails of BLOCK_VAR chains
to be corrupted?
Yes, the decl ends up in the function section then, not
Hello,
I am designing a new language. I hope I can customize the front end of
gcc to suit my language. I am comfortable with lex yacc. I went
through the source code of gcc but could not locate any lex or yacc
source file.
I prefer to modify the C compiler.
Can you please explain the source
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Tomsy Paul tomsyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am designing a new language. I hope I can customize the front end of
gcc to suit my language. I am comfortable with lex yacc. I went
through the source code of gcc but could not locate any lex or yacc
source
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20140820 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20140820/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 21 August 2014 00:31, Tomsy Paul tomsyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am designing a new language. I hope I can customize the front end of
gcc to suit my language. I am comfortable with lex yacc. I went
through the source code of gcc but could not locate any lex or yacc
source file.
I
Thank you very much for the quick help!!
Let me look into the articles contact you for further help.
On 8/21/14, Manuel López-Ibáñez lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 August 2014 00:31, Tomsy Paul tomsyp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am designing a new language. I hope I can customize the
On 08/20/2014 08:22 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
2. Change the mid-end to call arch_frame_pointer_required even when
!flag_omit_frame_pointer.
Um, it does that already. At least as far as I can see from
ira_setup_eliminable_regset and update_eliminables.
It turns out to be much easier to
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Jiri Kosina wrote:
We have been chasing a memory corruption bug, which turned out to be
caused by very old gcc (4.3.4), which happily turned conditional load into
a non-conditional one, and that broke correctness (the condition was met
only if lock was held) and
Hi all.
I'm trying to build GCC 4.8.3 with ObjC support for ARM Cortex-M4.
I had this working with an earlier version of GCC (I think it was GCC 4.5).
-But now I get build errors.
It seems to me that it's required to add the --enable-libobjc switch (otherwise
I the build stops when it can't find
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
I assume you found this by using a libc with
a malloc that has buffer overflow detection.
Actually, no. We inspected the function manually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180
--- Comment #5 from Jan Čapek jan.capek at braiins dot cz ---
(In reply to DJ Delorie from comment #4)
Perhaps you need this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00993.html
DJ Delorie,
you are the man! The patch works as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62199
Bug ID: 62199
Summary: ICE with -Wlogical-not-parentheses
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62199
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62111
--- Comment #12 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #11)
Re: #c7:
In sh.c, change char amount[6] to signed char
amount[6] -- does that help?
Hm, using 'signed char' instead of 'char'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61996
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33366
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33366action=edit
proposed patch for 5,4.9,4.8
David, could you please try out this patch and see if it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Not sure if same or different - I am seeing
ChooseInitialTour.c:177:1: internal compiler error: in
lra_update_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1218
from trunk 20140820.
ice goes away
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62190
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62132
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62171
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62171
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And maybe set DECL_BY_REFERENCE, a mere REFERENCE_TYPE doesn't prevent
you from doing (param)[2] which we'd miscompile. Not sure who added
that REFERENCE_TYPE code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62132
--- Comment #2 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
s/unwind with fp/unwind without fp/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62132
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62132
--- Comment #4 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Note that same problem may pop up in other tests as well so IMHO better fix
this in general.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62200
Bug ID: 62200
Summary: libstdc++ initialization priority
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62200
--- Comment #1 from Václav Zeman vhaisman at gmail dot com ---
And it dumps core on Cygwin as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62132
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #4)
Note that same problem may pop up in other tests as well so IMHO better fix
this in general.
Well, we could switch frame pointers in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62132
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #2)
s/unwind with fp/unwind without fp/
it should be possible to do this, if m32 code is compiled with
-funwind-tables.
for m64, that's already
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62201
Bug ID: 62201
Summary: ICE with -Wlogical-not-parentheses: tree check:
expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62199
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62201
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62190
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 20 11:06:48 2014
New Revision: 214216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214216root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62190
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62098
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Aug 20 11:31:21 2014
New Revision: 214217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214217root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport fix for PR target/62098
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62098
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Created attachment 33367
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33367action=edit
Preprocessed and assembly files for gcc and clang
Preprocessed and assembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62202
Bug ID: 62202
Summary: g++ does not accept typedef-name after struct even if
-fpermissive is used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59304
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: manu
Date: Wed Aug 20 12:48:16 2014
New Revision: 214221
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214221root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-08-20 Manuel López-Ibáñez
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59304
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876
Bug 58876 depends on bug 59304, which changed state.
Bug 59304 Summary: #pragma diagnostic pop after warning fails for options
unspecified in the command-line and disabled by default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59304
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62203
Bug ID: 62203
Summary: arm-rtems ICE compiling libgcc/fixed-bit.c
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62203
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62132
--- Comment #7 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #6)
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #2)
s/unwind with fp/unwind without fp/
it should be possible to do this, if m32 code is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62141
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62203
--- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm dmalcolm at redhat dot com ---
Sorry about this; I believe I introduced this in r214197, and fixed it in
r214207.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62203
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Could your change have impacted multiple targets? I see ICE on i386, nios2,
powerpc, and sh.
