Hi,
I would like to find out if this is the correct forum to
ask/discuss about GCC 5's OpenMP 4.0 implementation, in particular the
new accelerator feature which from what I understand, allows the compute
to be offloaded to external GPU/accelerator.
I have a Parallella board (ARM dua
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20150211 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20150211/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 10-02-15 14:46, Richard Biener wrote:
This patch is a way to achieve that gimplification doesn't call the actual
>gimplify_expr langhook, and it fixes the failure. But I'm guessing that's
>not the proper way to fix this.
More like
Index: gcc/tree.c
===
On 10-02-15 17:57, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
I've added two modifications to gimplify_modify_expr:
- the WITH_SIZE_EXPR in which the CALL_TREE is wrapped, is dropped after
gimplification, but we need the size expression at expansion in pass_stdarg.
Hi,
I am pleased to announce the release of ODB 2.4.0.
ODB is an open source object-relational mapping (ORM) system for C++. It
allows you to persist C++ objects to a relational database without having
to deal with tables, columns, or SQL and without manually writing any of
the mapping code. ODB
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 10:00 AM, Cyd Haselton wrote:
>>
>>
>> On February 11, 2015 2:36:59 AM CST, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On 11/02/15 00:41, Cyd Haselton wrote:
>
> I'd rather leave it on-list for future reference. The best thing
>
On 02/11/2015 10:00 AM, Cyd Haselton wrote:
>
>
> On February 11, 2015 2:36:59 AM CST, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 11/02/15 00:41, Cyd Haselton wrote:
>>>
I'd rather leave it on-list for future reference. The best thing
would be for libfakechroot to be linked against libdl: that wa
On February 11, 2015 2:36:59 AM CST, Andrew Haley wrote:
>On 11/02/15 00:41, Cyd Haselton wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'd rather leave it on-list for future reference. The best thing
>>> would be for libfakechroot to be linked against libdl: that way,
>when
>>> dlopen() was called the link would be corr
On 11/02/15 00:41, Cyd Haselton wrote:
>
>>
>> I'd rather leave it on-list for future reference. The best thing
>> would be for libfakechroot to be linked against libdl: that way, when
>> dlopen() was called the link would be correctly satisfied. If that
>> isn't possible (if dlopen() doesn't wo