https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63472
--- Comment #4 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced test cases for all three crashes. I suspect multiple have a similar
root cause (except perhaps for the expand_expr_addr_expr_1 one)
It looks like the transaction code messes up cfgloops.
On 10/06/2014 06:57 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I posted it with v2 in the subject. I have now attached it.
There is a pasto in the v2:
@@ -1764,6 +1772,12 @@ extern int sparc_indent_opcode;
#define AS_LEON_FLAG -Av8
#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_AS_LEONV7
+#define AS_LEONV7_FLAG -Aleon
+#else
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:44:59PM +0400, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
Ok, then here it is a new patch (tested and bootstrapped on linux).
On linux with --disable-tls now all libgomp make check tests pass; for
Android I've patched toolchain and tried test from one of the
mentioned bugs, test
Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/06/2014 08:50 PM, Siva Chandra wrote:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/03/2014 05:41 PM, Siva Chandra wrote:
I understand that knowing whether a copy-ctor or a d-tor has been
explicitly defaulted is not
You're right. I have attached an updated patch. The new code becomes:
#ifdef HAVE_AS_LEON
#define AS_LEON_FLAG -Aleon
+#define AS_LEONV7_FLAG -Aleon
#else
#define AS_LEON_FLAG -Av8
+#define AS_LEONV7_FLAG -Av7
#endif
The patch is OK for all active branches (trunk, 4.9 and
After internal discussion this changes
(match logical_inverted_value
(ne truth_valued_p@0 integer_onep)
(if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0)))
(logical_inverted_value @0)))
to
(match (logical_inverted_value @0)
(ne truth_valued_p@0 integer_onep)
(if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0)
I wonder if this is worth abstracting into a callee_fn () cgraph edge
method?
That would rather be a cgraph node method without callee in the name since
we also apply it to callers, something like:
struct function *cgraph_node::cfun (void)
and the code in can_inline_edge_p would just be:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Ok, so unless there are objections, I plan to commit patches 1, 2, 4, 5, and
6,
which have been previously approved, in that sequence. (Of those, all bar
patch
2 are AArch64 only.) I think this is better than
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Ok, so unless there are objections, I plan to commit patches 1, 2, 4, 5, and
6,
which have been previously approved, in that sequence. (Of
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
I wonder if this is worth abstracting into a callee_fn () cgraph edge
method?
That would rather be a cgraph node method without callee in the name since
we also apply it to callers, something like:
struct function
The docs on the asm_p flags say there is sth wrong with the asm constraints
so maybe better do
if (!asm_p)
error_at (loc, );
with an appropriate message and location?
OK, I guess I can copy-and-paste reload1.c:spill_failure there.
--
Eric Botcazou
Testcase? I think it would be better to handle this in the canonical type
merging code in lto.c - or how does it end up working without LTO? That is,
what does the Ada frontend do to make sure get_alias_set handles this
correctly?
It manages the alias sets, see
On 06/10/14 22:00, Mark Wielaard wrote:
If no java maintainer responds, try CCing java-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
to draw their attention.
Please. I can't see the patch here.
Andrew.
Jakub,
First, thank you very much for reviewing this set of patches.
I think it's better to start with an answer to your last mail:
On 10/03/2014 11:20 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
What kind of more complex expressions do you need and why?
GNAT can produce array types that make sense only as
On 10/03/2014 06:41 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Patches 1-4 are OK.
+ bool pell_conversions = true;
I don't understand pell. Do you mean strip?
Absolutely: I though it was correct English. I replaced all occurences
of pell with strip. Updates patches will follow...
Thank you very much
On 6 October 2014 22:31:18 CEST, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Is it ok to commit these two patches now?
Yes, it is OK, thanks!
I do not see documentation of the new parameter added to doc in the ChangeLog?
Also, I would not abbreviate indir in the param name.
Thanks,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:08:23AM +0200, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
gcc/fortran/
* trans-types.c (gfc_get_array_descr_info): Use PLACEHOLDER_EXPR nodes
instead of VAR_DECL ones in type-related expressions. Remove base_decl
initialization.
