On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:14:41PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
It might be that RTL alias analysis / CSE give up too early here
(we don't optimize across asm() on the GIMPLE level at all ... heh).
I didn't look where it gives up (even though appearantly it does).
The cse1 pass doesn't carry
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:51 AM, David Wohlferd d...@limegreensocks.com
wrote:
On 11/13/2014 6:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, David Wohlferd wrote:
Sorry for the (very) delayed response. I'm
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:53:53PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
Don't you need another plugin to claim those offload IR sections?
No, the plan was that a regular plugin will just ignore offload IR
sections by default. In
On Thu, 2014-11-13 at 11:45 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:41 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 11:43 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at
tries to compile LTO IR, which is not present.
Bootstrap and regtesting on x86_64-linux using binutils 20141114 in progress.
OK for trunk when finished?
Thanks,
-- Ilya
gcc/
* cgraphunit.c (symbol_table::compile): Set flag_fat_lto_objects
in case of g-have_offload.
diff --git
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:14:59AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:53:53PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
Don't you need another plugin to claim those offload IR sections?
No, the plan was that a
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 5:08 PM, David Edelsohn edels...@gnu.org wrote:
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Maxim Kuvyrkov as reviewer for the Android sub-port.
Please join me in congratulating Maxim on his new role.
Maxim, please update your
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2014-09-14 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/guality/guality.exp (check_guality): Save/restore
test_counts array around the body of the procedure.
* gcc.dg/guality/guality.exp (check_guality): Likewise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63610
--- Comment #15 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #14)
You aren't seeing regressions because you're not setting
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET during the gcc build.
Oh, so that's it!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63610
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm the patch for __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__ has been
applied to 4.9 (AFAICT), although not to 4.8,
Jack, what does your 4.9 compiler give for:
gcc -dM -E -x c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #3 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
Created attachment 33968
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33968action=edit
patch against trunk for handling deployment targets correctly
This is more of a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51153
Thomas Schwinge tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63610
--- Comment #17 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #16)
Hmm the patch for __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__ has been
applied to 4.9 (AFAICT)
Yes it has.
although
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #4 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
Created attachment 33969
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33969action=edit
patch against 4.9 branch for handling deployment targets correctly
Patched GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #5 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
Created attachment 33970
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33970action=edit
patch against 4.8 branch for handling deployment targets correctly
This patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63862
Bug ID: 63862
Summary: C frontend converts shift-count to int while standard
wants integer promotions
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
--- Comment #12 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
So far it seems the issue unlikely caused by PIC-related changes in i686 - test
passes with -fno-devirtualize.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
--- Comment #5 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The root cause is AArch64's TARGET_LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS are not doing well when
the input is ((reg + reg) + offset).
looks like currently we have considered reg + non_normal_offset, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #52 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
Attachment 33932 should be superseded by attachment 33970 from bug 63810.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63863
Bug ID: 63863
Summary: New warnings in libobjc due to the move over to GNU11
by default
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63863
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63724
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
tried to simplify the code
as much as possible while not making it too simple (so that neither
compiler starts vectorizing the code).
Tested with:
g++ (GCC) 5.0.0 20141114 (experimental)
Wouter
- - - 8 - - - 8 - - - 8 - - - 8 - - - 8 - - - 8 - - - 8 - - -
// Original code with 'manual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63865
Bug ID: 63865
Summary: [OpenACC] support acc cache
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63724
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ramana
Revision: 217546
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Fri Nov 14 11:03:00 2014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63813
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Jakub tells me this started with r217260.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63866
Bug ID: 63866
Summary: ICE in C++ printer with -fdump-ipa
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63866
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63866
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Started with r205684.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63610
--- Comment #18 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #17)
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #16)
Hmm the patch for __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__ has been
applied to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63864
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63839
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Nov 14 11:22:12 2014
New Revision: 217553
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217553root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/63839
* asan.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63839
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63856
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63853
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60580
Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiwang at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60580
Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
of the string is lost, but
only when the actual argument is itself a dummy argument with LEN=* .
$ gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 5.0.0 20141114 (experimental)
Marco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63848
Matthew Fortune matthew.fortune at imgtec dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63853
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Thanks for the commit. Any plan to take into account the Jakub's remarks in
comment 11?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63867
--- Comment #1 from mrestelli mrestelli at gmail dot com ---
Also, I should add that changing
type is(character(len=*))
to
type is(character(len=:))
given an internal compiler error (anyway, the code then is invalid)
Marco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63853
--- Comment #15 from Ilya Verbin iverbin at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #14)
Thanks for the commit. Any plan to take into account the Jakub's remarks in
comment 11?
