gcc-4.9-20141217 is now available

2014-12-17 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20141217 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20141217/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: GCC 4.8.4 Status Report (2014-12-05)

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Stump
On Dec 17, 2014, at 3:44 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: >> Currently gcc 4.8.4 does not bootstrap on darwin14 (Yosemite) due to pr61407. > > Why has it not been pushed in earlier? No good reason. No one checked it into the release

Re: GCC 4.8.4 Status Report (2014-12-05)

2014-12-17 Thread Mike Stump
On Dec 17, 2014, at 2:21 AM, FX wrote: >> Currently gcc 4.8.4 does not bootstrap on darwin14 (Yosemite) due to pr61407. >> Would it be possible to apply the patch at >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33932 >> before 4.8.4 is released? Results with the patch are posted at >> https:

Re: trying out openacc 2.0

2014-12-17 Thread Mark Farnell
But it would be highly unlikely to only build the compiler for the accelerator, 99% of the time you build the host and the accelerator. So why can't we simplify the build process by allowing users to specify the host architecture and list all the accelerators at ./configure then the user only invo

Extending -flto parallel feature to the rest of the build

2014-12-17 Thread Lewis Hyatt
Hello- I recently started using -flto in my builds, it's a very impressive feature, thanks very much for adding it. One thing that occurred to me while switching over to using it: In an LTO world, the object files, it seems to me, are becoming increasingly less relevant, at least for some applicat

Re: [RFC] GCC vector extension: binary operators vs. differing signedness

2014-12-17 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Richard Biener wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: >> > Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Ulrich Weigand >> >> wrote: >> >> > However, if we make that change, there will be some case

Re: GCC 4.8.4 Status Report (2014-12-05)

2014-12-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > Currently gcc 4.8.4 does not bootstrap on darwin14 (Yosemite) due to pr61407. Why has it not been pushed in earlier? I guess if you test it sufficiently and if Darwin maintainer acks it, perhaps. Note that the patch violates c

Re: trying out openacc 2.0

2014-12-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
Mark Farnell wrote: > So what parameters will I need to pass to ./configure if I want to > support PTX offloading? Pre-remark: I think that the https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Offloading page will be updated, once the support has been merged to the trunk. I think using the triplet "nvptx-unknown-none" i

Re: GCC 4.8.4 Status Report (2014-12-05)

2014-12-17 Thread FX
> Currently gcc 4.8.4 does not bootstrap on darwin14 (Yosemite) due to pr61407. > Would it be possible to apply the patch at > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33932 > before 4.8.4 is released? Results with the patch are posted at > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-12/msg0

Re: GCC 4.8.4 Status Report (2014-12-05)

2014-12-17 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
Currently gcc 4.8.4 does not bootstrap on darwin14 (Yosemite) due to pr61407. Would it be possible to apply the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33932 before 4.8.4 is released? Results with the patch are posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-12/msg02096.html.