Ugh, I must say I don't like
[CCing java-patches now]
Java testsuite breaks with -std=gnu11 as a default and/or with
-Wimplicit-function-declaration on, since the jvgenmain.c program
that generates a C file containing 'main' function which calls either
'JvRunMainName' or 'JvRunMain' does not generate forward declarations
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:00:48PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:54:00AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Java testsuite breaks with -std=gnu11 as a default and/or with
-Wimplicit-function-declaration on, since the jvgenmain.c program
that generates a C file containing
On 10/07/2014 09:26 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
You're right. I have attached an updated patch. The new code becomes:
#ifdef HAVE_AS_LEON
#define AS_LEON_FLAG -Aleon
+#define AS_LEONV7_FLAG -Aleon
#else
#define AS_LEON_FLAG -Av8
+#define AS_LEONV7_FLAG -Av7
#endif
The patch is OK
Ok, I will update that. Is there a way of generating the comments
automatically?
Do you mean the ChangeLog? If so, contrib/mklog will generate a skeleton but
you'll still need to write the decription sentences.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 10/07/2014 11:07 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Ok, I will update that. Is there a way of generating the comments
automatically?
Do you mean the ChangeLog? If so, contrib/mklog will generate a skeleton but
you'll still need to write the decription sentences.
Perfect, thanks!
Hi Honza,
as you know, we have a wrong code bug, when a pure or const method is called
via a virtual thunk.
I had some more Ideas, how to fix that, but all of them had some serious
draw-backs, so I leave the details out...
But now I have a new insight, why the obvious fix for this serious
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:29:33AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Dominik Vogt v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On s390[x] the symbol value of a section symbol is definitely not
zero.
Is true even in an object file?
No.
I agree that in an executable a
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 20:55 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/06/2014 08:50 PM, Siva Chandra wrote:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/03/2014 05:41 PM, Siva Chandra wrote:
I understand that knowing whether a copy-ctor or a d-tor has been
On 10/07/2014 09:31 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
OK, thanks.
Andrew.
Document the latest additions.
? gcc-5/.changes.html.swp
Index: gcc-5/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -u -r1.14 changes.html
--- gcc-5/changes.html 2 Oct 2014
On 10/02/2014 10:24 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/10/14 10:09 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/02/2014 06:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/10/14 11:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Note Ed's recent changes. Committed to CVS.
And fix a markup error that I expected xmllint to catch
On 07/10/14 08:39 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
OK, here is a patch for both using typename as a class key for
template template parms and for __has_include, etc.
Are these too wordy?
They look OK to me, although you say __has_include_next and
__has_include_next in both places, the first
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
Hi Richard,
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
Hi Richard,
It seems the new get_some_local_dynamic_name implementation in
function.c lost the non-NULL check the sparc.c
PR59717 is a request for hints which header to include if the compiler warns
about incompatible implicit declarations. E.g., if one uses abort
without declaring it first, we now say
note: include ‘stdlib.h’ or provide a declaration of ‘abort’
I've added hints only for standard functions which
Hi all,
Attached patch fixes PR lto/59441.
The reason of failure was that the default bitmap obstack was released
just before the execution of early local passes.
The error was found using valgrind. It reported that there were 153
invalid reads and 173 invalid writes into the field of the
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:53:17PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
This patch adds plugin support to libgomp, as well as memory mapping and
interaction with target devices through plugin's interface.
Still have issues with the non-installed testing.
( mkdir objmic cd objmic ../configure
On 1 October 2014 17:11, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 September 2014 15:27, Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 10 July 2014 12:12, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 July 2014 11:05, Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@linaro.org
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/06/2014 08:50 PM, Siva Chandra wrote:
But, the question is whether it is required to determine the parameter
passing ABI. If there is no special marker to indicate that the user
declared 'tor is explicitly defaulted,
On 07 Oct 15:06, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Still have issues with the non-installed testing.
The idea was that the offload compiler should be installed.
If I add
-B /usr/src/gcc-git/objinst/usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.0.0/ \
-B
Hi!