I would be happy to learn I just started a sweep at an unfortunate point. I
have updated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62203
--- Comment #4 from Dave Malcolm dmalcolm at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #3)
Could your change have impacted multiple targets? I see ICE on i386, nios2,
powerpc, and sh.
Yes. Sorry again.
I would be happy to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62175
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33368
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33368action=edit
somewhat autoreduced testcsae
very slow to reduce. attaching what I have.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62204
Bug ID: 62204
Summary: internal compiler error with -Wall
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #16 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sje
Date: Wed Aug 20 15:56:45 2014
New Revision: 214226
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214226root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #17 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sje
Date: Wed Aug 20 15:57:42 2014
New Revision: 214227
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214227root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Thanks, Jason!
This is patch I am testing that cures the testcase from Comment #7. I would
apprechiate if someone could reduce it - my simple attempts has failed and I am
bit in hurry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62176
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Aug 20 16:18:27 2014
New Revision: 214229
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214229root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Steven G. Kargl ka...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091
--- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced testcase for Comment #7:
typedef enum
{
} UErrorCode;
class UnicodeString
{
public:
UnicodeString ();
virtual ~UnicodeString ();
};
class A
{
UnicodeString
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Aug 20 16:23:55 2014
New Revision: 214231
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214231root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Steven G. Kargl ka...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Aug 20 16:22:20 2014
New Revision: 214230
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214230root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Steven G. Kargl ka...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62205
Bug ID: 62205
Summary: GNAT does not accept class types for Default_Iterator
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61776
--- Comment #8 from wmi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wmi
Date: Wed Aug 20 16:47:12 2014
New Revision: 214233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214233root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
Wei Mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
--- Comment #16 from wmi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wmi
Date: Wed Aug 20 16:47:12 2014
New Revision: 214233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214233root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
Wei Mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62206
Bug ID: 62206
Summary: Gcc doesn't optimize methods in template class, even
when they don't depend on the template variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62206
ori bar tohava at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62206
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I would expect gcc to generate only a single version of `olga_rocks`.
Well it has to generate two different functions, that is:
Cint::foobar != Cdouble::foobar
has to hold true.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62198
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
Sounds like a Clang bug to me. The type pointed to by const int (*)[10]
is array of 10 const int, which is not a const-qualified type.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61776
--- Comment #9 from wmi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wmi
Date: Wed Aug 20 17:09:25 2014
New Revision: 214237
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214237root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
Wei Mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62206
--- Comment #2 from ori bar tohava at gmail dot com ---
It can still generate two different functions which are just single jump
instructions to the same code.
Also, does the C++ standard say that your inequality must be true?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
--- Comment #17 from wmi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wmi
Date: Wed Aug 20 17:09:25 2014
New Revision: 214237
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214237root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
Wei Mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62207
Bug ID: 62207
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl
minimal' structure, have 'overload' in tsubst_copy, at
cp/pt.c
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Known
-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20140820 (experimental) [trunk revision 214209] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O3 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-trunk -flto -m64 -O3 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.9 -flto -m32 -O3 small.c; a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -flto
++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20140820 (experimental) [trunk revision 214209] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 -c fn1.c
$ gcc-trunk -O0 -c main.c
$ gcc-trunk -O1 *.o
$ ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -flto -O0 -c fn1.c
$ gcc-trunk -flto -O0 -c main.c
$ gcc-trunk -flto -O1 *.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
--- Comment #5 from xur at google dot com ---
I sent a patch for this a few days ago:
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg87155.html
It's pending review.
Thanks,
-Rong
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:36 AM, ktietz at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, I remember. I didn't comment on it.
The following checks aren't ok.
'#if !defined(_WIN32)'
you should disable those parts *only* if ftw API isn't present. This you should
check by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62198
--- Comment #2 from Paul H. Hargrove PHHargrove at lbl dot gov ---
Both icc (v13.0.1) and pgcc (v12.9-0) agree with gcc (and thus disagree with
clang) on this:
$ cat -n q.c
1
2 typedef unsigned long size_t;
3 extern const void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62198
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62210
Bug ID: 62210
Summary: download_prerequisites does not download into current
directory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62211
Bug ID: 62211
Summary: ./configure --with-float= and ARM
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
--- Comment #7 from xur at google dot com ---
OK. I'll fix this and submit another patch.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:26 AM, ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62212
Bug ID: 62212
Summary: ICE compiling template function with array reference
parameter whose size depends on a template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks, corrected the testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62203
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62203
--- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Appears to be fixed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62177
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62198
--- Comment #4 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com ---
I realize that this bug has been closed as invalid, thus making the warning
valid.
However, if the warning is valid what can be done to this declaration to avoid
the warning?
const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44054
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: manu
Date: Wed Aug 20 23:07:29 2014
New Revision: 214245
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214245root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-08-21 Manuel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62175
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
struct B {
B(int = 0);
};
int c;
int *d;
struct G {
G();
int numProcs_;
};
int fn1();
B fn2() {
if (c)
return 0;
return B();
}
long fn3(long p1, long p2) {
if (p2 p1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|manu at gcc dot gnu.org|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35376
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|manu at gcc dot gnu.org|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52959
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58589
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59098
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61405
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