Yes, I added them to my TODO list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
Bug ID: 63868
Summary: [5 Regression] Multiple failures in the libgomp test
suite between r217458 and r217501.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63848
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iverbin at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Perhaps we should just disable all offloading for Darwin, at least unless
some Darwin maintainer steps up and adds the needed support for that.
Well, this won't solve the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63869
Bug ID: 63869
Summary: gcc-4.9.2 make failed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
Ilya Verbin iverbin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iverbin at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870
Bug ID: 63870
Summary: [Aarch64] [ARM] Errors in use of NEON instrinsics are
reported incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63816
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tekaev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63816
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63871
Bug ID: 63871
Summary: -Weffc++ does not understand type deduction for return
types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63871
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 63871 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
The gc linker does not use the external linker merely because you link against
the net package. You need to also pass -linkmode external in ldflags.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63779
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63872
Bug ID: 63872
Summary: -Wunused-local-typedefs warns incorrectly on a typedef
that's referenced from a template
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63779
--- Comment #2 from Richard PALO richard at netbsd dot org ---
Sorry. Given the size, I'll use the following directory for any information
needed: http://www.netbsd.org/~richard/xulrunner31-g++-issue/
Index of /~richard/xulrunner31-g++-issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63872
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63873
Bug ID: 63873
Summary: target links in Concepts Index in gccint do not work
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63874
Bug ID: 63874
Summary: vtable address generation goes through memory
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63875
Bug ID: 63875
Summary: Bogus unused-but-set-parameter warning when expanding
a variadic template argument pack
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63872
--- Comment #2 from thakis at chromium dot org ---
I think warning on unused typedefs in local classes is generally a useful
feature, not a bug. The bug here is that it's warning on a typedef in a local
class that is being used.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63862
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
If the middle-end handles arbitrary integer types for shift counts, it
should be fine to remove this conversion (but check that the ubsan code
will handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63862
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63876
Bug ID: 63876
Summary: static data members of template classes w/ default
ctors gives undefined reference error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Igor Zamyatin from comment #11)
Will take a look. Thanks!
On Linux, the 32-bit PIC regression was introduced by r202145.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
(In reply to Igor Zamyatin from comment #11)
Will take a look. Thanks!
On Linux, the 32-bit PIC regression was introduced by r202145.
It is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin14 |i686
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63876
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
(In reply to Igor Zamyatin from comment #11)
Will take a look. Thanks!
On Linux, the 32-bit PIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
-fdevirtualize-speculatively doesn't work well with IPA-CP cloning
under 32-bit PIC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61552
--- Comment #1 from Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis Arfrever.FTA at GMail
dot Com ---
Created attachment 33974
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33974action=edit
gcc_delete_libart_check.patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877
Bug ID: 63877
Summary: - -Wmissing-declarations produces false alarms for C99
inline functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63878
Bug ID: 63878
Summary: Variables of incomplete type can be defined with
-fno-fat-lto-objects
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Without -fPIC, r202145 gave
pr63814.C:44:1: error: edge points to wrong declaration:
}
^
function_decl 0x7f56f87c6400 MixinFunc.constprop
type method_type 0x7f56f87bdf18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63878
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63876
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Leaver-Fay aleaverfay at gmail dot com ---
Thank you!
/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/prev-x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/prev-x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5-20141114/libstdc++-v3/libsupc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63878
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
This is probably essentially the same as bug 24293 (reporting such an
issue with -fsyntax-only).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24293
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #7 from Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #6)
../../gcc-5-20141114/gcc/config/darwin-c.c: In function ‘const char*
version_as_modern_macro(const long unsigned int*)’:
../../gcc-5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63878
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||24293
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60079
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60079
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
/data1/src/gcc-cavium/toolchain-thunder/scripts/../src/newlib/libc/stdlib/strtol.c:
In function ‘_strtol_r’:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60079
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note my testcase is with -mabi=ilp32 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33968|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33975|updated trunk patch that|patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33969|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez larryv at macports dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33970|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60079
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
Note my testcase is with -mabi=ilp32 too.
And the reduced testcase needs -mcpu=thunderx too. I am trying to see if this
fails on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63760
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|AVR |avr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63879
Bug ID: 63879
Summary: ICE compiling Linux Kernel fs/ext3/namei.c
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60079
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can't get a testcase that fails with the non-modified trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63760
--- Comment #4 from mojo at world3 dot net ---
I agree, a separate __funcP__is the best option.
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