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:51:53 +0400, Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07 Oct 15:06, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Still have issues with the non-installed testing.
The idea was that the offload compiler should be installed.
If I add
-B
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com wrote:
To be honest my original patches for a deleted/defaulted markers on
special member functions was really just meant to give the consumer a
way to know why GCC produced a declaration in the first place. Which I
still think is
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:51:53PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
On 07 Oct 15:06, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Still have issues with the non-installed testing.
The idea was that the offload compiler should be installed.
If I add
-B
On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 21:55 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, David Malcolm wrote:
Should this have the $(exeext) suffix seen in Makefile.in?
$(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version)$(exeext)
Depends on whether that's needed for the pex code to find it.
As for (B), would
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
PR59717 is a request for hints which header to include if the compiler warns
about incompatible implicit declarations. E.g., if one uses abort
without declaring it first, we now say
note: include ‘stdlib.h’ or provide a
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Ilya Palachev i.palac...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi all,
Attached patch fixes PR lto/59441.
The reason of failure was that the default bitmap obstack was released just
before the execution of early local passes.
The error was found using valgrind. It reported that
Hi!
Also, something that I believe has been discussed in the past, but can't
find it on your wiki page nor in *.opt, are option overrides for the
offloading target, i.e. some option you can pass to the host compiler driver
during linking that will tell the driver for which offloading targets (if
On 07 Oct 16:30, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Another thing I've noticed, when target-1.exe is built, there are tons of
sections that IMHO should have been stripped away:
Could you please re-checkout the branch? I fixed this issue a week ago.
Thanks,
-- Ilya
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Testcase? I think it would be better to handle this in the canonical type
merging code in lto.c - or how does it end up working without LTO? That is,
what does the Ada frontend do to make sure get_alias_set handles
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Why not annotate builtins.def with the info?
Because I think that would be more hairy, I'd have to change DEF_BUILTIN
and all the builtins. That seemed superfluous given that this hint is
only for a C FE...
Marek
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:51:31PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Why not annotate builtins.def with the info?
Because I think that would be more hairy, I'd have to change DEF_BUILTIN
and all the builtins. That seemed superfluous
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Why not annotate builtins.def with the info?
Because I think that would be more hairy, I'd have to change DEF_BUILTIN
and all the builtins. That seemed
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:00:26PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Why not annotate builtins.def with the info?
Because I think that would be more hairy,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:00:05PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:51:31PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Why not annotate builtins.def with the info?
Because I think that would be more hairy, I'd have
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:00:26PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Why not annotate builtins.def with the info?
Because I think that would be more hairy,
2014-10-03 23:59 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 10/03/14 02:50, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Attached is an updated version of the patch. It has disabled
instrumenttation for builtin calls.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2014-10-02 Ilya Enkovichilya.enkov...@intel.com
* tree-chkp.c:
Marek == Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com writes:
Marek [CCing java-patches now]
Marek Java testsuite breaks with -std=gnu11 as a default and/or with
Marek -Wimplicit-function-declaration on
I don't recall how one gets warnings when compiling this generated code,
but if it is generally
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:03:26AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
Marek == Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com writes:
Marek [CCing java-patches now]
Marek Java testsuite breaks with -std=gnu11 as a default and/or with
Marek -Wimplicit-function-declaration on
I don't recall how one gets warnings
Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
not, could I please apply this patch?
Thanks.
Aldy
commit a679529d14f005d8c88517f72d2b5295d8c82f0f
Author: Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 7 09:32:21 2014 -0700
* Makefile.in (TAGS): Tag ../include
On 10/04/2014 07:28 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
This really does build clean and test clean on x86_64-linux.
It's basically the same as for 5.0 except experimental/any isn't in and
variable templates aren't in.
OK.
Jason
Marek I saw declarations of JvRunMain{,Name} with no parameters and with
Marek some parameters.
Oh yeah, duh.
Marek So I decided to make it prototype-less function
Marek declaration for now. I think we don't have to worry about
Marek -Wstrict-prototypes for now.
Thanks for looking.
Tom
Patches adding new -march= values need to update invoke.texi.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Errr... a static that only gets written to?
OK to commit?
commit 7b1c19385fd06d6a2d0844d453bf1c7683071440
Author: Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Oct 7 10:14:02 2014 -0700
* dwarf2out.c: Remove current_function_has_inlines.
(gen_subprogram_die): Same.
Some more cleanups revealed by testing on ppc64.
Applying to trunk.
2014-10-07 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c: Use -fgnu89-inline.
* gcc.dg/iftrap-1.c: Fix implicit declarations.
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr26350.c: Likewise.
*
On 10/06/14 20:57, Joern Rennecke wrote:
On 6 October 2014 19:58, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
What makes word_mode special here? ie, why is special casing for word_mode
the right thing to do?
The patch does not special-case word mode. The if condition tests if
smode would
cover multiple
jit/internal-api.c and .h were getting large, so I broke them out into:
* jit-common.h (forward decls of types)
* jit-recording.h/c (the gcc::jit::recording classes)
* jit-playback.h/c (the gcc::jit::playback classes)
Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit as
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
2014-10-07 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
PR c/59717
* c-decl.c (header_for_builtin_fn): New function.
(implicitly_declare): Suggest which header to include.
* gcc.dg/pr59717.c: New test.
OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Hi,
you can have chains of clone functions in the callgraph but
can_inline_edge_p
stops at the first clone when it is looking for DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION, which
can fool the following conditions in the
Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit:
gcc/jit/ChangeLog.jit:
* docs/internals/index.rst (Overview of code structure): Directly
include the comment from jit-common.h as rst, rather than as a
quoted C++ comment.
* jit-common.h: Convert the summary format to valid
On 10/07/2014 01:16 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Errr... a static that only gets written to?
OK to commit?
Yes. This should have been removed with
2010-09-03 Marcin Baczynski marb...@gmail.com
* dwarf2out.c (file scope): Remove #if0'd code.
(gen_subprogram_die): Same.
On 10/07/2014 11:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
adding a hint in this case is less obvious than in the C case, because,
what if this wasn't supposed to be ::abort (), but std::abort (), or
some other namespace abort, or some class abort () method etc.?
It still seems reasonable to offer a hint if
On 07 Oct 16:30, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I think it is useful, doesn't have to be in the initial checkin, but I'd
certainly prefer if from the (optional) --enable-offload-target argument
it would figure out everything it needs to add for testing.
And, if mkoffload isn't flexible enough to be
In -std=gnu11 as a default mode many Fortran tests ended up as
UNSUPPORTED, because check_effective_target_fd_truncate routine
was missing the string.h header (it uses strncmp) hence it failed.
Applying to trunk.
2014-10-07 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* lib/target-supports.exp
.
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20141007/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_4.f90:9:103:
Err\or: IMPLICIT NONE (type) statement at (1) following an IMPLICIT statement
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
And now
We may have missing BINFO on a type if that type is a builtin, since
in LIPO mode we will reset builtin types to their original tree nodes
before parsing subsequent modules. Handle incomplete information by
returning false so we won't put an entry in the type inheritance graph
for optimization.
Ok (please also guard it with L_IPO_COMP_MODE).
David
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
We may have missing BINFO on a type if that type is a builtin, since
in LIPO mode we will reset builtin types to their original tree nodes
before parsing
On Oct 7, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files?
I don’t think there is.
If not, could I please apply this patch?
I’m in favor.
Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com writes:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale_facets.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale_facets.cc
index 3669acb..7ed04e6 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale_facets.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/locale_facets.cc
@@ -69,19 +69,26 @@
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:12:22PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
And, is __gnu_offload_{funcs,vars} named that way just because the plugin
isn't able to add
symbols around the sections for you? As it doesn't contain a dot, it would
collide
with user declarations put into
Hi,
This patch adds overlap functionality to gcov-tool. The overlap score
estimates the similarity of two profiles. Currently it only computes
overlap for arc counters.
The overlap score is defined as
\sum minimum (p1-counter[i] / p1-sum-all, p2-counter[i] / p2-sum-all)
where p1-counter[i] and
The enclosed patch for google 4.9 is a backport of r210828 from
trunk.
googleref:b/14623977
The given tests now pass when run by hand, but timeout under dejagnu
I will be sending a different change to fix that.
OK for google 4.9?
The enclosed patch for google 4.9 is a backport of r210828 from
Hi!
I'd like to kick off a discussion about moving the default standard
for C from gnu89 to gnu11.
This really shouldn't be much of a surprise: the docs mention that
gnu11 is intended future default for a year now. I would presume now
is a good time to make this move: together with the new
On 06/10/2014 23:05, Daniel Krügler wrote:
2014-10-06 23:00 GMT+02:00 François Dumont frs.dum...@gmail.com:
On 05/10/2014 22:54, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014, François Dumont wrote:
I took a look at PR 61217 regarding pop_heap complexity guarantee.
Looks like we have no test to
2014-10-07 23:11 GMT+02:00 François Dumont frs.dum...@gmail.com:
On 06/10/2014 23:05, Daniel Krügler wrote:
François, could you please submit a corresponding LWG issue by sending
an email using the recipe described here:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#submit_issue
On 09/24/2014 05:15 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/24/2014 05:06 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
Unfortunately, just stripping the USING_DECL in lookup_and_check_tag
does not really work because some diagnotic codes expect the
USING_DECL not to be stripped.
It seems to me that the problem is that
Hi,
When Jason added the new g++.dg/ipa/devirt-28a.C test along with his
fix for PR c++/58678
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00838.html), this new
test was failing in the ARM and AArch64 configuration I am testing.
For the arm*-none-eabi and aarch64*-none-elf configurations,
On 7 October 2014 18:38, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/06/14 20:57, Joern Rennecke wrote:
On 6 October 2014 19:58, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
What makes word_mode special here? ie, why is special casing for
word_mode
the right thing to do?
The patch does not special-case
Patch:
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_4.f90 2014-10-07
00:21:56.0 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/implicit_4.f902014-10-07 19:09:45.0
+0200
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ END
SUBROUTINE a
IMPLICIT REAL(b-j)
-implicit none ! { dg-error Type IMPLICIT NONE
Index: MAINTAINERS
===
--- MAINTAINERS(revision 215985)
+++ MAINTAINERS(working copy)
@@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ Chung-Ju Wujasonw...@gmail.com
Le-Chun Wul...@google.com
Mingjie Xing
Currently the bswap pass only look for bswap pattern by examining bitwise
OR statement and doing following def-use chains. However a rotation
(left or right) can finish a manual byteswap, as shown in the following example:
unsigned
byteswap_ending_with_rotation (unsigned in)
{
in = ((in
Hi,
This patch is posted long before in a series of patches at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01392.html . Since the
preceding patch is changed according to review comments, also because it's
long time not reviewed, I rebased and updated this patch as attached.
With this patch,
Ping. Any review comments?
Thanks,
bin
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Sebastian Pop seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
As analyzed in PR62178, IVOPT can't find the optimal iv set for that case.
The problem with current heuristic algorithm is it only replaces candidate
with ones
Hi,
This patch adds overlap functionality to gcov-tool. The overlap score
estimates the similarity of two profiles. Currently it only computes
overlap for arc counters.
The overlap score is defined as
\sum minimum (p1-counter[i] / p1-sum-all, p2-counter[i] / p2-sum-all)
where
This patch addresses PR bootstrap/63432 which was an insanity in the
probabilities created during jump threading. This was caused by threading
multiple times along the same path leading to the second jump thread path being
corrupted, which in turn caused the profile update code to fail. There
was
On 10/06/14 19:31, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 6, 2014, at 4:32 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
How many merging opportunities does
On 10/07/14 22:39, Teresa Johnson wrote:
This patch addresses PR bootstrap/63432 which was an insanity in the
probabilities created during jump threading. This was caused by threading
multiple times along the same path leading to the second jump thread path being
corrupted, which in turn caused
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/06/14 19:31, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 6, 2014, at 4:32 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:57 AM,
101 - 193 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
